The idea that Joran was framed in Aruba--ridiculous on it's face. How then to explain Joran's lies about that night, his later confessions, or who actually killed Natalee? And how to explain why Joran took Stephany's money or her car? This time there is going to be forensic evidence: blood on his clthes and shoes, DNA on her clothes and body, DNA in the room and her car, the videos that show no one else entering or leaving, DNA on any weapon the killer used. Who even new Joran was in Peru or staying at that hotel? There is evidence that he had just met Stephany and witnesses to testify to that meeting, as well as video.
The only ways to believe that Joran was "framed" is to believe that people with no criminal records murdered Stephany to frame him and LE in Peru would fake the forensics and coerce a false confession AND that her prominent father would either never find out about that or go along with it. OR that Joran framed himself, in both cases. While false confessions to LE are fairly common, normal people don't tell their friends and acquaintances that they've killed someone (or been present at a death) and then covered it up. I suppose a book that argues that Joran is the innocent victim of a conspiracy--involving two foreign governments and an American family bent on framing him--to destroy the life of a victimized teenage boy from Aruba will sell a few copies, but not to me or anyone who ever cared about Natalee or Stephany or other victims of remorseless predators. Just my opinion, of course.