RDI Theories & Discussion ONLY!

  • #981
I wonder if BR could have reached the latch on the top of the door if he stood on the chair that was nearby? Another thing.....were there 2 white blankets in the wc, or 1. I know I read somewhere that JB and her parents had the same white blankets on their beds; of course the one on the parents would be larger.

Immediately after death, her body would be more pliable......would BR have been able to put her farther back in the WC, and later she was wrapped in the blanket and moved by JR? Yet, it seems, that being wrapped papoose style in the blanket would be something a Mother would do.
 
  • #982
BBM
Indeed, UKGUY, WHY be so distant from your distraught wife and ferret your son away if you think your daughter is missing and away from the house, possibly never to be returned safely now, since the police were called in. You would clutch your remaining child for all he's worth, IMO, especially if he did not know a thing and would necessarily be distraught and in need of parental comforting.

Now, not so fast on PR's forensic evidence being all over JB and not JR's. PR's fibers COULD have gotten in the places we know about by secondary transfer....not probable, granted, but still possible. And remember, investigators told JR that they had evidence the fibers from his special wool shirt were found inside the crotch of those (dang em anyway) size 12 Bloomies. I would say that INSIDE the crotch is not so likely to be through secondary transfer, but in all fairness, I suppose we have to consider it possible. I mean, JR did....he replied: " bull**** " and a few other crass comments when he was questioned about it.

Wasn't it your Shakespeare who penned the line, "methinks thou doest protesteth too loudly"?:notgood:

This is for DeeDee249, who has patiently gone over the liver mortis aspect of JB being moved so many times and some of us still have a hard time grasping: IF JB had been placed in the same position elsewhere in the house, and then somehow put into the wine cellar between the time FW saw nothing and JR "found" her there, wouldn't there have been an additional liver mortis pattern, or would there be no additional patterns seen if she were carefully lifted up and placed down in the same position?


midwest mama,
ITA with all your points. JR's behavior that morning was not that of a concerned parent, more that of a parent desperately attempting to cover something up?

I reckon JR's fibers represent primary transfer, i.e he redressed JonBenet in the size-12's without PR's knowledge, this is reflected in her version of events regarding the size-12's since she only needed to offer an account consistent with what she knew about the size-12's. JR likely told PR you write the note and I'll deal with JonBenet? JR protests too much even that his relationship with JonBenet has been discredited.

By the time JR decided to relocate JonBenet first or on the speculative second move, i.e. after FW checks the wine-cellar, the livor mortis could have been set in place, particularly if JonBenet had been killed prior to midnight on the 25th.

When I suggest JonBenet was portable this refers to the assumption she was wrapped in the white blanket and moved from, say her bedroom, to the basement. If she was always lying on her back, or whatever her resting position was, enveloped by the white blanket this would afford her some respite from any other surface she came in contact with, particularly as the livor mortis process began to end.

Livor mortis patterns are excellent at determining the movement of a body soon after death, the points of contact with the body to the ground surface are always pale in distinction to other areas where blood pools to reflect it being drawn by gravity, so any reorientation of the body will result in further livor mortis patterns.

If JonBenet was simply lifted and placed down in the same position as she was relocated, still wrapped in the white blanket, and towards the end of the lividity process then there might be no new lividity pattern?

note: Lividity becomes fixed after about six hours minimum and approximately eight hours maximum.


.
 
  • #983
I wonder if BR could have reached the latch on the top of the door if he stood on the chair that was nearby? Another thing.....were there 2 white blankets in the wc, or 1. I know I read somewhere that JB and her parents had the same white blankets on their beds; of course the one on the parents would be larger.

Immediately after death, her body would be more pliable......would BR have been able to put her farther back in the WC, and later she was wrapped in the blanket and moved by JR? Yet, it seems, that being wrapped papoose style in the blanket would be something a Mother would do.

Darlene733510,
James Kolar has stated that BR had already visited the wine-cellar that day, so either the WC door was left jammed open as default, or he could reach as you suggest.

