Now that we are learning details from the autopsy report a few things are becoming abundantly clear:
A "choke hold" was not applied to EG. The autopsy showed no damage to his windpipe which would be evident if he had been "choked"
The autopsy showed that blood was cut off to the brain as a result of his carotid arteries being compressed.
What these findings tells us is the officer was not using a choke hold but rather a special neck hold referred to as "carotid restraint" or "sleeper hold"
The sleeper hold which involves cutting off blood flow to the brain for a brief period is not forbidden by the NYPD in fact they are training their officers on the use of this special neck hold.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-lessons-force-lapd-article-1.1882111
For this reason alone I can see why the officer involved was not indicted. He was using a perfectly acceptable method to bring a non-compliant man who was resisting arrest to the ground.
I don't know why the autopsy report states COD as "COMPRESSION OF THE NECK (CHOKE HOLD)" when in fact there is no evidence that EG was choked. I thought autopsy reports are supposed to be very precise? I think the report should be corrected (the officer involved should insist on that). The report should state "COMPRESSION OF THE CAROTID ARTERIES (SLEEPER HOLD)"
Now that these facts have come to light the media needs to stop referring to this tragic incident as the "choke hold death of an unarmed man".