• #25,041
  • #25,042
They’ve also offered a $50k reward. One bitcoin is roughly $67k. They aren’t going to do the right thing over $17k?! Honestly, tell what you know and then get a reward, period. If they start giving money to any random person, who claims they know something about a case, it will set a huge precedent for the future.

Also, I’m somewhat surprised that the family hasn’t added to the reward. It’s only at $50k. You would think they would, but that’s just my two cents.
I find this strange as well. One the one hand, they're looking at paying a multi-million dollar ransom. On the other, there is a 50K reward on offer for her return. I'd think I'd go with a few hundred thousand as a motivator for info myself.
 
  • #25,043
If NG was removed in a body bag, can you explain the presence of the blood

1. Struggle prior to securing her in body bag. The suspect went up to the front door with steel welded security door, brandishing what looks to be a firearm. He may have threatened her to come out and a startled elderly lady may have panicked and complied, opened the door and struggle ensued.

2. Body bag rips as he drags her, leaves trail of blood drops. (more likely due to the blood trail). We're talking about a guy who buys a $15 backpack for his "kit". Any body bag or tarp probably wouldn't be a premium investment and low quality thrown together like everything else.
Yeah, perhaps wal mart didnt sell body bags, so he bought a $24 tarp.
 
  • #25,044
Occupational hearing loss is often in one ear only. Age related hearing loss (presbycusis) is usually in both ears but is seldom identical. Most people who experience hearing loss have one ear that is their “good” ear even if experiencing some degree of hearing loss in that ear. Usually they will use a hearing aid in only the ear that has the larger degree of hearing loss, although some people do prefer hearing aids in both ears. Individual preference.

As a severely hearing impaired person, it depends on the degree of decibel loss. I used to have a good ear lol. Now, I don’t. I'm way past one hearing device. I use 2 when I wear them.
 
  • #25,045
Last edited:
  • #25,046
Apologies if this has been answered here, but regarding the news that the blood on the porch likely indicates that she was bleeding from "either her hands or face". How would they know this? A poster upthread thought they'd read that the blood had been aspirated, but how does that track with bleeding from the hands. Can anyone shed light on this? TIA!
 
  • #25,047
I still do believe that she is hidden or buried (sorry to say) somewhere near her property. I'm sure they have used sniffer dogs before around her place. Maybe they should bring them back. I think the ransom notes are just from opportunist people.
SMH
 
  • #25,048
Yeah, perhaps wal mart didnt sell body bags, so he bought a $24 tarp.

Looking in my garage right now:

-roll of painters plastic sheet 3mil 10x100 feet
-10x12, 10x20, and larger plastic tarps
-numerous large drop cloths including poly
-contractor grade 60 gallon garbage bags 4-5 mil heavy duty
- plastic mattress bags and furniture covers
- old vinyl shower curtains (use them as drop cloths or to drag field dressed deer)

Any contractor/landscaper or even low end day laborer could throw something together,
 
  • #25,049
I don’t think it was a robbery, JMO.
I think the bag was full because of rope, gag, body bag, to get her out of the house more easily.
I’ve moved away from the ransom/ kidnapper theory. I think the ransom people were just opportunists. No proof of life, etc.
I think, someone wanted her gone, ( dead, sorry) but why?

What do you make of the ransom author saying per Harvey Levin that Nancy's watch was at the foot of a bed?
 
  • #25,050
  • Gloves found at Gurthrie’s home are being sent out for testing, the Pima County Sheriff’s Department said today. Pictures and videos released earlier this week by the FBI depicting Guthrie’s possible kidnapper showed a person wearing black gloves.

The wording here suggests to me that the gloves were found today or very recently. If so, that's strange in my book. Gloves should have been found in the initial search of the house, no? Hmmm.
 
  • #25,051
Thank you @MassGuy.

Unless LE can pinpoint that NG hand or face blood is from early AM 2/1, then as I've suggested ^, I wonder if that was blood from an everyday bleed for an 84 year old likely on an anti-coagulent (my suspicion per recent pics).

She could have had a bleed that started when she got out of a car in her driveway - maybe caught her hand on something... or maybe her return from her mailbox where she bumped her had.

