- Joined
- Oct 30, 2005
- Messages
- 3,916
- Reaction score
- 23,082
Thanks, Warwick7. I'm glad you reposted this--and thanks for doing that on the last thread. This is a fascinating interview. One thing I learned is that the simple device of turning off the phone before committing a crime is evidence in itself, first because that is not the killer's usual pattern, and second because it's part of a number of other actions preparing for the crime. The Cellebrite experts also made me wonder even about the value of leaving the phone behind, if that also in not usual for the killer. I hope everyone watches this video. The Cellebrite experts show so much evidence that would have come out at trial.I never caught before BK turned his wifi 2 days before the murder.
And thanks also, MassGuy, for posting all the WSU documents. We're getting a much fuller picture on how aberrant this guy really is between his bizarre behavior toward women at WSU and his controlling and dependent behavior in his relationship with his mother. Inmate hated and wanted to control women; I love to hear a top psychologist consider his insistence on speaking to his mother on demand in terms of control of her and dependency on her. It's likely that his parents hoped that going to grad school in Washington was the launch into adulthood that they hoped for. But the phone calls must have shown them he would never actually launch. No wonder the dad flew out to escort him back--he wouldn't have been able to spend hours every day talking to his mother if they were on the road.
Last edited: