For me, I will state the obvious:
I think some of us (at least me) are hoping for some good solid evidence that shows that HE did did it, with no or few doubts -- and not just a negative feeling about him. CSI on TV has shown the perfect world of forensic science in murders, rapes, etc., and now we expect at least a bit of it -- we know that a case will not have a 5 minute solve rate with DNA, batches of blood on everyone, etc., etc., etc., but everyone -- especially the jury -- feels better with tangible & irrefutable evidence, especial if it is based on circumstantial evidence, which nearly all tuff cases are.
And I, like Softail said, am worrying about the paltry amount of facts against SM that we have seen/heard so far.
Just my o.