In the article Columbus Dispatch, Mike, AG, states "We believe the law says they don't have to be released". The operative word being BELIEVE, as if LE can interpret that law to read however they want to read depending on the situation they are dealing with.
I was visiting with a cop in Kansas one time, asking him why one person could be pulled over and arrested for no driver's license, and another person could be pulled over for no driver's license and no insurance and given tickets. He told me the new law said that was at the discretion of the officer. I think that type of law is total BS! The law shouldn't allow for the officer to make the decision. That's discrimination in my book!
The problem with Mike D's statement is the fact it does not say anything about LE's "discretion", although it appears they are trying to convince us the law says that.
I was visiting with a cop in Kansas one time, asking him why one person could be pulled over and arrested for no driver's license, and another person could be pulled over for no driver's license and no insurance and given tickets. He told me the new law said that was at the discretion of the officer. I think that type of law is total BS! The law shouldn't allow for the officer to make the decision. That's discrimination in my book!
The problem with Mike D's statement is the fact it does not say anything about LE's "discretion", although it appears they are trying to convince us the law says that.