- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 10,864
- Reaction score
- 90,187
Not totally gone but damaged for sure, IMOVery significant. If the Murdaugh family had advantages in SC because of their wealth/power, those advantages may be gone.
Not totally gone but damaged for sure, IMOVery significant. If the Murdaugh family had advantages in SC because of their wealth/power, those advantages may be gone.
Respectfully snipped by me for focus.
IMO, this type of bleak assessment of one's life is a almost a clichéd prelude to a mid-life crisis and a desire to find new motivation. I would say this might be exacerbated when facing the mortality of parents and ongoing parenting issues that perhaps one hoped would have been mostly resolved by now.
AM seems to travel easily to Columbia, Charleston and Savannah. I don't think finding a paramour would be an insurmountable challenge (though I don't know if he did). The amount of money available is relative, and he had enough to impress someone if he so wished. IMHO.
Very significant. If the Murdaugh family had advantages in SC because of their wealth/power, those advantages may be gone.
I can't help but wonder if AM's father was helping keep him financially afloat. I suspect that AM was getting money to support his addiction from all resources. In the long run he was going to either end up in jail, dead of an overdose or rehabilitated - now he may be alive and facing two of the three.
I don't know that we have heard yet where he stole the money from. Was it from one of the firm's operating accounts, skimmed fees from clients, or was it from the trust account. The immediate suspension (with his consent) seems to tell me that it may well have been from the trust account. The bar/supreme court would want to immediately suspend him to protect clients.I think this a good and, as you stated telling observation.
From the article, this is the provision of law that led to the suspension of his license:
Upon receipt of sufficient evidence demonstrating that a lawyer poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public or to the administration of justice, the Supreme Court may place the lawyer on interim suspension...
As you stated, it is clear that the clan is no longer getting friendly reviews with pre determined out comes. AM maybe a substantial threat to bank accounts of the firm.
But, it seems to be a stretch to hold (based on available information) that he is a "substantial threat of serious harm to the public or to the administration of justice" give that it appears he embezzled company money, not client money and has not even been indicted yet.
I don't know that we have heard yet where he stole the money from. Was it from one of the firm's operating accounts, skimmed fees from clients, or was it from the trust account. The immediate suspension (with his consent) seems to tell me that it may well have been from the trust account. The bar/supreme court would want to immediately suspend him to protect clients.
I don't know that we have heard yet where he stole the money from. Was it from one of the firm's operating accounts, skimmed fees from clients, or was it from the trust account. The immediate suspension (with his consent) seems to tell me that it may well have been from the trust account. The bar/supreme court would want to immediately suspend him to protect clients.
i really hope he is on suicide watch.
"I was shocked, just as the rest of my PMPED family, to learn of my brother, Alex’s, drug addiction and stealing of money. I love my law firm family and also love Alex as my brother. While I will support him in his recovery, I do not support, condone, or excuse his conduct in stealing by manipulating his most trusted relationships. I will continue to pursue my client’s interests with the highest degree of honesty and integrity, as I always have."
Randolph Murdaugh issues statement on events involving Alex Murdaugh
I’m sick of every report in msm rehashing this family “dynasty” in the legal world as it gets redundant. But I do wonder if the fathers death prompted others in the firm to call out this money. It was probably dangerous to be critical of the big bosses son while he was still in charge.
"I was shocked, just as the rest of my PMPED family, to learn of my brother, Alex’s, drug addiction and stealing of money. I love my law firm family and also love Alex as my brother. While I will support him in his recovery, I do not support, condone, or excuse his conduct in stealing by manipulating his most trusted relationships. I will continue to pursue my client’s interests with the highest degree of honesty and integrity, as I always have."
Randolph Murdaugh issues statement on events involving Alex Murdaugh
I"m not sure I would trust this firm to differentiate between "firm" money and "client" money at this point.I think this a good and, as you stated telling observation.
From the article, this is the provision of law that led to the suspension of his license:
Upon receipt of sufficient evidence demonstrating that a lawyer poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public or to the administration of justice, the Supreme Court may place the lawyer on interim suspension...
As you stated, it is clear that the clan is no longer getting friendly reviews with pre determined out comes. AM maybe a substantial threat to bank accounts of the firm.
But, it seems to be a stretch to hold (based on available information) that he is a "substantial threat of serious harm to the public or to the administration of justice" give that it appears he embezzled company money, not client money and has not even been indicted yet.
Then again, maybe the rehab check in and the theft accusations tilted the balance? Even still, the very unfriendly review seems a little uhmm..... "focused".
And I am shocked, just shocked that no one in that law firm had any idea millions were being skimmed off, whether from diverted legal fees, client trust accounts, wherever.
IMO saying it was only from legal fees makes it an 'in house' theft, money only stolen from the other firm lawyers, but if it were client accounts that got robbed, it makes it much, much worse. I think we'll be finding out soonly just how much worse it was than initial statements from 'the firm'. Obviously SCSC thinks it looks mighty bad.
Moooo
Oh I do think it's bigger than from just the firms millions. Imagine the ones he was "representing" and how they are feeling. I am assuming there is a law firm in SC that would take on a suit against PMPED to try and recover losses their client experienced. Wonder how that would work, a law suit against them individually and collectively? This is crazy town!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.