Good question about the blankets. I'm not certain about the answer, but there has been similar questions before where evidence was restated.

Papoose style might indicate a maternal style it might also reflect a desire to minimise forensic transfer. Bearing in mind that JR's shirt fibers are to be found deep within the papoose makes one wonder what came first?

.
 
  • #984
BBM
Indeed, UKGUY, WHY be so distant from your distraught wife and ferret your son away if you think your daughter is missing and away from the house, possibly never to be returned safely now, since the police were called in. You would clutch your remaining child for all he's worth, IMO, especially if he did not know a thing and would necessarily be distraught and in need of parental comforting.

Now, not so fast on PR's forensic evidence being all over JB and not JR's. PR's fibers COULD have gotten in the places we know about by secondary transfer....not probable, granted, but still possible. And remember, investigators told JR that they had evidence the fibers from his special wool shirt were found inside the crotch of those (dang em anyway) size 12 Bloomies. I would say that INSIDE the crotch is not so likely to be through secondary transfer, but in all fairness, I suppose we have to consider it possible. I mean, JR did....he replied: " bull**** " and a few other crass comments when he was questioned about it.

Wasn't it your Shakespeare who penned the line, "methinks thou doest protesteth too loudly"?:notgood:

This is for DeeDee249, who has patiently gone over the liver mortis aspect of JB being moved so many times and some of us still have a hard time grasping: IF JB had been placed in the same position elsewhere in the house, and then somehow put into the wine cellar between the time FW saw nothing and JR "found" her there, wouldn't there have been an additional liver mortis pattern, or would there be no additional patterns seen if she were carefully lifted up and placed down in the same position?

Glad to try again: Livor Mortis occurs when blood in a dead body is pulled by gravity to the parts of the body closest to the floor or ground. Livor Mortis has TWO stages- blanching (also known as non-fixed) and Non-Blanching (fixed). When you press a finger into your body, usually in a leg or arm is easiest to see, there will be a small white area under where your finger pressed when you take your finger away. That white spot is called "blanching". In a LIVE person, the blood rushes back into the space when whatever made the pressure is removed. Not in a dead body. In a dead body, when livor forms, in the first stage the blood is still somewhat liquid, even though it is no longer circulating. That is the NON-FIXED-blanching stage. The blood will move around when you move the body, and will move away under the skin when something presses into it (such as the folds in clothing). So the position a body is in makes the first livor pattern. In JB's case, the livor pattern was on the right side of her face (her head was cocked to the right) and on her back. This is consistent with the position she was in when her body was found- lying on her back, head cocked to the right. Had her body been moved during this first NON-FIXED -BLANCHING stage, another liver pattern would have formed IN ADDITION to the original one. There were NO OTHER livor patterns found. JB back, in the autopsy photos, shows the white marks from the folds of her shirt.
However, IF the body was moved during the second stage (the FIXED - NON-BLANCHNG stage) NO other pattern would form because at that point the blood has gelled and is no longer liquid.
Things pressed into a body during blanching make a white mark, and that mark remains even when livor becomes fixed. Had she been already dead, the ligature furrows would be white, even after the coroner cut the ligature off.
To answer your question, YES, there would have been an additional pattern if she was moved but ONLY during the non-fixed stage. Even if she were picked up carefully and placed in the same position, I cannot imagine it being done SO carefully that the body would not move at all.
Livor mortis is one of the things that determined whether a body has been moved (along with other things like fiber evidence or other debris found on a body) and is admissible in court.
From the time of JB's death (approx between midnight and 1 AM) and the time of the first people arriving at the house was 6-7 hours. Livor was likely fixed by then. BUT- rigor mortis was progressing. Manipulating a body will BREAK rigor, and once broken, it will not re-form. So that is why I am so adamant about JB not having been in a suitcase, freezer, under something, etc. There would either be another livor pattern OR evidence of broken rigor. The most that could have happened is she'd have been carried UPRIGHT in the position JR carried her upstairs in if she was moved. JR did not break her rigor when he carried her up this way. But had he put her over his shoulder, bent her legs across his arms, or any other more forceful movement, rigor would break, and the coroner would know it. She was in FULL unbroken rigor when the coroner first saw the body, and by the autopsy on the morning of the 27th, rigor was beginning to fade in some joints.
I like to use this analogy (and scroll down if you are tired of seeing it):
Imagine a bowl of red Jello. Freshly made it is still liquid and will slosh around when you move the bowl. But as it sets, it "gels" or thickens. If you tilt the bowl, some of it will stick to the sides of the bowl and remain there in place. If you pick it up a second time, it will make another pattern, over the first, but the first pattern remains. But after more time has passed, the Jello has completely gelled and even if you move the bowl around, it will not make another pattern.
 
