- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 7,418
- Reaction score
- 47,816
There is A suspect, so far, but no clue who it is. jmoI think they just mean whoever did the crime. Another way of saying the perpetrator(s)
There is A suspect, so far, but no clue who it is. jmoI think they just mean whoever did the crime. Another way of saying the perpetrator(s)
Valid point. Air bnb almost always have at least an exterior entry camera.JMO but I would doubt an Air B&B. I've never known one not to have cameras at least at all the entrances.
Motel with external room entry would likely have parking lot or walkway cameras, also risky.
I think this likely is not based on evidence that they have uncovered.Sheriff tells BBC he believes Nancy Guthrie being held close to her home
![]()
Watch: Sheriff tells BBC he believes Guthrie being held close to her home
Sheriff Chris Nanos, who is leading the hunt, said he was confident they would find her - whether it took "10 days, 10 months, or worse".bbc.com
I went through the early PCs recalling the sheriff saying exactly that. Could not find that PC yet. Perhaps someone can chime in on it.But if there was someone who entered the house from any entrance other than the front door where the camera was, they could open the front door and reach out with their hand and either remove the camera or cover it with something so that it could be removed without being seen on camera at all.
The Lydia Fairchild case (Washington state woman - The Case of Lydia Fairchild and Her Chimerism (2002) | Embryo Project Encyclopedia ) is fascinating to me. In a criminal sense, chimeras (organisms, including some humans that have two different sets of DNA, or the genetic material that contains instructions for the development and functioning of an organism, present in their bodies - What Is Chimerism?) would make it nearly impossible to identify suspects via DNA. This article from NIH discusses its ramifications in forensic science. The impact of chimerism in DNA-based forensic sex determination analysis - PMCDNA mismatches:
Washington state woman had two children with not the same DNA as her. Court case attempting to take her children. She was pregnant with third child, and jury members watched the birth. Same results. Not her DNA. Jury actually accused her of being a surrogate. Enter DNA specialist. Woman had two DNA present in her body. She kept her children.
DNA accused man of murder, but he was 100% in prison at time of murder. He had a twin. Identical twin's DNA did not match his either. Prosecutors had no idea. Dropped charge.
Alaska man needed a bone marrow transplant, but he had atypical DNA. Match found in Germany. Surgery to his arm. Four years later the man had completely become the donor's DNA - completely.
Good questions, but I’ve never seen answers.Do we have any sense of what occurred at 1:47? Disabled what? Disrupted wifi? Disrupted electricty? Disabled A camera but not ALL cameras?
I have questions.
JMO
1000 POSTS LATER, people speculating on AI vs real images and 2 perps...I dont think there were 2 perps. As everyone knows by now, I have felt from the beginning this was a kidnapper who had a delusional fascination with SG. She is his fantasy girlfriend .He is a marginalized, socially inadequate, man who has a poetic soul and finds his meaning in life through movies and TV. He is fixated on SG. Probably has an area in his home, like an altar, that has her photo, articles about her etc. He thinks when she is on the TODAY show that every word she speaks is CODE, directed at him. He became restless and decided he must have her but he can't. He went for her mom, instead. NOW HE HAS SG's attention. He also has a trophy..SG's mom. He may also have other trophies he took from the home, family photos, or lingerie from SG's old bedroom, for example.
MOTIVE will solve this case, imo. Obsessed stalker. Someone knows him and his devotion to SG. Watching the Today show daily, saving every program she is on, perhaps mentioning her during casual conversations once too often. This is not a 2 perp crime. This guy acted alone. MOO JMO
Agreed, but wow! What an incredible phenomenon. New to me.It's VERY statistically unlikely that NG's perp has this condition
Take off your glasses Jason. Let’s have a look at those eyes. Inserting yourself into the investigation? Kidding mostly.
Probably a good use of AI.Is there a way to compile as much information as possible and get an expert in AI to run algorithms to come up with new information that may not have looked at yet. Just a thought from left field.
Good afternoon everyone, catching up with what's happened today. I see there is another email to TMZ but didn't HL just yesterday say they weren't going to talk publicly about any further communication from this person or persons? What am I missing?
Unless, of course, my obsessed, love sick stalker is the true perp! He would have read that book! Kidnapping NG would be part of playing the game SG and her sister and friends played on the mom, in reverse..JMO
IF we live our lives realizing that virtually NOTHING is confidential anymore..even hospital data bases have been breached, Credit monitoring companies, etc etc.. that there are people also foolish enough to put their lives on Facebook and you can google just about anyone and find their address and phone number, you will understand that written consent and privacy, as we knew it or thought we knew it, is a dying concept. JMOPractically nothing is safe, though. However, let us say someone broke into a DNA company and found two close cousins of a criminal and through them, the criminal. Who can then prevent these cousins from suing both the company and LE? The company may say that their DNAs were not “critical” in the process, but: if they know that the cousin has been arrested, they understand that their DNAs and maybe, their trees had to be examined in the process, and it is enough to say: you looked at my DNA without my consent. Not because these cousins care about the criminal. They may be happy that he is caught. But at the same time, they didn’t give their written consent for a 3d party to look at their personal DNAs.
I doubt that an 84-year-old woman with health issues could survive 10 months in captivity. We don't even know if she survived 10 days.Sheriff tells BBC he believes Nancy Guthrie being held close to her home
![]()
Watch: Sheriff tells BBC he believes Guthrie being held close to her home
Sheriff Chris Nanos, who is leading the hunt, said he was confident they would find her - whether it took "10 days, 10 months, or worse".bbc.com
Maybe he said that to see if a prankster who's doing it for publicity would stop sending them knowing it wouldnt get posted? But I agree the timing of HL saying he's stopping and then next morning he announced new ransom note- sent is weird. That wouldn't set a good precedent if you're trying to determine if they're fake or not.Good afternoon everyone, catching up with what's happened today. I see there is another email to TMZ but didn't HL just yesterday say they weren't going to talk publicly about any further communication from this person or persons? What am I missing?
And that a criminal would continue to give her care for that amount of time.I doubt that an 84-year-old woman with health issues could survive 10 months in captivity.
I like the way you phrased this. Excellent way of wording.I think this likely is not based on evidence that they have uncovered.
It's likely base on evidence that they haven't been able to find or doesn't exist. JMO
What is it your have circled (in garden) in the photos?I’ve cropped the screenshots to approximate the same perspective as the unbackpacked man image. I tried to grab several of the same area for comparison. Hopefully obviously, I’ve not altered the images except bring up contrast and circling the area of interest.
Look at the differences.
I’ve added a postfacto screenshot from the other side that was on Fox News: Blood drops visible on the porch of Nancy Guthrie’s home | Fox News Video