Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/19-1/5 Break

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #341
IF she ever had a stun gun and IF she used at on murder day, it rests with the other weapons. In the desert, or tossed in at Hoover Dam, wherever she disposed of evidence.

I do not fall into the trap of believing something just because Jodi journaled about it. She could not speak without inserting a lie even to herself. But I will not completely discount that she had other weapons with her besides her knife and gun. She may not even have used all weapons that were available to her but I bet she disposed of all of them.

And then proceeded to procure some new ones.
Thing is- Jodi, like Casey Anthony intersperses bits of truth within her lies. Why else would she proactively journal about having a stun gun if she didn't think it could be used against her???

Also, and I'm too tired to multi-quote right now,( been busy working alot lately), but I really think those vertical white lines on the three shower photos are just too jaggy to be reflections from the flash. I really think it's more likely they are arcing from a stun gun. They are a very bright white.
 
  • #342
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/22/2014 8:00 AM

12/18/2014

TRIAL MINUTE ENTRY
DAY TWENTY-FIVE


LET THE RECORD REFLECT that Exhibits 233, 242.001, 242.002 and 798 were
temporarily released to Defense and returned today....

Dr. Robert Geffner, having previously been sworn, testifies further...

Defense offers Defense Exhibit 440 and it is admitted in evidence...
LET THE RECORD REFLECT that Exhibit 798 is temporarily released to Defense and
returned prior to reconvening....
Defense offers Defense Exhibit 796 and it is admitted in evidence...
Defense offers Defense Exhibit 439 and it is admitted in evidence.
Defense Exhibit 801 is marked for identification...

4:28 p.m. Court stands at recess until 1/5/15 at 9:30 a.m. in this division.

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/122014/m6626252.pdf
 
  • #343
I own a similar model, and it would be possible but difficult. Travis probably could have smacked the weapon out of her hand easily. JMO



Doesn't every mall have pedophile day? :waitasec:



That doesn't look like anything but printed scripture wrapped up. JMO
Never seen pedo pamphlets in my CVS!!! I think it looks like the drug side effects warnings they include with your prescriptions.
 
  • #344
When will we get to read the latest motions filed by the prosecution. I don't know to get them. They are dated the 22 dec. 2014.
 
  • #345
The BMW info is from BK site. It's really too bad that the Hughes won't be testifying. There's so much they could clear up and add.

I really think that Nurmi knew how damaging they could be, but also knew how judgemental they could be, and deliberately neutralized them before trial one.

According to the Hughes, he deliberately misled them at best, lied to them at worst, by saying the DT had proof TA was a pedophile. Nurmi was referring to the forged pedo letters.

The problem is, Sky believed him and said so in writing. JM can't call either one of them as a result. Its too damning that one of his closest friends believed him capable of such a vile thing. For whatever reason they used to explain thensekves after the fact.

Another CMJA revenge completed, to use his best friends against him after his death.

BBM. That's just it, even though the Hughes's were Travis's "close" friends, because of the damage they did when they called him an abusive sociopath in their e-mails to Travis because he wasn't marrying Jodi, their credibility is shot. There's no way Juan can use them now.
 
  • #346
Continuing anal sex with a man that you think has designs on young boys would really seem creepy don't you think? Nothing "normal" about that thought process IMO.



MOO

FTLOG ...never until this very moment even considered that the defense was trying to relate anal sex with a woman to pedophiles sex with a boy iykwim . Am I the last person to see that is what the defense is attempting ..or are they ? Again ...just considering defense trying to get one person on jury to think of this ... :gaah:

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2
 
  • #347
What exactly is the basis for #3? Tearless crying on the stand, but not while sitting at the defense table?

She's sorry she left the camera behind. Other than that, not so much.
 
  • #348
BBM. That's just it, even though the Hughes's were Travis's "close" friends, because of the damage they did when they called him an abusive sociopath in their e-mails to Travis because he wasn't marrying Jodi, their credibility is shot. There's no way Juan can use them now.

I still don't see why not. They hate KN and would be a nice counterpart to the obnoxious defense "expert" witnesses. The Hughes's actions paint Travis in a bad light and they would be more than happy to clean that up.
 
  • #349
...can't believe this case has been delayed till Jan 5!!
 
  • #350
FTLOG ...never until this very moment even considered that the defense was trying to relate anal sex with a woman to pedophiles sex with a boy iykwim . Am I the last person to see that is what the defense is attempting ..or are they ? Again ...just considering defense trying to get one person on jury to think of this ... :gaah:

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

No I don't think the defense is trying to make this connection at all. It just shows how ridiculous the connection is. She claimed he was a pedofile for young boys and continued to have anal sex with him to "cure" him. Really? GMAB.

MOO
 
  • #351
I still don't see why not. They hate KN and would be a nice counterpart to the obnoxious defense "expert" witnesses. The Hughes's actions paint Travis in a bad light and they would be more than happy to clean that up.

