I hope that we have an appellate attorney from Idaho who can clarify this. I saw an attorney on TV that we all know saying that there is, perhaps, the possibility that he could raise ineffective assistance of counsel between now and sentencing to appeal. Sounds like they need to be sure they dot every I and cross every T between now and the sentencing is vital. Therefore, I think the judge made the prudent decision because what is the sense of blowing it all up over waiting just another six days? I think after sentencing, he cannot appeal.
But I would like to hear from an appellate attorney, the difference between keeping the record sealed until after sentencing versus not, and more importantly, does he still have the right to appeal anything that happened up until his sentencing? That doesn't seem to make sense. In other words, once we get to sentencing next week, at that point, aren't all of his appellate options off the table?
Anyone questioning that this plea deal wasn't a good maneuver just needs to look at what's happening with this right now. Anne Taylor is one hell of an attorney and you can only imagine how many tricks she had up her sleeve by the time four months of a trial went by.