GUILTY NY - Vincent Viafore, 46, Newburgh, 19 April 2015 - #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #901
  • #902
Hudson Highlands.

There's a reason they used the gloman.

imgres


Hudson_Highlands_view_south_from_Breakneck_Ridge.jpg


Gloaming would only be used by the Scotch.
 
  • #903
JMOO, Portale is a freak lawyer, looking for fame.
I have good friends in WP. Pffft to Portale.

He's just looking for his 5 minutes of fame. Moo
Poor guy is gonna loose.

Ha, he only gets 5 minutes of fame.... (Andy Warhol gave us all 15 minutes)... Interesting how a lawyer's appearance and mannerisms can affect things... Same of course can be said of the defendant...
 
  • #904
I think it's a nice word. Old fashioned but I've heard it before, especially in poetry. However, although I thought it had something to do with misty darkness, I didn't know the definition until I read it here.




Me too. Something about her creeps
me out. But aside from that, this isn't a small, backwoods force, for example, pressured to solve a case or harboring an innate prejudice against Latvian Russians. There is no hint of corruption surrounding this force. The incident was treated as an accident and would've been left there but for the statements of Graswald. There was zero motivation for LE to coerce a confession. It's illogical.

Only problem, they could have used sunset etc.

They chose gloaming for a reason. IMO, it resonates with "The Highlands".
 
  • #905
Don't get me started or I'll go on to illustrate the myriad usages of the term 'gloaming' in poetry. Don't make me go full Charles Stuart Calverley on such a nice group of people!
 
  • #906
Don't get me started or I'll go on to illustrate the myriad usages of the term 'gloaming' in poetry. Don't make me go full Charles Stuart Calverley on such a nice group of people!

Go for it.

Thing is, we would never use that terminology here. Not in a million years.
 
  • #907
Go for it.

Thing is, we would never use that terminology here. Not in a million years.

I don't know about that. I felt certain the term is used here now and then so I looked. An American author wrote a short story called In The Gloaming. A movie with the same title was made here in 97 about a guy dying of AIDS.

On another subject, I want to say that criminal defense attorneys often make grandiose statements meant to support their clients' innocence that are purposefull misleading and have no basis in truth. Like, "a satanic cult in a black van took Laci. We are 100% going to prove Scott's innocence."

Or that Casey's dad molested the baby and threatened casey. Or that Travis Alexander was a pedophile who kept attacking jodi after being stabbed multiple times and his head practically severed from his neck.

It's the Chewabacca defense. Say something with enough conviction and people will believe it- that a quite articulate woman didn't understand what was
being said so she confessed in great, emotional detail to something she didn't do. Or that prosecutors who had zero motivation to do so coerced and are
falsely accusing the bereaved partner of an accident victim.
 
  • #908
Please forgive me.
SCOTS.
"Scotch" is a beverage ....and an adhesive tape. Thanks. Carry on.
 
  • #909
A prosecutorial charge is itself a grandiose statement, accusing a person of what remains to be proven.
 
  • #910
A prosecutorial charge is itself a grandiose statement, accusing a person of what remains to be proven.

With respect, that's nonsense. Criminal complaints are notoriously devoid of grandiose statements. They include bare, unromantic statements of fact and importantly, they aren't meant to mislead.

Further, those statements are based on actual evidence that was gathered in the course of a police investigation.
 
  • #911
I certainly will let my opinion stand.
 
  • #912
  • #913
  • #914
Taken from:
http://www.orangecountygov.com/filestorage/124/912/2014_Annual_Report.pdf

Of the 23 trials that resulted in verdicts, eighteen defendants were convicted and five were acquitted. The
overall 2014 felony conviction rate was 94%.

While I guess it's possible that the state doesn't have a case, I don't think it's probable. ;)
Impressive, a cut above the national average (93%, at least in 2012). In many murder cases the defense will posit an alternate killer; here, it's the Hudson, which has in its time claimed many victims -- a past history.
 
  • #915
But aside from that, this isn't a small, backwoods force, for example, pressured to solve a case or harboring an innate prejudice against Latvian Russians. There is no hint of corruption surrounding this force. The incident was treated as an accident and would've been left there but for the statements of Graswald. There was zero motivation for LE to coerce a confession. It's illogical.

100% agree with you!
 
  • #916
Impressive, a cut above the national average (93%, at least in 2012). In many murder cases the defense will posit an alternate killer; here, it's the Hudson, which has in its time claimed many victims -- a past history.

True enough! And I really believe the COD will end up being drowning but the problem for me is what would have caused a seemingly strong man known for his love of water activities to become so reckless as to not wear a life vest and cross to Bannerman's at the widest part they could've possibly found, all while being under the influence of alcohol. Why would he not have grabbed back onto his kayak?
 
  • #917
O/T: Are there any substances that can be given to someone in order to make them pass out that can't be detected through toxicology screens?
 
  • #918
Impressive, a cut above the national average (93%, at least in 2012). In many murder cases the defense will posit an alternate killer; here, it's the Hudson, which has in its time claimed many victims -- a past history.

And the prosecution will present the Hudson as the weapon with AG as the killer.
 
  • #919
  • #920
O/T: Are there any substances that can be given to someone in order to make them pass out that can't be detected through toxicology screens?

Not off topic since the toxicology report isn't back that I know of. I think I remember a Dateline where Chloroform was used to kill someone & went undetected for a while bc it isn't on a standard toxicology screen but I could be wrong. It was a husband who had ordered through his job in a hospital lab (?) and put it in his wife's smoothie. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
172
Guests online
1,370
Total visitors
1,542

Forum statistics

Threads
632,402
Messages
18,625,966
Members
243,136
Latest member
sluethsrus123
Back
Top