GUILTY NC - PFC Kelli Bordeaux, 23, Fayetteville, 14 April 2012 - #3

[Eileen730]

VOH lead us to believe that they know each other from the bar and they came together that night. I'm guessing Kelli assumed it was a friend thing but Nick had other plans. Just a guess.

Yep! I knew he left with her i did not know he drove her thanks for the info!

 

[nursebeeme]

Holbert was not on parole; that was terminated April 2009. He was arrested because he failed to notify the State that he had changed his address, which is required of all sex offenders.

his last check in was 8 april (linked on one of the threads)

 

[spoiledmom]

I thought he was on a lifetime probation!

That is terrifying. All SO should be on lifetime probation. I am telling you that statistically they do not change. They always reoffend when given the opportunity.

 

[Eileen730]

We have no confirmation of anything that was driven. Reports have been He picked her up and dropped her off, He could have picked her up from the mall We dunno..

Where her car was. Where nicked picked her up from ,if he dropped her off. All we know for fact is
NH is the last one to admit seeing Kelli and he was in her company that night.

Didnt V say the bar owner has a cab service?
Could Nick be running his own little car service?

 

[Eileen730]

That is terrifying. All SO should be on lifetime probation. I am telling you that statistically they do not change. They always reoffend when given the opportunity.

Thats is what it listed on his rap sheet that someone here posted it says LIFETIME!

And yes all SO's should have a lifetime probation they do not change and as i see they go from rape to murder!

 

[spoiledmom]

Didnt V say the bar owner has a cab service?
Could Nick be running his own little car service?

He did say that but he said they are separate. God..I hope not.

 

[Gia]

I thought he was on a lifetime probation!

I don't know how accurate this would be (link below). But according to this site it says no probation. Would that info be somewhere else?

http://www.nsopw.gov/Core/ResultDetails.aspx?index=0&x=B4FB6BC1-16D7-48CC-A220-04FE820EA353

 

[Eileen730]

im trying to remember where i saw it !
It was last night and VOH wante da link to his record what he really did to this child and someone posted it then ill see if i can find it.

 

[LaLaw2000]

Holbert was not on parole; that was terminated April 2009. He was arrested because he failed to notify the State that he had changed his address, which is required of all sex offenders.

Right, sundrop. He was in violation of having failed to provide a very current address, IMO.

He also had a 'no insurance flag' on his vehicle, IIRC, and no clear title. Nurse had found this, I believe.

MOO

 

[nursebeeme]

I think the 8 april thing was maybe his sex offender check in?

Either way, he broke the rules of his sex offender status.

 

[LaLaw2000]

I think the 8 april thing was maybe his sex offender check in?

Either way, he broke the rules of his sex offender status.

I think it was time for his address check in and an updated photo to be posted as an SO. There has to be updated photos for his SO page. He has to do this for his entire lifetime, IMO.

 

[mamamia54]

I just want you all to know that since I seem to be having so much difficulty with the thumbs up button, I'm going to stop using it, and that doesn't at all mean that I don't fully or not agree with things that will be posted. Thanks.

 

[Eileen730]

LOL it was his registration period was lifetime
so sorry for the confusion here is the link i found it!

http://sexoffender.ncdoj.gov/details.aspx?SRN=016529S3

 

[Todd Picuyane]

As to the questions regarding sex offenders on social networking sites:

There are only three states that create felony-level statutes for "sex offender presence on a social networking site: Illinois, New York, and North Carolina. Louisiana is one other state that had a law, but that law had been struck down by a federal court (Clinton-appointed judge) because it was deemed to broad. As written, basically ANY site that required a profile, even tangentially, would have been outlawed. This would include email accounts associated with companies that also have social networking sites, such as gmail, yahoo mail, and aol mail. They are in the process of rewriting the law to specify social networking sites; however, the ACLU is planning on filing AGAIN based upon the senate-passed text of the new law.

I believe that this law should be federalized into SORNA, and furthermore, that there be a federal statute that designates ALL such usage. The reason that it must be at the federal level, and not the state level, is that the Internet is typically interstate/international in nature, and local laws cannot possibly keep up with the myriad of circumstances that come with incidental use of the Internet by RSO's. There are too many ways the ACLU can fight these laws the way the statutes are written. But if the laws are written into SORNA, that would take the regional federal courts out of play and force significant changes into standardizing the elimination of RSO's from the Internet.

However, that's neither here nor there. The second major issue is that Facebook and other sites have methods in which they can delete accounts of sex offenders. However, I BELIEVE THAT IS NOT ENOUGH. I believe that if there is confirmation that a sex offender has been found on a site, they should be able to immediately send such information to the AG office of all states the offender is registered in, as well as the states of any minors that are "friended" on the list for investigation. Furthermore, they should make it a CRIME for Facebook to delete the information without confirmation from the AG's of the states. (Yes, they can certainly restrict access, but they cannot delete the information.)

By the way, I am of the opinion that every sex offense involving children should be treated as a FEDERAL crime, even for local cases, for the very purpose of standardizing punishment and registration. When the myriad of state laws muddy the mix, we have the problems in which you see now, with jurisdictions not prosecuting obvious slam-dunk convictions of RSO's on Facebook in states that specify felonies for those offenses.

 

[nursebeeme]

I guess the media are on vacation this weekend... (darn shame they cannot provide an update)

 

[spoiledmom]

I agree Todd that LE needs to be informed that the SO has a FB account before it is deleted. That is why it is always good to get a screenshot and save the page before they have a chance to erase it.

 

[spoiledmom]

I am confused as to why it says that Nicks address was confirmed on April 8th when it was not his address. How far is Spring Lake from Froggy's? Anyone know?

 

[nursebeeme]

People who live and work in the North Ramsey Street area say they are following developments in the Bordeaux case. There's a sense, they say, that Bordeaux's disappearance is an isolated incident.

There's more concern about a woman, also a soldier, who was sexually assaulted in March while jogging on Carvers Falls Road.

That's less than a half-mile from the bar where Bordeaux was last seen.

There also are five still-unsolved rapes reported in the same area between August 2006 and February 2008.

Xan Hunter, a co-owner of Mopheads salon at the corner of Carvers Falls Road and Ramsey Street, said she and her co-workers are taking no chances.

"It's definitely made us more aware," she said.

"We've had a few husbands come in and check on us," Hunter said. "We tag-team going outside at night and don't go out in the back by ourselves."

http://fayobserver.com/articles/2012/04/20/1172578?sac=fo.local

 

[nursebeeme]

first I saw this:

The Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, which is investigating the attack of the jogger on Carvers Falls Road, has ruled out Holbert as a suspect in that case, a spokeswoman said Friday.

http://fayobserver.com/articles/2012/04/20/1172578?sac=fo.local

 

[Eileen730]

Hey has anyone brought up the Ramsey Street Rapist?
Or the soldier rapist?

Here is a link to an article and you have to read the forum below!
Its very interesting!

http://fayobserver.com/articles/2012/04/19/1172059?sac=