She went after low-income because their parents wouldn't be potential problems to deal with, imo.
I think part of the grooming process was to see which parents would object. Plenty of low-income parents would notice and put an end to the attention/"job" offers, but GM would just move on to a girl whose parents didn't notice or object.
I wonder if any parents were paid off or threatened into silence.
I wonder if Ghislaine could end up going to sex offender prison?
Where I taught school, many of the "parents" were usually a single mom, or grandmother, or aunt. And honestly, they probably would have encouraged this.
Precisely. Good insight into GM’s world. ( That was my world from 18-20 in NYC and my mother encouraged it 100 percent, in fact, she is the one who put it in my mind, and introduced me to extremely older men and threw me out of the house while I was in college having just turned nineteen. When I was 19 my “boyfriend” was 47 and owned a yacht. I showed her a bunch of money I had one day and she praised me saying let’s face it, your looks were always your best asset. I was totally willing at the time and desperate .j
Holy Smokes and all the cuss-words-I-know!!!! I just knew when I saw Cosby's vacated conviction, Maxwell would jump in with a dismissal filing, no time wasted. Rich and powerful!!Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan:
We respectfully submit this letter to bring to the Court’s attention the recent decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Henry Cosby Jr., J-100-2020 (Jun. 30, 2021), in which the Court vacated Mr. Cosby’s conviction and sentence because the District Attorney’s Office that prosecuted him failed to live up to its express promise not to prosecute Mr. Cosby for the same crimes for which he was later convicted.1 Ms. Maxwell’s case presents a similar situation. As we argued in our supplemental pretrial motions currently pending before the Court (Dkt. 293), the government has failed to abide by its promise not to prosecute Ms. Maxwell for the offenses for which she was immunized by the Epstein Non- Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”). We submit that this decision provides support for Ms. Maxwell’s supplemental motion to dismiss Counts One, Three, Five, and Six of the S2 Indictment for violation of the NPA.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.310.0.pdf
^^^^Anyone reading these?^^^^^
Unsealed court docs cont'd...
Insider July 18
GM can't for the life of her remember that she was on a few dozen plane rides with VG while VG was a minor, despite flight logs confirming they were both passengers on the same 23 Lolita Express trips.
Have you seen a picture of the plane? I always pictured some puddle jumper. It’s HUGE! Like you’d see a commercial airline put into service. I’m not saying she should have remembered, and is lying, but it’s a huge plane. I wonder how many passengers flew on it on a regular trip?