- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 31,866
- Reaction score
- 312,296
I want the perp caught and convicted, but I also want it done properly. I'm trusting it is.
jmo
jmo
How do you know there was no warrant?Barged in without a warrant...and even cuffed the son that was playing Nintendo who is not the subject of the investigation. Not good. If this is really the guy, it could hurt their case.
Oh that holstered gun and where it was located.....What does this even mean?
Not to mention that they can't have confirmed that the woman is actually the MIL of the detained person, or that the name she said is correct.sorry, no. i went to school for journalism. the ethical thing to do would be to speak to her and not air it. i don't think he's being intentionally malicious, but he's been covering this case since the beginning and is probably tired. he should rest, but i don't like this at all.
not saying the guy detained isn't guilty, but we have literally no way to know what led them down this trail or what basis they're questioning him on. it's pretty irresponsible to air an interview with his family.
Yes sorry I added to my previous post an ETA. It does sound like a 3rd party company that deals with multiple delivery companies.But in another interview on CNN she said "I don't know...Fed X." My thought is that he might work for a temp agency and works for multiple delivery companies.
Maybe he is the guy that had the Amazon uniform on caught trespassing that was posted by Pima Co Sherrif
I thought I heard the mom say they didn't have one as well... but I could be wrong. Everything is moving so fast.Why do you think they don't have a warrant? It's typical to detain/secure anyone in the house for officer safety. This isn't crazy.
One of the legal folks said they can enter without warrant under certain circumstances when there is an abduction. LE often cuffs other occupants while they secure the scene then release them fairly quickly.Barged in without a warrant...and even cuffed the son that was playing Nintendo who is not the subject of the investigation. Not good. If this is really the guy, it could hurt their case.
Actually you have to state that it is your opinion...long standing rule hereUm yah that’s what “positing” means.
Or, is it possible he could have delivered Door Dash to Nancy at her home on a prior occasion? (Just a thought. MOO … possible though maybe not probable.)I find this interesting.
If they door dash, I wonder if they also pick up shifts as an Uber Driver?
Angry exes rarely can give enough info relevant to a case so compelling that a judge or magistrate would sign a no knock warrant for a search that will take hours to complete. If this was a random tip, they wouldn't send SWAT.How certain is it that this man is actually involved and not just a case of mistaken identity or a person turned in by an angry Ex?
The MIL said it, that he delivers, she said: "he works in Tucson all week' delivering boxes for UPS and... he works for a company. You can call the company to see if he's working" something like that.Then his routes will be scrutinized if he is on a truck but he could be package sorter in warehouse, dispatcher, or any job…don’t jump to conclusions to put him in the frame.
It's also unclear, as far as I know, if the detained person is related to the abduction of NG or the ransom, if separate (or even if related, it's not clear if this person actually took NG). He could be an accomplice or committed a related crime ?Not to mention that they can't have confirmed that the woman is actually the MIL of the detained person, or that the name she said is correct.
She doesn't. There was a warrant.How do you know there was no warrant?
Okay, seeing a lot of conversation and I'm not sure of best practices here... I recorded the Brian Entin interview with the (alleged) mother-in-law of the subject that was taken into custody earlier. Would it be okay for me to post it, or considering the potential ethical problems with it, should I just leave it unposted? Bit new here and I don't want to cause trouble, because the name is mentioned in full by the mother-in-law.
Thinking back to the security camera footage of the neighbor in Nancy’s neighborhood who had a trespasser… was the trespasser wearing a FedEx uniform or something similar?CNN Live journo on scene in Rio Rico interviewing Mom-in-law of detained suspect and its her house being searched. Sounds like she is totally befuddled? But I believe she said that her SIL does delivery work "Fedex?" and travels to Tucson sometimes. Why is LE not interviewed her??
ETA last 2 sentences
Ahhh okay.Oh that holstered gun and where it was located.....
Right in the front.....
This case is such a media frenzy..........