Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/11-14 ~weekend~

[memoriesbymichelle]

That was in October 2007. Jodi also took left over honey chicken to Travis. She said it would get soggy so she had to rush it right over. Just another stupid "reason" to go to Travis's.

In the I walked in and Travis was busy with the paper that falls in he chaotic way that paper does, it was a porcelain angel.

The stealth trip to Mesa where Jodi brought her second external drive, or in the same interview with Det. Flores she said three cd's of photos. In the external drive story she said Travis was looking a the photos and in the second the cd's wouln't load. That was the final time she access to Travis's computer.

besides after his death.

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

Well, isn't that dignified. And oddly enough, when I think of someone involved with this trial who brings up intimate details too often, I don't think of Det. Flores and I don't think of Jodi's pubic hair.

Oh Good God. Nurmi went down every slimy highway that he could. About the only thing he didn't do was accuse Travis of bestiality. Every day in just about every breath, he brought up those "intimate "details, way too many times.

and on my birthday Maria/aunt Sue tweeted " Over the Pacific" is serene. More from Jodi's photography portfolio coming soon.


And on June 4 2008 Travis tried to murder Jodi. He failed. Now his family seeks 2 carry out his murderous agenda--on your dollar.

At that site $2.7 mil for defense, huh? That means if #jodiarias gets DP, it will be one HUGE waste of money. A waste of money? No sometimes Justice takes a while to finally be served,


And when it comes it will be worth every last dime.

 

[memoriesbymichelle]

Jodi Arias doesn't want her new jury to know what she thinks of her lawyer, or about a former cellmate who claims Arias wants prosecutor Juan Martinez killed.

Two motions filed in Maricopa County Superior Court today ask Judge Sherry Stephens to stop the information from coming out in the upcoming sentencing-phase trial.

If the new jury hears about an October 22 handwritten motion Arias made for a change of counsel, both of her lawyers will have to withdraw from the case, one of the new motions states.


plus a pic of JA and her BFF Cha Cha


http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2014/02/jodi_arias_doesnt_want_jury_to.php#more

This article and comments are from Feb of this year

 

[Myvice]

W to JM

Jodi Arias doesn't want her new jury to know what she thinks of her lawyer, or about a former cellmate who claims Arias wants prosecutor Juan Martinez killed.

Two motions filed in Maricopa County Superior Court today ask Judge Sherry Stephens to stop the information from coming out in the upcoming sentencing-phase trial.

If the new jury hears about an October 22 handwritten motion Arias made for a change of counsel, both of her lawyers will have to withdraw from the case, one of the new motions states.


plus a pic of JA and her BFF Cha Cha


http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2014/02/jodi_arias_doesnt_want_jury_to.php#more

Oh my Gosh, I thought these were new motions!

It really seems like the DT are using JA type strategies in the mitigation phase.

In the prosecutorial misconduct motion, JW was able to pit MS against JM as if it were JM that filed the motion in the first place.

Nurmi has used the media to his advantage at every opportunity, while claiming the media isn't giving JA a fair trial.

And the way Nurmi insinuated JM was trying to find neked pics of JA "for whatever reason" was just sick. Now they're trying to make it look like the prosecution brought the sex into the trial? Just like Fonseka (sp) saying it's not about sex when she talked about nothing but.

It really seems that anyone that spends any time around JA becomes twisted and damaged. JMO

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Exactly what does Maria do?

:seeya:

I guess she is the Head Honcho Cougarlicious of the CMJA Fan Club !

:gaah: :gaah: :gaah:

Seriously ... what else does she do besides:

- Babysit CMJA while in court...
- Sit and giggle with BFF CMJA...
- Smuggle items in and out of the courtroom for CMJA...
- Whisper sweet nothings in MK's ear about the defense, court, etc...
- Twitter for CMJA with relentless bashing of the State and Juan...
- Blogger for CMJA...
- Art Dealer for CMJA's traced "artwork"...

Oh, there's a few more ... but I like it here ... so I better :silenced:

 

[janx]

interesting twitter from "JA" or whoever is tweeting for her

"Aww-Juan has a crush on Cougarluscious. Give it up, Chihuahua. You gotta be taller than 48 inches to ride that ride." and " I think his crush is becoming a distraction. He may need a little help staying focused. Quick, Flores, bring up Jodi's pubic hair again!"

There is also some new "art" by JA posted pics too including a self portrait with her specs.

Oh, how embarrassing if this person ever loses its anonymity. Could it go any lower?

