• #11,081
I don't think they pulled up and "realized they didn't have a warrant", but sometimes just showing up and asking to check inside is enough to make some people panic and scramble. Remember too they started searching the area between the two houses today as well. Something could have popped up on a cell phone dump, they may have found something in between the houses, there may have been something suspicious in plain sight. There's really no telling what happened between last night and today that convinced a judge to sign off on a search warrant.
This reminds me. I wonder what became of the tip that lady had, (who was looking for LE among the reporters)....something she found along the road during her walk she thought might be important.
 
  • #11,082
This is more of a general question for any LE or LE-adjacent who may know- in these high profile cases where time may be of the essence, do the detectives on the inside of the cases work overnight to go through evidence collected? Or are there multiple shifts coming and going, who comb through evidence, pictures, traffic cams, paperwork etc? Obviously it would depend on the size of the LE agency and regional resources, but curious as to how quickly things like this could move and if it really is a 24/7 operation at this point in the investigation.
LE Adjacent but if I was working a life or death case, it was not a "go home tonight and we'll find these folks tomorrow to talk to them" kind of situation. Anytime I worked with actual detectives, there were a lot of cases (we don't exactly have a great crime rate when I'm located...) that I know those guys either didn't go home or went home just long enough to change clothes, shower, and grab some food. A nap at a desk was not uncommon to see. I think it honestly depends on the detective, it depends on the case, and it depends on your overall resources. Plus there's the additional question of "do you trust someone else with your case evidence?" factor. Paperwork, records requests, things like that could sometimes be handed off to someone else, but calling a judge for warrants/orders/etc. fell on the lead investigator.
 
  • #11,083
  • #11,084
Does anyone know where AG & T's car is? I'm wondering whether they were especially interested in what's in the car in terms of blood evidence. Could it be that the car wasn't there last night?

JMO
 
  • #11,085
  • #11,086
The uber is verified. Car damage could have happened anytime. Likely unrelated, but who knows. Possible blood was staged. TC is biology teacher. Pipettes.
The car that’s damaged is Annie’s?
 
  • #11,087
  • #11,088
Going backwards a bit because I have just been lurking here and not posting, the weirdest thing to me from the beginning of this, as just a person with a close family and older grandparents around Nancy's age, is that she was brought back to the house, apparently, at almost 10pm (after arriving over four hours earlier at 5:30ish). I know people have different schedules, etc. but MOST people that age are in their home, if not in bed, by that time. It's just a biological thing for most older people. [Edit for details: They like to get into their Pjs, wash up, take out dentures ha, and sit in front of the Tv for a bit to wind down before going to bed].

We have my grandparents over for dinner often and it's usually a 5:30pm ish pickup, with a 7-8pm at the LATEST return home, we go in and make sure the temperature in the home is good if it's winter, that the lights are on, etc. No we don't have to do that/they would be fine on their own, but I think most people can attest to similar with older relatives, especially if they're not the best on their feet. Late at night they are usually tired.

So that stood out to me from the JUMP as a detail for a casual (four hour) family dinner down the road. The late return from dinner at the sister's... If she was dropped off at almost 10pm for most people that's not bed until 10:30. Which again is pretty late for an older person especially if she goes to church in the morning.
 
Last edited:
  • #11,089
  • #11,090
  • #11,091
And if SIL was involved I really hope AG wasn’t… it’s possible she wasn’t if he planned it with a friend or something. IDK what to think anymore. Really hoped the family wasn’t involved.
If SIL was involved I likewise hope that AG wasn't, but I do think there must have been 2 people.
 
  • #11,092
I'm sure they have their eyes on everybody involved. Also, I just confirmed (using AI) that if you are born in Italy, you may enjoy dual citizenship after you become a US citizen. So someone may have two different passports.
 
  • #11,093
Doesn't mean she was alive, does it? All the timeline says is that "Sixteen minutes later, at 2:28 a.m., Guthrie’s pacemaker app showed it had disconnected from her phone." Wouldn't this indicate that she was taken away from her phone at that time? Could she have already been deceased at that point, but still have her phone on her?

I don't know how pacemakers work, if someone else could chime in here. Would the app show activity if she was deceased and was still wearing the watch?

Source: Authorities provide a timeline of the night Nancy Guthrie disappeared
Im fairly certain that most pacemaker monitoring apps work via Bluetooth connection, WiFi connection, and app continuously running (open) in background. The watch may display the app icon but it cannot be used as a substitute for phone.
So the disconnect could be from phone being turned off, app being closed, or from her being moved out of blue tooth range.
If she was deceased and still connected via Bluetooth to phone it should have a recording of alarm/alerting rhythm and I believe it should have sent that to MD clinic urgently, although it may not have. Most devices are programmed to transfer data from device to app at a certain time each night (recommended to charge phone near bed). A lot are programmed to send data to clinic every 30, 60, or 90 days for review, although I believe alarm/alert messages/concerning data noted from device would be sent daily to heart clinic if connected to Bluetooth at schedule transfer time.
MOO.
 
  • #11,094
I imagine that the NG was upset about something and took an Uber to AG's house to confront SIL. SIL reacted violently and NG is harmed. SIL then takes NG's phone and deactivates her cameras, returns to NG's house alone and makes it look like a crime scene by putting drops of her blood outside the front door (maybe he couldn't get into the house?) to make it look like she was kidnapped, and smashes the floodlight. Then he leaves her phone in her car? I'm not sure where the phone was found. Then the ransom notes some time later. AG looked a certain way in the latest plea at a certain moment like she was appealing to him.
 
  • #11,095
I'm sure they have their eyes on everybody involved. Also, I just confirmed (using AI) that if you are born in Italy, you may enjoy dual citizenship after you become a US citizen. So someone may have two different passports.
Yes, and he could travel to and stay in any EU country.
It's the same in my case.
 
  • #11,096
Oh im sure they gave anything they remembered to LE. Especially if they didnt have a busy night. They'd be more likely to remember.
Yes, but do we know for sure tbat she took an uber?
 
  • #11,097
The title of the article is how it could possibly show a spike
They only said disconnected at the presser.
This is what it says in the text of the article:

“But it does tell us that she was in close proximity to her cell phone at 2 o’clock in the morning … until that time, they were together,” he said.

The top doc said it would “be easy to know” whether the spike indicated an innocent, routine check-in or an arrhythmia, which would suggest a struggle – and Guthrie’s physician would have the answer.
 
  • #11,098
The critical question is have they gotten proof of life?

The siblings first plea made it sound like they wanted to hear from the ransomer(s) but were not willing to pay unless they got proof of life of Nancy first. Now they are saying that they got the (ransomer(s) message and are now willing to pay.

This leads me to believe that they DID get proof of life - either that - or they never got proof of life, may fear she is dead, but are willing to pay the ransomer to get their mother back in any condition.
 
  • #11,099
I think the flashing lights are from a FARO camera. imo
 
  • #11,100
Just a general query, but how often do you think a parent might try to cover for a child's actions? Would most parents, some parents, not at all; what do you think, in general? Just curiousity, fwiw.
I actually think a lot of parents would. It's a natural instinct to want to protect them.
 
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
222
Guests online
1,393
Total visitors
1,615

Forum statistics

Threads
644,258
Messages
18,814,146
Members
245,332
Latest member
baileychic8
Top