Wait, who said 30 seconds?! No one knows when the chokehold started. It could have been 1 minute 59 seconds before arriving at platform (although that doesn't leave any time for terrifying behavior), or 1 second before arriving platform (although would be... even more wild).
The same guy who is the journalist mentioned upthread - he's the guy he took the video. IIRC.
Eyewitness.
I agree that no one knows when it started, but several people are in the media stating what they think. That's what we go on here. I'm tired, at this point, going back through the thread, but everything I've read about this case is from WS. Here's something I found on my own (probably posted already):
When homeless man Jordan Neely boarded an F train in Manhattan on Monday, no one onboard could have fathomed that his lifeless body would be lying before them.
nypost.com
Maybe that's where the 30 seconds comes from. OTOH, I do believe the journalist mentions it too.
If it was 1:59 before arrival,
that means that Penny put the chokehold on after a few seconds of assessing threat. Are you saying that's a possibility? That Penny only waited 1-5 seconds until he approached Neely from behind?
I think all of the eyewitness statements need to be weighed against common sense and actual travel times between platforms.
1 second is absurd and no one I've read has said this. I posted my link earlier about the 30 seconds based on MSM posted here.
IMO. I never said anyone knows for sure - do you have a source that knows for sure?
Speculation as is most everything on this thread, at this time, IMO.
Truly interested in how you can conceive that the attack started 1 second after the train left the previous platform. Is this just to challenge others' accounts or do you have knowledge or a theory? No reason in trying to argue with other people's speculation (including Vazquez - I'll find his account again at some point, but it's been posted in several forms here).
IMO.