5 “10”- 6feetYes, Libby’s pic of RA was the key to the case.
Remember the guesses about height weight?
Any guesses height and weight with this person?
JMO
5 “10”- 6feetYes, Libby’s pic of RA was the key to the case.
Remember the guesses about height weight?
Any guesses height and weight with this person?
JMO
The blood trail stopping at the edge of the driveway leads me to believe that a car was parked on the circular drive closest to the front door, although interestingly no car is seen in the images/videos of the suspect released today.
I think he was trying to block it, either in lieu of removing it, or prior to removing it.I am just baffled by the activity with the plant before he presumably destroyed the camera...
Oh! Smart thought!My opinion only:
The video of the assailant is earlier when they are disabling the camera.
Later, they gain entry to the house thru some other means.
Once they get inside 30 minutes later, the abduction is pretty quick.. and she is removed from the front door (where the camera is now disabled) and that is the difference in time.
I'm struggling to see this - for those saying female looking eyes, what makes you say that? They look male to me, so does body language, gait and body formFemale looking eyes.
He is standing in front of bricks they can measure- they know his heightGah, I've missed so much on this thread this mornng!! I only just watched the released door cam footage. A few things come to mind (likely already discussed pages ago):
1. Calm, cool and collected and not in any rush. Doesn't seem nervous. Experienced in functioning under pressure?
2. To me, looks/seems like a young person
3. So only 1 perp? Not 2? He has to be very fit/strong to carry her out on his own
4. He seemed prepared and persistent. The camera obstacle and risk didn't slow him down nor did he move onto another house if just a B&E. He wanted in that house. Reminds me of BK from Idaho 4 a bit in that regard
5. Can't tell his size... build and height? I'll try to read back to see as I'm sure FBI have measurements
6. Sounds like they're saying it's a man, but the face shot looks very feminine to me... the eyes... like wearing mascara???
View attachment 643427
Maybe deliberate?Honestly? My first thought when I saw this...
averageWhat does anyone think about the shoe size?
Well, I do question it. I see painted lashes and neatky trimmed, arched brows.It’s most certainly a man. No need to even question it
Also, LE/FBI say "HE"I'm struggling to see this - for those saying female looking eyes, what makes you say that? They look male to me, so does body language, gait and body form
I think he used the flowers to get a better grip on the camera/doorbell, due to the gloves.Right? Just remove the camera 1st thing! Instead he goes over and picks freaking flowers to cover up the lens? Is this suspect trying to lead LE to thinking they are amateur?
Would a man place a gun holder in that spot?
I was thinking it would probably get in the way and be super uncomfortable if it was a man which makes me wonder if it isWould a man place a gun holder in that spot?
What do you mean?Maybe the same day AG's website did?
We can agree to disagree. You're right, off-topic.As someone who has been on the receiving side of federal law enforcement subpoenas at a major tech company.... no. Not all data is retained, and the government does not have access (except to the data that is handed over as part of a subpoena or similar legal process).
If we want to talk about the NSA and Snowden and all of that, it's a different conversation (not on-topic here at all). But for purposes of this case, and federal law enforcement investigating a murder and/or kidnapping, there is no direct government access to that data, and the data is not globally retained forever. (Just trying to avoid perpetuation of conspiracy theories...)