How often do we see bodies removed from crime scenes? Not often, IMO. Because the crime scenes were at isolated locations, and reporters easily kept at a distance, it doesn't surprise me at all that we did not see the removal of the bodies. Besides, what does it even matter? Some of the surviving relatives have granted interviews. None of them indicated anything other than that 2 bodies were found in one location, 2 in another, 3 in another, and 1 in the camper. I'm sure they were asked to corroborate the number of people living/sleeping at each location, just to ensure that everyone was accounted for. If someone was not immediately accounted for, the relatives on scene would have known about it. A frantic search would have ensued. Nothing like that happened. The bodies that were supposed to be in each location were there. So, not seeing the bodies removed does not seem important at all, IMO. Same goes for the plants. Do you think LE lied about the plants? Again, the surviving relatives have granted some interviews. If there was any doubt about the plants, they surely would have raised it. I mean, I don't think this family is giving LE a free pass to make up stories. Just the opposite. If they heard LE make a bogus claim, they'd probably raise a ruckus. And, finally, moving the mobile homes might not happen often, but it's not unprecedented. In this case, LE had a good explanation for it -- that is, making sure the crime scenes were secure, preventing damage from vandals, and saving costs. Nothing about the explanation seems dubious to me.