 

[Ricki]

Still counting but here's her tweet from Dec. 6: "Has anyone realized TA's pc & viruses & State misconduct & tampering wouldn't have been discovered had #JodiArias not been pro per?"

The fact is, everyone does ​realize that and while you are congratulating yourself, brace for a December typhoon.

Thanks. That is encouraging.

 

[LinTX]

My comments in red:

I'm so glad you posted this. I've had to walk away for awhile to try to absorb this. BK's commentary made me very nervous and I was praying she just didn't understand.

In my mind I'm thinking BN has used his working copy to manipulate the data and even tried to erase the incinerator to hide the fact that he used it. How much more hinky could you get? But maybe that is just my mind trying to make this go away?
I have no idea if he tried to manipulate data for a reason or not, but the fact is that data was changed and therefore his work product means nothing. He may not have even been the person that used incinerator, but if he is the expert, why didn't he know and why didn't he do the work himself? But I will admit to being curious as to the reason they wanted to permanently delete files of any type on a working file. I'm not even sure he actually did a proper image copy, but if he did, why is it taking so long to make a copy of it?

I guess my question is, would BN be able to come to court and show, now, where this data is on the original copy? If he used his working copy to dig through the minutia and didn't add or delete anything I would think he should be able to prove it's on the original. They will have to use Dworkin's image copy to show what happened in 2009, but yes whatever is there and how it compares to the 2008 version should be easy enough to find. Again, I think it's the difference in definition of "", and no one cared about malware log files during the first trial. Doubt anyone on the jury will care in this phase either, if that's all they've got.

And when the state witness said there was on the computer, was he referring the things the virus put on there or things that were actually sought out? I think even Nurmi admitted toward the end of yesterday's testimony that it may just be from log files, with maybe one search or something. Neither would lead anyone that uses computers to see this as close to proof that TA had on his computer, much less tons of it.

Obviously, I just don't get it!

They were caught with their pants down when they were told Flores wasn't alone with the computer deleting files, and rather than admit defeat they're hoping to confuse JSS into accepting BN as an expert and allowing into the trial. But even better to delay having to produce witnesses that the public might hear.

 

[Kensie]

:seeya:

I guess she is the Head Honcho Cougarlicious of the CMJA Fan Club !

:gaah: :gaah: :gaah:

Seriously ... what else does she do besides:

- Babysit CMJA while in court...
- Sit and giggle with BFF CMJA...
- Smuggle items in and out of the courtroom for CMJA...
- Whisper sweet nothings in MK's ear about the defense, court, etc...
- Twitter for CMJA with relentless bashing of the State and Juan...
- Blogger for CMJA...
- Art Dealer for CMJA's traced "artwork"...

Oh, there's a few more ... but I like it here ... so I better :silenced:

Why is this stripper looking low class person getting paid?

I could do most of her job, put on tight clothes, over load of make up, giggle but I could not talk to the killer. Another waste of money and for what reason?

 

[janx]

:seeya:

I guess she is the Head Honcho Cougarlicious of the CMJA Fan Club !

:gaah: :gaah: :gaah:

Seriously ... what else does she do besides:

- Babysit CMJA while in court...
- Sit and giggle with BFF CMJA...
- Smuggle items in and out of the courtroom for CMJA...
- Whisper sweet nothings in MK's ear about the defense, court, etc...
- Twitter for CMJA with relentless bashing of the State and Juan...
- Blogger for CMJA...
- Art Dealer for CMJA's traced "artwork"...

Oh, there's a few more ... but I like it here ... so I better :silenced:

We don't absolutely know if the Coug posts those tweets, do we? Who is posting them?

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Why is this stripper looking low class person getting paid?

I could do most of her job, put on tight clothes, over load of make up, giggle but I could not talk to the killer. Another waste of money and for what reason?

:seeya:

In all the trials I have followed, I have seen anyone like her ... her attire is totally inappropriate for a courtroom !

I think someone posted how much she gets paid per hour -- but sorry, I don't remember the amount.

But hopefully someone reading this will know that info !

 

[dog.gone.cute]

We don't absolutely know if the Coug posts those tweets, do we? Who is posting them?

:seeya: Are you referring to Jodi's tweets -- not certain -- BUT it fits with the rest of the mit spec's M.O.

:waitasec: Maybe she delegates that particular tweeting job to someone else, which still makes the mitigation specialist a part of CMJA's tweeting.

 

[Dmacky]

That was in October 2007. Jodi also took left over honey chicken to Travis. She said it would get soggy so she had to rush it right over. Just another stupid "reason" to go to Travis's.

