Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 11/3/14 Hearing - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
This case is such a hot mess. And it's such a damn shame that Nurmi was allowed to file this PUBLICLY while he fights to have everything else filed under seal and in secret. I bet Travis's family are heartbroken and furious tonight. No wonder Nurmi looks so horrid. Look what he has to do to a good person in the name of trying to free the devil herself. Karma is quite the ***** and it looks like it's taking it's revenge on Nurmi.
 
  • #662
If the DT can get this down and dirty, what's to stop them from creating /tampering with evidence? This DT with its total lack of integrity has clean hands? Why does no one question the lengths to which they might go?

I was thinking the same thing, then I thought..nahh couldn't be, but then...

Any real fear I have of this being true is if Det Flores turned that computer over to some pale-skinned pimply-faced junk-food tainted geekwad who just threw the JA case trying to protect TA's rep. And I'm sorry for putting this out there, but I'm a bit worried.
 
  • #663
  • #664
And who puts laptops in with dirty clothes. And just how sis her hard drive get destroyed? How convenient don't ya think?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Isn't it interesting that Jodi's hard drive (external) was destroyed much like a cd that wouldn't load photos on Travis's computer was? Jodi said she had her laptop with her, so why not show him off of hers, if that was the case. That is the hard drive Jodi spoke about her defense didn't enter it into evidence.
 
  • #665
AZL!!! I'm so glad you're here! Please tell us everything's ok, that Nurmi is playing out of bounds.

Uh, I feel sick. I hope this isn't true. If it's true and actually involves child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, the DP is off the table and even the conviction is in question. If it is not true, I hope KN has a damn good reason for thinking it was true before putting something like that about the victim in print.

I notice he didn't ask to file this one under seal. :mad:
 
  • #666
Well, the good news is that those dates are mighty suspicious indeed. The bad news is that they were recovered after attempts to delete files, if this story is to believed.

If LE did delete, then the obviously suspicious activity was never investigated to see when and how 1000's of files magically appeared on his HD.

The days listed are very few for thousands of visits to 🤬🤬🤬🤬 sites, the time stamps the sites were accessed will be important for JM to show whether or not someone could actually visit sites that often - more likely a 🤬🤬🤬🤬 trojan opening pop up windows or something similar, imo.
 
  • #667
BS conveniently released by the defense team's favorite schill, Kiefer, while the jury is on a defense orchestrated break from the trial. :gaah:

dingdingding Bob Fosse didn't do this much choreography.
 
  • #668
Well, the good news is that those dates are mighty suspicious indeed. The bad news is that they were recovered after attempts to delete files, if this story is to believed.

If LE did delete, then the obviously suspicious activity was never investigated to see when and how 1000's of files magically appeared on his HD.

That's the problem hope. Obviously there's a good chance Jodi is behind the actual 🤬🤬🤬🤬 we thought didn't exist on his computers.

But now the very saddening and pesky business that Flores or someone in the PD did something like this.

I think it's disingenuous to blame Juan for this or claim he was behind it, though. Juan is not an expert, he relies on his guys for this stuff and if the CA trial taught us anything it's that there can be computer forensics that the state is unaware of. They have no evidence of this.

For the first time, I'm actually scared. What if this helps Jodi to walk? And that's it, she gets to murder a man and get out because of a stupid mistake in the PD. I don't know anymore...

And so clever, Nurmi always finds a way to get out only what he wants out. Suspiciously, the very evening this is filed, Keifer has the article up, clearly written very quickly, and ready to print.
 
  • #669
Deleted via self-restraint.
 
  • #670
Uh, I feel sick. I hope this isn't true. If it's true and actually involves child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, the DP is off the table and even the conviction is in question. If it is not true, I hope KN has a damn good reason for thinking it was true before putting something like that about the victim in print.

I notice he didn't ask to file this one under seal. :mad:

Agree with EVERYTHING you just said.

It pisses me off he didn't request this to be filed under seal where he's "so concerned" about media and the jury being influenced. I hope like HELL this can be totally proven false for many reasons one being that I don't want Jodi to get the last word that Travis was a pedophile. Poor Travis is still being slaughtered even in death.
 
  • #671
Uh, I feel sick. I hope this isn't true. If it's true and actually involves child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, the DP is off the table and even the conviction is in question. If it is not true, I hope KN has a damn good reason for thinking it was true before putting something like that about the victim in print.

I notice he didn't ask to file this one under seal. :mad:

Ok.....dread just arrived. What a nightmare. It's possible that her conviction could be over turned????!!!
 
  • #672
Uh, I feel sick. I hope this isn't true. If it's true and actually involves child 🤬🤬🤬🤬, the DP is off the table and even the conviction is in question. If it is not true, I hope KN has a damn good reason for thinking it was true before putting something like that about the victim in print.