  • #985
Regarding the ransom note. If you removed the header ("To John Ramsey" part), and sent the note to say the police. How would you know that the ransom note even relates to the Ramseys?

That header is important, especially if you want the ransom note to work as a piece of fake evidence.
 
  • #986
Regarding the ransom note. If you removed the header ("To John Ramsey" part), and sent the note to say the police. How would you know that the ransom note even relates to the Ramseys?

That header is important, especially if you want the ransom note to work as a piece of fake evidence.

Not really sure what you are getting at? Its addressed to John and his name is mentioned numerous times. What more would there be?
 
  • #987
Recently went back to some chapters in FF. What interested me was Kolar’s explanation of his considerations in the writing of his book.

When Kolar looked at the tragedies in the R family – Patsy’s cancer, the loss of Beth Ramsey, the death of JonBenet, he had second thoughts about putting his analysis to paper. While he believes there was no intruder, it seems that he wasn’t sure writing the book would accomplish much beyond causing the family additional anguish. What pushed him over the edge was, among his reasons, ML’s arrest of JMK and the ongoing R accusations towards the work of the BPD. Many fine careers were ruined. In addition to seeking a kind of justice for a destroyed child (the truth, even if no courtroom trial), Kolar felt there were some things he needed to say, to set the record straight so to speak.

RE ML. I’d never seen a recap of the interview and arrest of JMK and thought this worth bringing to light. It was originally uncovered by attorneys Caplis and Silverman and spoken of on the air. Here it is published in a blog labeled Politically Incorrect in Boulder written by a Boulder resident. His blog in 2006 was subtitled Boulder DA Mary Lacy is incompetent.

This blog sheds some light on why ML’s actions must have truly contributed to compelling Kolar to write his book. Read the entire article here: http://piboulder.wordpress.com/2006/09/08/boulder-da-mary-lacy-is-incompetent/

And a snippet:
I listened to Caplis and Silverman a local Denver talk radio show on 630 AM KHOW today. They’ve been pursuing public records related to this investigation. What they’ve found so far is discouraging. It sounds like rank incompetence on the part of Boulder DA Mary Lacy. Caplis and Silverman obtained the transcript of the interview Boulder DA investigators had with John Karr in Thailand. They asked him about how he came up with the figure of $118,000 in the ransom note. He said he knew he couldn’t get $1 million, so he settled on $100,000. Then he remembered that the age of consent is 18, so he added $18,000 onto it. Caplis and Silverman saw this as a red flag. As someone who had married a 13-year-old woman, and had a sexual obsession about little girls, he had to know what the age of consent was for marriage, sex, and that sort of thing, and it’s not 18.

The real red flag for me out of it, was the investigators asked Karr where he was December 25, 1996. He didn’t say Boulder, CO. He said he was in Hamilton, Alabama, and that his family would be able to confirm this. Then he added, “But I could’ve taken a Learjet.” Uh huh…(sigh). He said this before he was brought to the U.S. If nothing else cut to the heart of his credibility, this should’ve been it. Granted, getting the DNA test from him there as well would’ve been nice (they tried 3 times, but he refused), just to be absolutely sure. But his story was just a shambles. What really was there to go on? Mary Lacy brought him to the U.S. anyway. They got the DNA test done, and surprise, surprise, he wasn’t the guy. I think a more experienced DA would’ve just left him in Thailand for others to deal with.