In the I walked in and Travis was busy with the paper that falls in he chaotic way that paper does, it was a porcelain angel.

The stealth trip to Mesa where Jodi brought her second external drive, or in the same interview with Det. Flores she said three cd's of photos. In the external drive story she said Travis was looking a the photos and in the second the cd's wouln't load. That was the final time she access to Travis's computer.

BBM ~
Wasn't it Travis's roommate that she so kindly took that honey chicken to? IIRC ~ she remembered that he liked it, and she just "happened" to be able to her grimy paws on some from work (I think?? )
That makes it even more awkward to show up unannounced at Travis's house to drop by food for his roommate.

Ps I could be wrong though ILTBP :smile:

 

[garthmax]

If she is doing it on her own dime, then she has lost her arm's length professional obligation, and that's never a good career enhancer. If she's billing Arizona, then she must be cooking the books. Challenged, I can see her using the lame excuse that Arias' so-called artistic talent is a mitigating factor, but she has already been caught with the pin wheel drawing that ended up for sale. The tweeting and media leaking has no bearing on mitigation. I can only assume she has nothing to work on mitigation wise. She is already suspected of retaining Bond the PI, and now we learn she tracked down the previous defence investigator. Neither of those qualify as mitigation IMO.

And that leads to question 4: How are the originals leaving the jail; who is placing the images on line; who is collecting the funds, and who is delivering the originals to the buyers?

Any how can she be selling an original oil for $7000?

 

[Myvice]

I'm hoping any of you computer smart techie people can explain something for me. (Since I don't even know how to screen shot or copy/paste tweets.)

By waking the computer in 2008, what would have actually changed? I mean, did it just update the software and delete viruses? I get that they would prefer to have things just as they were, but would it actually change important things if no one entered any commands?

When the state said there were no viruses would that mean there weren't any because the software had just gotten rid of them when it was turned on, or are the viruses still there but just inactivated?

TIA

 

[atthelake]

So MDLR has no problem being known as a "ride" on the Interwebz? I realize that someone like JA isn't going to attract the cream of support teams, but come on.

It occurs to me that this whole circus phase was launched by Nurmi 'n' them simply because JA is completely unable to impersonate a remorseful person.

I think is more like they want to have everybody talking about anything other than her killing travis and as it has been for months and months it seems. Most of our discussion here has been about things other than her killing Travis ..as have been media headlines .

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

 

[Nosey Parker]

Any how can she be selling an original oil for $7000?

Didn't know that!

 

[garthmax]

My comments in red:
They were caught with their pants down when they were told Flores wasn't alone with the computer deleting files, and rather than admit defeat they're hoping to confuse JSS into accepting BN as an expert and allowing into the trial. But even better to delay having to produce witnesses that the public might hear.

I wonder if Nurmi/Wilmott were aware that the first defense attorneys were present in the room with JM and EF on June 9. Did they think it was just JM and EF and decided to file the prosecution misconduct charge without investigating who all was present in the room. When did they find out about this det from Detroit? And he didn't remember much and the state probably paid for a plane ticket for his five minutes of fame.

 

[Nosey Parker]

I wonder if Nurmi/Wilmott were aware that the first defense attorneys were present in the room with JM and EF on June 9. Did they think it was just JM and EF and decided to file the prosecution misconduct charge without investigating who all was present in the room. When did they find out about this det from Detroit? And he didn't remember much and the state probably paid for a plane ticket for his five minutes of fame.

Didn't know that either LOL

 

[krkrjx]

Dr. Samuels said that JA told him there was child on the computer. LaViolette said JA told her TA had actual pictures. JA herself has said that TA had actual pictures (after testimony that no child was fond on the computer).

That's how I remember it. I do not recall the killer actually saying he was looking at child either on the comp or in photos, only that he had a photo of a little boy in Spidey underwear. Now, that doesn't sound pornographic to me and I do not recall her saying it was a pornographic photo. She certainly did imply that, though. I personally think TA could have been looking at the photo of himself dressed in Spideys and probably not even at the time she claims the photo fell to the floor in the chaotic way that paper does. She could have seen him looking at that photo at any time, I suppose. Or not, and she just made the whole scenario up. But really, I do not recall her ever saying there was child on TA's computer...though apparently she is saying it now.

I say to JSS, let's keep this thing moving along; the killer will appeal regardless of how many delay requests you grant now or special considerations you extend to her and her team, so let's just stop the nonsense and get down to the business at hand, which is getting this thing wrapped up and the killer sentenced for her crime.