I notice he didn't ask to file this one under seal. :mad:
I know. I just about chocked on my spaghetti when I heard about this. Unfreakenbelieveable.

Question: If this is false, can Nurmi get in trouble for stalling courts time? Or anything else?
 
  • #673
Did anyone else watch the Michael Peterson trial in NC? This reminds me of the last minute blowpoke "find" (aka the fauxpoke) choreographed right at the last minute of the trial throwing off the prosecution. It's documented in the documentary The Staircase. It was a preposterous Hail Mary that failed. This smells just the same. I put absolutely nothing past this defense team which, in my opinion, includes Michael Kiefer as an investigator by proxy, being paid by the AZ Republic.
 
  • #674
Ok.....dread just arrived. What a nightmare. It's possible that her conviction could be over turned????!!!

Possible. The child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 theory did figure into her self defense speech.

I know. I just about chocked on my spaghetti when I heard about this. Unfreakenbelieveable.

Question: If this is false, can Nurmi get in trouble for stalling courts time? Or anything else?

If he knew it was false, he would be in trouble for more than that. But I just can't see him risking his license for JA.
 
  • #675
I just hope there is good evidence that PD did nothing of the sort and there is some other reason why this wasn't found sooner.
 
  • #676
That's the problem hope. Obviously there's a good chance Jodi is behind the actual 🤬🤬🤬🤬 we thought didn't exist on his computers.

But now the very saddening and pesky business that Flores or someone in the PD did something like this.

I think it's disingenuous to blame Juan for this or claim he was behind it, though. Juan is not an expert, he relies on his guys for this stuff and if the CA trial taught us anything it's that there can be computer forensics that the state is unaware of. They have no evidence of this.

For the first time, I'm actually scared. What if this helps Jodi to walk? And that's it, she gets to murder a man and get out because of a stupid mistake in the PD. I don't know anymore...

And so clever, Nurmi always finds a way to get out only what he wants out. Suspiciously, the very evening this is filed, Keifer has the article up, clearly written very quickly, and ready to print.

this wouldn't be the first time. Daryl Brewer "changed his mind" about testifying for Jodi in the penalty phase then Kiefer pulled the trigger on a tv interview where he interviewed Brewer in the shadows (Kiefer's voice but face not shown I mean). He's as dirty as they come posing as an objective journalist.
 
  • #677
  • #678
Possible. The child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 theory did figure into her self defense speech.



If he knew it was false, he would be in trouble for more than that. But I just can't see him risking his license for JA.

Will it be important to prove these sites were actually child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 sites? I noticed they were blocked out but a few of them are still readable and when I searched them the domain was not operable anymore (I couldn't read any of the ones the DT claims are clearly child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 sites though).
 
  • #679
That's the problem hope. Obviously there's a good chance Jodi is behind the actual 🤬🤬🤬🤬 we thought didn't exist on his computers.

But now the very saddening and pesky business that Flores or someone in the PD did something like this.

I think it's disingenuous to blame Juan for this or claim he was behind it, though. Juan is not an expert, he relies on his guys for this stuff and if the CA trial taught us anything it's that there can be computer forensics that the state is unaware of. They have no evidence of this.

For the first time, I'm actually scared. What if this helps Jodi to walk? And that's it, she gets to murder a man and get out because of a stupid mistake in the PD. I don't know anymore...

And so clever, Nurmi always finds a way to get out only what he wants out. Suspiciously, the very evening this is filed, Keifer has the article up, clearly written very quickly, and ready to print.

I can't bring myself to imagine the prospect of her walking.

Whatever happens next, I absolutely do NOT believe Travis Alexander was a pedophile or had the slightest bit of interest in children that way.

I KNOW she lied about catching him that day, because I've spent dozens of hours going over the timelines and testimony relating to her ugly story. If she had to lie, how can it be true? She hacked into his computer on countless occasions. It defies belief that she wouldn't have testified about seeing him with 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer.

OMG my heart breaks for his family tonight.
 
  • #680
this wouldn't be the first time. Daryl Brewer "changed his mind" about testifying for Jodi in the penalty phase then Kiefer pulled the trigger on a tv interview where he interviewed Brewer in the shadows (Kiefer's voice but face not shown I mean). He's as dirty as they come posing as an objective journalist.

I don't believe Kiefer can be considered a journalist at all ... It's a shame to which the depths he will go to discredit JM apparently even trying to help orchestrate getting a known killer to walk and be set free.

If she does walk due to this technicality I vote she should live with Nurmi or Kiefer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
2,477
Total visitors
2,614

Forum statistics

Threads
632,190
Messages
18,623,346
Members
243,052
Latest member
SL92
Back
Top