This is clearly a hot button case in the community in the media and in here. IMO it's in big part because it tangentially at least touches or alludes to an issue that is very polarizing and is often prefixed pro or anti. I think the elected DA grandstanded because of this ever since the start of the case.
And after today I think the elected Judge Oda also grandstanded too--big time. The defendant was convicted of the one charge --but Oda rather flatly made known that he thinks somehow she made the baby dead and he rebukes her for that. She wasn't convicted of nor being sentenced on that, but he really wanted to make his position clear. I notice he also hurried to explain why she was out on bond for years and IMO it all had the ring of assuring the community that he the judge wasn't a lightweight on this case.
I am NOT saying it's unethical or surprising. It's the way elected officials across the spectrum function, they posture and perform and make points. But I don't think the acquittal on all the major charges will hurt the DA or judge with their constituency or honestly their donors. IMO it will be a 'well at least he tried' situation.
I was shocked by the judge’s statements and felt he was out of line. Who is he to say that in his heart he KNOWS that....”Annabelle”... would be here today. Way too much editorializing via his own opinion, IMO.
(I agree with him, but those should have been his private thoughts, not public, on-the-record parts of her sentencing.)