I don't think the Hughes email plays a big factor in mitigation so it's probably best to leave them out at this point. The defense can continue to do damage with their words. I do believe Sky testified in the main trial and they got a guilty verdict so that's good enough. Everyone who followed that trial knows it's all BS and that they were meddling friends who regret it now. Not sure the jury even remembers there was an email at this point, their minds are probably numb, so why bring in the Hughes to remind them?

Everything they have done to this point is for number 5 and 6 on her list and it all blends in together. The jury get the idea. It's whether they choose to believe it that counts I guess.

Her own "secret" testimony which was cut short was for number 4. Looks like Dr. G was given instructions to work on that one too.

So far they have presented evidence for numbers 4,5 & 6. Pretty much all lies though. So if the jury sees it that way they can throw that out.

Not sure about the "diagnosed as PTSD" one. I think Dr DeMarte will squash that one. The BPD? Yeah...so what? I think number 9 is a bust too.

The age? Means nothing. 27 is not a young girl.

No prior criminal history? That should never be a mitigating factor in a murder trial such as this. We all know she's done other criminal things, just not been caught. And for her first big one...it was a doozy.

Remorse? :floorlaugh:

MOO

2072lnn.png
 
  • #352
I think I hear a 'in' at the end of beat... as in "still beatin' me, brat?" She's pure evil.

I bet the defense expert witness Byran N could help. He's the one that enhanced the sexcellphonecall tape. And has he turned over that copy of the hard drive to Juan yet?

And the eyeball images...Juan said her saw a dog.
 
  • #353
There is a poster on twitter who keeps begging law inforcement to check a small lake near Williams, Az on Interstate 40
,the only body of water between Mesa and Las Vegas, other than Hoover damn
. I lived in Williams for many years and fished in this lake, Lake McLellen. It is 10 feet from the highway and has a road leading from I-40 a short way around to the back of the lake. I wish someone with a dive suit would check it out. JA never said what route she took out of Mesa, but this would have been the only interstate from Phoenix to Kingman. If you were trying not to be noticed, would you take a 2 lane (rt 93) or an Interstate?
 
  • #354
I don't think the Hughes email plays a big factor in mitigation so it's probably best to leave them out at this point. The defense can continue to do damage with their words. I do believe Sky testified in the main trial and they got a guilty verdict so that's good enough. Everyone who followed that trial knows it's all BS and that they were meddling friends who regret it now. Not sure the jury even remembers there was an email at this point, their minds are probably numb, so why bring in the Hughes to remind them?

Everything they have done to this point is for number 5 and 6 on her list and it all blends in together. The jury get the idea. It's whether they choose to believe it that counts I guess.

Her own "secret" testimony which was cut short was for number 4. Looks like Dr. G was given instructions to work on that one too.

So far they have presented evidence for numbers 4,5 & 6. Pretty much all lies though. So if the jury sees it that way they can throw that out.

Not sure about the "diagnosed as PTSD" one. I think Dr DeMarte will squash that one. The BPD? Yeah...so what? I think number 9 is a bust too.

The age? Means nothing. 27 is not a young girl.

No prior criminal history? That should never be a mitigating factor in a murder trial such as this. We all know she's done other criminal things, just not been caught. And for her first big one...it was a doozy.

Remorse? :floorlaugh:

MOO

2072lnn.png

#3 can be removed. This is the biggest one that is so untrue to me. She has shown 0 remorse, imo.
 
  • #355
No court today?
 
  • #356
  • #357
There is a poster on twitter who keeps begging law inforcement to check a small lake near Williams, Az on Interstate 40
,the only body of water between Mesa and Las Vegas, other than Hoover damn
. I lived in Williams for many years and fished in this lake, Lake McLellen. It is 10 feet from the highway and has a road leading from I-40 a short way around to the back of the lake. I wish someone with a dive suit would check it out. JA never said what route she took out of Mesa, but this would have been the only interstate from Phoenix to Kingman. If you were trying not to be noticed, would you take a 2 lane (rt 93) or an Interstate?
Good thought, but even if the murder weapons were recovered at this point, how would it help Juan? We've already gotten the murder conviction.

I've thought she either threw them in the Grand Canyon, Hoover Dam, buried them in the desert, or maybe even started a bonfire. She had plenty of time to dispose of them before she showed up at Ryan Burn's house. Could she even have tossed them in Lake Mead??
 
  • #358
So does BN come back? I am glad that last week JSS kept them later and shortened lunches. But, we need to get this "prosecutorial misconduct off the table. This jury is probably pretty much done, and, I suspect this can go into March.
 
  • #359
As per Jodi, she was in a fog and will admit to nothing.
 
  • #360
I'm especially looking forward to Dr. Demarte's testimony in this penalty phase. Her testimony will have to be geared to help the State get the DP. Juan's star witness is going to make a big impression on the jury...gargantuan!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
2,592
Total visitors
2,714

Forum statistics

Threads
632,199
Messages
18,623,493
Members
243,056
Latest member
Urfavplutonian
Back
Top