HerNameWasBuffy
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2026
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 162
I think that's very plausible.My maybe silly idea (I posted this before) was that a bug like a black widow spider was there, so he needed something to brush it away.![]()
I think that's very plausible.My maybe silly idea (I posted this before) was that a bug like a black widow spider was there, so he needed something to brush it away.![]()
It’s clever though that, as it’s cheap, hundreds of thousands in the US must buy that backpack every week. It’s going to be difficult to trace down one buyer.If the backpack is truly from Walmart, that would be something. How many times have we seen footage of criminals buying their gear at Walmart?
Definitely agree with this. Let’s hope that the buyer bought it from the nearby Walmart and it was purchased recently as well. Otherwise I don’t see how they’d be able to track it down.It’s clever though that, as it’s cheap, hundreds of thousands in the US must buy that backpack every week. It’s going to be difficult to trace down one buyer.
~snip~Family history question:
Were either of them married before or does either of them have now adult children from a previous marriage/relationship?
me too. all this 100%That's how it looks to me, too. I am baffled by his approach to the camera. The plant, the lack of having some duct tape, but mostly when he covered it he used the side of his hand.
I've tried it myself, as if I was going to cover the camera and it's a very unnatural movement. You naturally want to use the palm of your hand. The way he did that was so awkward. I'm sure it means nothing but it's just bugging me as I can't even come up with a theory why he wouldn't cover palm first.
Well he didn’t do a good job did he!The person on camera was hired to clean up the crime scene
I thought he actually did work as a delivery person in Tucson. He had delivered to NG, or her neighbor before. Perhaps his phone, vehicle, lined up as clues, so they surveilled him.They don't send a SWAT team or get a warrant to search a house because of a tip of the person apprehended last night looking similar to this person. IMO LE had to have had other convincing concerns and information about this person (e.g. their movements, their vehicles, their cell phone activity, pings by NG's house while delivering packages, relative saying they were acting suspicious, etc) for a judge to okay the warrant and for the SWAT team to be deployed. JMHO
Well, if I may put on my bad guy hat for a second. I'd still rather have $6m sitting in a crypto wallet than not. Laundering it slowly over the course of your life is doable and won't raise any flags if you are okay with doing it in small chunks. You won't be living in a mansion or driving a lambo next week, but you won't ever need to work again.This is why I'm also skeptical of the ransom angle... $6m in crypto from one wallet is going to be difficult to launder around without attracting attention to it. There's next to no chance you get that liquid without setting off all sorts of flags quickly. It's almost like an afterthought that seems superficially plausible, but is fraught with issues when you dive into how this would actually be accomplished.
JMO
His MIL said he worked for a Fed-Ex type place and someone upthread someone mentioned the actual company.I thought he actually did work as a delivery person in Tucson. He had delivered to NG, or her neighbor before. Perhaps his phone, vehicle, lined up as clues, so they surveilled him.
After the video came out, they thought he looked similar. Judge gave a warrant.
I think the amount of coverage has LE, media, even judges jumping on anything that could help to solve the crime.
JMO
even if it exists, they are only releasing footage that they think will be useful in finding the person(s) who did this. No one needs to see the victim.Also, where is the footage of Nancy arriving to her home from earlier in the evening???
LE said the original timeline is she went in through the garage when her SIL dropped her off. They have not mentioned footage of that area so many pundits speculate it's not in the line of the camera.Also, where is the footage of Nancy arriving to her home from earlier in the evening???
I buy their stuff. I recently bought a cross body water bottle holder for about the same price.If the backpack is truly from Walmart, that would be something. How many times have we seen footage of criminals buying their gear at Walmart?
I’ve been wondering that same thing for a while.Also, where is the footage of Nancy arriving to her home from earlier in the evening???
Also, IMO, even if the perp doesn't have a good plan for cashing it out, I don't think this definitively means it's not real. I am sure there have been criminals who have used bitcoin without a complete understanding of how to launder it. Being bad at cryptocurrency does not immediately imply hoax to me, IMHO.Well, if I may put on my bad guy hat for a second. I'd still rather have $6m sitting in a crypto wallet than not. Laundering it slowly over the course of your life is doable and won't raise any flags if you are okay with doing it in small chunks. You won't be living in a mansion or driving a lambo next week, but you won't ever need to work again.
Bear with me on this…That's how it looks to me, too. I am baffled by his approach to the camera. The plant, the lack of having some duct tape, but mostly when he covered it he used the side of his hand.
I've tried it myself, as if I was going to cover the camera and it's a very unnatural movement. You naturally want to use the palm of your hand. The way he did that was so awkward. I'm sure it means nothing but it's just bugging me as I can't even come up with a theory why he wouldn't cover palm first.
Seems very convenient.LE said the original timeline is she went in through the garage when her SIL dropped her off. The garage entry is out of the camera line.