~RSBM~
One of the other aspects that prompted the hasty arrest, was “public safety”–in Thailand. No joke. The DA’s office used “public safety” as a reason to arrest him before investigating further. Apparently they were receiving information that he was about to do something criminal with a child over there. Maybe it’s just me, but I think most DAs would’ve said, “That’s Thailand’s problem.”

:gaah: MHO, of course
 
  • #988
I was wrapping up some Christmas gifts earlier and JB was on my mind. I can imagine the whole family being excited for Christmas and PR wrapping the gifts for her children. But then everything comes to mind about the R's party on the 23rd and so on. Imo I believe JB looked sick at that party and even the photos tell me this. I just wonder if something happened at that party that had to do with her. And she was obviously being molested by someone, and I have read that JR was away alot and she talked about missing him. PR loved her kids but I think she neglected them alot, she couldnt remember the last time JB bathed even. So I just wonder with JR being gone alot and P and the kids being there and her not paying attention to them like she should, who could have been molesting her? And I remember someone told me here on a post that she had become very clingy, and usually saw the nurse at school on a monday. This case just boggles me all the time with so many unanswered questions. Anyways, as I was wrapping the presents for my children I was thinking about them. I dont know who did what, and do not know why AH came forward and said the GJ did not return an indictment, which in fact they had, and he was even known to have suspected BR, he said lack of evidence but i suspect something else. But PR and JR were indicted so that should have been made public and went to trial
 
  • #989
Remember the "something else" you (and many of us) suspect could NOT have been mentioned. Not to defend him, because I think he is despicable, but he was simply not allowed to say "the GJ returned an indictment against the parents because they covered up for their son". BR could not be mentioned by name or inference at ALL. So to make it easy for himself and to end the questions and put the matter to rest, he said no indictments had been returned. He lied. And it seems like that should be a prosecutable offense. He violated the public trust and insulted the office he was sworn to uphold.
 
  • #990
Before anyone hangs Alex Hunter out to dry, keep in mind that all Grand Jury findings and dealings are NEVER publicly disclosed. It took 10+ years for this Grand Jury's decision to become public. It's to protect the everyday civilians who are elected for Jury duty.
 
  • #991
Remember the "something else" you (and many of us) suspect could NOT have been mentioned. Not to defend him, because I think he is despicable, but he was simply not allowed to say "the GJ returned an indictment against the parents because they covered up for their son". BR could not be mentioned by name or inference at ALL. So to make it easy for himself and to end the questions and put the matter to rest, he said no indictments had been returned. He lied. And it seems like that should be a prosecutable offense. He violated the public trust and insulted the office he was sworn to uphold.
Exactly DeeDee... He could not have said anything about who (some) suspect and imo this is the whole reason he didnt want to convene a GJ, maybe he already knew. He knew someone could not be prosecuted but the parents could have, but wouldnt that have brought up more questions about them as being "accessories" and he couldnt do that if it had actually been who we suspect because wouldnt that have brought his name about? Could he not have said what the indictment actually was all those years ago( all this time the public knowing no indictment had been issused until last year) and still keep someone under wraps and the parents actually being charged(I do not know about all this legal stuff)
 
  • #992
Sorry, not buying the idea that AH was protecting Burke when he lied about the GJ findings. I don't think there is evidence that conclusively points to Burke anyway. The GJ simply found that what happened that night was likely caused by one of the three people in that house. As all three were being deceitful and uncooperative and evidence was likely planted or tampered with, there is no way to pinpoint who did what. They couldn't pin the murder on any of them but they believed their was enough evidence to charge the parents with the coverup. In no way does that suggest that Burke was responsible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #993
We also dont have any idea about all the evidence either. So we dont know what was in those other 14 pages of the GJ, and why they werent released.
 
