Right? I guess every bartender or server should be given the side-eye nowadays.When did it become illegal to have cash?
the same time it became illegal to be hanging around home depot with other brown people looking for day labor, I think.When did it become illegal to have cash?
From Mehdi Hasan’s article:
In the eyes of this administration, immigrants who are undocumented are all “illegal immigrants” and these “illegal immigrants”, ergo, are all “criminals”.
But, on so many levels, it’s just not true. It’s a popular myth pushed by the right that needs urgent debunking.
First, people are not, are never, illegal. It was the Nobel laureate and former Auschwitz prisoner Elie Wiesel who pointed out how “no human being is ‘illegal’” because it is “a contradiction in terms. People can be beautiful or less beautiful, they can be just or unjust, but illegal? How can a human being be illegal?”
An act can be illegal; people cannot inherently be illegal.
Second, the anti-immigrant right has not only gotten the language wrong but the law wrong, too. Under the US criminal code, as the ACLU has noted: “The act of being present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws is not, standing alone, a crime.” Why? Because illegal entry is considered a misdemeanor not a felony, under 8 US Code § 1325, and is subject to civil, and not criminal, penalties. It is the “reentry of removed aliens”, under 8 US Code § 1326, that is considered a felony and subject to criminal punishment.
Meanwhile, almost half of undocumented immigrants in the United States did not even enter the country illegally to begin with; many of them are “overstays” who arrived with a legal work, student, or travel visa but failed to leave the US, for a multiplicity of reasons, before their visas expired.
The inconvenient truth for the anti-immigrant right is that it is not a crime for immigrants simply to be present in the United States without proper documentation. They are not “illegals”. Don’t take my word for it. Or the ACLU’s. Take the word – the 5-3 majority ruling! – of the supreme court of the United States. In 2012, in Arizona v United States, the highest court in the land ruled that “as a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain in the United States”.
Got that? Not. A. Crime.
Lol, someone needs to tell Kristi Noem she was acting illegally yesterday when she had $3000 stolen with her purse whilst dining outWhen did it become illegal to have cash?
Not sure if they lived in Maryland, or what state they lived in at the time, but of note is that it appears no criminal charges of domestic battery were laid by LE. As the wife explained, her fear was based on a prior relationship and she sought "a civil protective order, in case things escalated". Things did not escalate.Wow! Since when has beating your spouse been acceptable. I think it may have some bearing on whether or not he is allowed to stay in the country, if he’s ever returned. imo
He doesn't have to be "sent" anywhere. He needs to be released from the barbaric El Salvador prison. Once released, he should be free to return to his home. If that is not possible, he should fly to Canada and declare refugees status as a person of political persecution in the USA.My point isn’t meaningless. If he is sent back to the US, the spousal abuse will be relevant in determining if he is allowed to remain here. imo
Others may choose to ignore the wife’s claims because it suits their narrative but I don’t think anyone here is okay with abuse.
It’s a complete fallacy to say that someone deserving due process equates to justifying spousal abuse.Wow! Since when has beating your spouse been acceptable. I think it may have some bearing on whether or not he is allowed to stay in the country, if he’s ever returned. imo
Class action lawsuits possible, according to a federal judge .....
The order also grants class-action status to non-US citizens facing removal orders and may be sent to a country not designated in their initial immigration proceedings.
The order cites hundreds of potential class members.
The court explained, “What Plaintiffs challenge is Defendants’ authority to effectively depart from the removal orders by designating new countries for removal outside of the immigration proceedings and, in doing so, circumvent Plaintiffs’ due-process rights…”
![]()
A U.S. judge has halted the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to deport non-citizens | News.az
A federal judge in Massachusetts on Friday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) p...news.az
I am beginning to not recognize this country as the America I grew up in- we are in deep trouble and it is just the beginning. We are not being governed: we are being ruled by a wannabe king.![]()
Venezuelan migrant whose deportation was blocked by SCOTUS speaks out
19-year-old Venezuelan migrant Alessandro Paredes spoke to ABC News from a detention center in Texas after his deportation was blocked by the Supreme Court.abcnews.go.com
“Paredes claimed to ABC News he and others were "forced to sign a paper" saying they are part of a gang. On Friday, the ACLU submitted a document they say their clients at Bluebonnet received from immigration officials. The document, titled "Notice and Warrant of Apprehension and Removal under the Alien Enemies Act," says, "You have been determined to be... a member of Tren de Aragua.
"We have been forced to sign a paper, right here, basically saying that we are part of a gang, that we are part of it, and they're forcing us to sign it," Paredes said.”
As someone whose mother’s entire side of the family survived Nazi POW camps, this is chilling. I grew up hearing stories about what happens when governments start demanding false confessions and how prisoners were beaten, starved, or manipulated into signing statements used to justify their own punishment. It’s a tactic with a long, dark history. Coerced confessions are used by authoritarian regimes to turn victims into “criminals” on paper - just enough to make the public look away.
This isn’t just about migrants. It’s about what kind of government we’re allowing to take shape. If ICE can get away with this in the shadows, how long until these tactics surface elsewhere? MOO
I feel the same. The way immigration laws are being applied now is unrecognizable compared to even 20 years ago. We’ve gone from processing asylum seekers to detaining them indefinitely, deporting without hearings, and now, possibly coercing false confessions to justify removals. It’s not just stricter enforcement, it’s a cruel shift in how power is being used. And once that kind of authority is normalized, it won’t stop with migrants. Every tactic that is being used against migrants will be used against born citizens if we continue to allow our first amendment rights to erode. MOO.I am beginning to not recognize this country as the America I grew up in- we are in deep trouble and it is just the beginning. We are not being governed: we are being ruled by a wannabe king.
BBMThe point your trying to argue is meaningless here. If he's an immigrant in this country illegally, then he still is owed due process. Just because dear leader says he has tattoos doesn't mean he gets kicked out without any chance to defend himself. The Supreme Court has voted 9-0 regarding this issue. Is your assertion then that the Supreme Court should be ignored? That's kind of funny for someone who is so law & order. JMO
BBM
“Dear Lying Leader” even showed a faked photo of Mr Abrego Garcia’s hand with “MS13” photoshopped onto his fingers. Of course MAGAs are saying the Trump photo was just showing that his tattoos “mean” MS13. But that isn’t what Trump said.
![]()
Does Kilmar Abrego Garcia have 'MS-13' tattooed on his hand? What we know
President Trump claimed that Abrego Garcia's tattoos marked him as an MS-13 member, though critics said there was no relation.www.newsweek.com
![]()
Internet Sleuths Slam Trump for Photoshopping MS-13 Tat on Deported Dad’s Hand
Social media users are accusing President Donald Trump of photoshopping an image he posted of a tattoo on deported dad Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s hand that the president argued represented the MS-13 gang. “This is the hand of the man that the Democrats feel should be brought back to the United...www.yahoo.com
In any case, MS13 or not, Mr Abrego García deserves due process as do the rest of the group sent to El Salvador.
JMO
I am beginning to not recognize this country as the America I grew up in- we are in deep trouble and it is just the beginning. We are not being governed: we are being ruled by a wannabe king.
Just like the manufactured DOJ "people trafficking" thing. Made up.
No MS-13 visible on this image, so would say it's photoshopped
Moo
My point isn’t meaningless. If he is sent back to the US, the spousal abuse will be relevant in determining if he is allowed to remain here. imo
Others may choose to ignore the wife’s claims because it suits their narrative but I don’t think anyone here is okay with abuse.