Then in this scenario, when she stopped at the door to get in (get keys?), she would have dropped a concentration of blood, likely from her hand. IMO.
 
  • #25,052
I still do believe that she is hidden or buried (sorry to say) somewhere near her property. I'm sure they have used sniffer dogs before around her place. Maybe they should bring them back. I think the ransom notes are just from opportunist people.
SMH
I would go with hidden over buried. I'm sure that ground is so so hard, and apparently there has been no evidence of disturbed earth.
 
  • #25,053
Apologies if this has been answered here, but regarding the news that the blood on the porch likely indicates she was bleeding from "either her hands or face". How would they know this? A poster upthread thought they'd read that the blood had been aspirated, but how does that track with bleeding from the hands. Can anyone shed light on this? TIA!
I think it's differing analysis of the drops. However, this latest article did mention the aspirated appearance but then put the hands in for a possibility I guess. They can tell Nancy was standing upright when the blood fell.
 
  • #25,054
I still do believe that she is hidden or buried (sorry to say) somewhere near her property. I'm sure they have used sniffer dogs before around her place. Maybe they should bring them back. I think the ransom notes are just from opportunist people.
SMH
Is it common for dogs to miss a body the first time?
 
  • #25,055
Consider the front door guy wasn’t supposed to actually go up to the front door. The crew is at back breaking in and he was supposed to be “eyes” in front of house. He was to stay out of sight, but keep eyes & ears on the road, neighbors … he is hunch-walking around the front but doesn’t realise the brick arch was to front door & camera … once he realises he’s on camera he has to scramble.
Perhaps why he was unprepared … he’s the weakest link in the crew, gets the lookout job & gets hand-me-down holster & gun. Holster broken or doesn’t fit which is why it’s on wrong.
 
  • #25,056
To me this is unlikely. With the way the suspect was dressed, with the full backpack and firearm, if he was there with the intent to steal her debt/credit cards he could have just demanded them along with pin numbers. Having her along for that ride to a bank doesn't fit for me. She's more of a problem in this scenario to deal with afterward. Also, I think there's a limit to how much can be withdrawn. Also, those 🤬🤬🤬 or withdrawals would be easy to track.

At this moment, subject to change, I think this person(s) was there to specifically murder NG. The distracting ransom demands are not connected at all. I say person(s) because the suspect in the video might not be the mastermind behind this tragic event. I also don't think this suspect is some professional assassin either. While they look silly to me with a firearm hanging above their crotch w/ a holster that's likely meant for the inside of your waistband, and grabs flowers from her beds, this person likely showed extreme violence towards NG in just removing her from the home. IMO
I’m in complete agreement, the perps wanted NG dead (sorry), gone. But why?

A theory:
I thought NG maybe saw something, maybe drugs in a workers trunk( for their night job!), and maybe Nancy said “are those drugs?”, the man waved her off, “ no worries, no, not drugs, closed trunk.

Later he thought, what is she reports him, something as simple as that. He thought NG might be a risk to his freedom, if she stayed alive.
Just another idea idea, JMO
 
  • #25,057
I would go with hidden over buried. I'm sure that ground is so so hard, and apparently there has been no evidence of disturbed earth.
I'm sure there are many crevices and caves in the nearby mountains where they could hide a body.
 
  • #25,058
I know we are not privy to all information but this case really feels like the people in charge have no idea what has gone on here and they are clutching at straws. I think the case has been botched from the start.

I feel it has become a circus and sometimes it’s easy to forget at the centre of this is a family who are missing their 84 year old mother.
I disagree. The sheriff did say he probably should have handled some things differently and he at least responded to the question when he was asked. There’s much more going on than we know and it needs to stay that way to protect the investigation. It seems when it goes quiet, they’re onto something and getting things sorted out, then bam!
 
  • #25,059
I would go with hidden over buried. I'm sure that ground is so so hard, and apparently there has been no evidence of disturbed earth.
I guess that's why they were checking septic and water tanks. So where could she be hidden? Isn't it more likely to be relatively far away? (10-30 miles)
 
  • #25,060

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
257
Guests online
3,154
Total visitors
3,411

Forum statistics

Threads
641,760
Messages
18,778,100
Members
244,863
Latest member
evvywoods
Back
Top