  • #994
Yes, kind of odd that the Colorado legal system feels the public has no right to know the details of this case, yet every person involved in it has been free to write a book about it.

The people of Colorado should be up in arms about this case because something very fishy went on.
 
  • #995
Sorry, not buying the idea that AH was protecting Burke when he lied about the GJ findings. I don't think there is evidence that conclusively points to Burke anyway. The GJ simply found that what happened that night was likely caused by one of the three people in that house. As all three were being deceitful and uncooperative and evidence was likely planted or tampered with, there is no way to pinpoint who did what. They couldn't pin the murder on any of them but they believed their was enough evidence to charge the parents with the coverup. In no way does that suggest that Burke was responsible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe it does. The indictments are worded in a way that states that they lied to protect the person who did it. Both parents' indictments read the same way.
 
  • #996
  • #997
Sorry, not buying the idea that AH was protecting Burke when he lied about the GJ findings. I don't think there is evidence that conclusively points to Burke anyway. The GJ simply found that what happened that night was likely caused by one of the three people in that house. As all three were being deceitful and uncooperative and evidence was likely planted or tampered with, there is no way to pinpoint who did what. They couldn't pin the murder on any of them but they believed their was enough evidence to charge the parents with the coverup. In no way does that suggest that Burke was responsible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I lean towards your interpretation because the true bills said the R's rendered assistance to someone who committed "first degree murder" of their daughter. Burke could not have been considered responsible for "first degree murder" due to his age, so how could the reference be of him?
 
  • #998
I lean towards your interpretation because the true bills said the R's rendered assistance to someone who committed "first degree murder" of their daughter. Burke could not have been considered responsible for "first degree murder" due to his age, so how could the reference be of him?

midwest mama,
Either of the R's, as charged, could have been responsible for "first degree murder" with the other assisting. Assisting is not exclusive of "first degree murder." i.e. both can assist and one can kill!

BR can be considered as responsible for "first degree murder", only that he cannot be held culpable or be named as such.

The legalese in the true bill is designed to obscure who may have done what. Not being familiar with GJ procedure, I'm not certain whether the GJ would be told or offered evidence to support a BDI, yet be told it cannot fly for legal reasons?

Patently the GJ recognized that staging had taken place, so they charged the parents with assisting with "first degree murder". This is not inconsistent with assuming PR asphyxiated JonBenet with the ligature.

Does the fact that AH lied not tell you something? It cannot be simply to protect the parents since they have been named on a true bill, which will become public knowledge one day.

Also the parents continued with their public presentation of an IDI, despite being charged, i.e. they colluded with AH to maintain the pretence of an IDI.

So did the GJ consider BR's involvement only to be told he is off limits?

.
 
  • #999
Sorry, not buying the idea that AH was protecting Burke when he lied about the GJ findings. I don't think there is evidence that conclusively points to Burke anyway. The GJ simply found that what happened that night was likely caused by one of the three people in that house. As all three were being deceitful and uncooperative and evidence was likely planted or tampered with, there is no way to pinpoint who did what. They couldn't pin the murder on any of them but they believed their was enough evidence to charge the parents with the coverup. In no way does that suggest that Burke was responsible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

andreww,
AH was protecting someone, and could it not be the parents since they were named on a true bill. The GJ were following legal procedure so were constrained. Here at WS we are not, we can speculate as to why AH and the parents colluded to minimize particular evidence and obscure other aspects.

Given the forensic evidence linking BR to all the assumed crime-scenes then a BDI is not inconsistent with the evidence.

Neither a PDI or JDI reach this level of consistency i.e. JR would make sure none of his fibers were to be found on JonBenet's groin and PR would make sure none of her fibers were to be found on any crime-scene artifact, particularly any related directly with a staged item, e.g. paintbrush handle/ligature.

.
 
  • #1,000

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
1,532
Total visitors
1,615

Forum statistics

Threads
632,330
Messages
18,624,785
Members
243,091
Latest member
ajf
Back
Top