I agree, but when everyone is lying the reasonable doubt goes to who?I believe that if we are playing this with a “lying scorecard” AW wins hands down.
I agree, but when everyone is lying the reasonable doubt goes to who?I believe that if we are playing this with a “lying scorecard” AW wins hands down.
Thank you! I am trying to find it now. So far all I see is a statement about confronting Alex, but he received a phone call.. then conversation turned to more of a friend to friend one. She assumed he would be leaving for the day, but later in the afternoon he called her on the office line saying he was going over things for the upcoming hearing on the boat case that was later that week.. he wanted info on his 401K balances. She was surprised because she thought he went home.
No time given for the conversation, but doesn't sound super early in the day and it doesn't sound like it was just before he left. I'll dig more tonight to see if an exact time he talked to Maggie or Paul is given. I'm just curious if he called them to come out before or after the call about his dad and the conversation about the money.
Daily Beast.So much behind a pay wall.
ZERO DARK THIRTY...except you must steal your weapons first to finish the Mission. Like putting a sidecar on this crazy train lol.That’s the funniest post all day!
“Im gonna get there, I’m gonna be invisible while I snag my preferred weapon and then I’m gonna kill them folks”
So you've been lurking ...again lol.I’ve only watched this case out of the corner of my eye, haven’t posted in here. But it looks quite clear to me that Murdaugh is guilty.
And I’m betting the jury will see it that way too.
A wise juror keeps his eyes on the ball. The full body of evidence.I agree, but when everyone is lying the reasonable doubt goes to who?
True if you are concerned about security…but not if you want to hide anything.
Here’s some tweets by the author of that article:Walterboro Cowboys gang members sentenced to prison for attempted murder, conspiracy
There are other news articles on this gang and possible ties to AM. Google will be your friend for these.
Not knowingly. At the time of the GJ, that information was deemed to be correct.The lead investigator knowingly lied to the grand jury about important evidence. I can’t believe any of the state’s evidence now. Sorry. Not guilty imo
Compared to what? Alex's 200+ lies??The lead investigator knowingly lied to the grand jury about important evidence. I can’t believe any of the state’s evidence now. Sorry. Not guilty imo
A wise juror keeps his eyes on the ball. The full body of evidence.
I’ve only watched this case out of the corner of my eye, haven’t posted in here. But it looks quite clear to me that Murdaugh is guilty.
And I’m betting the jury will see it that way too.
Ole hidden in plain sight ...can work if AM went to that much detail like leaving brass and shells laying around the area. Weapons powder from use on all the weapons, no wipe downs. Think AM may have took that into mind but focused on getting the ones used away and ghost knowing he had only so much time. Lazy and thinking AM status would keep him safe, no need for security and camera's. He sure wasn't no Doctor Evil, Mr. Evil had better planning.True if you are concerned about security…but not if you want to hide anything.
Compared to what? Alex's 200+ lies??
And then AM and Griffin shook hands.And everyone at the defense table had a smirk on their face while he ruled.......
Well said and it's true in the end, it's in the jury's hands and we're just reading the book as it plays out. Like many books we interpret them differently yet invest ourselves in the moment.Exactly. Crimes are complete events, evidence is never complete. It's a tapestry. Many juries will reveal, upon interview after trial, that they ultimate go with their strongest instincts (of which reason is one; most jurors also go for empiricism). But jurors do not expect every detail, partly because after sitting for a few weeks, they realize that's impossible and they cannot keep all of it in view, anyhow.
The goal here is to determine whether or not AM killed MM and PM on a certain night. Each juror probably has different standards of what's most important in making that determination.
It's a case that my co-workers and family members have been following with medium amounts of attention. They all think he's guilty.
We shall see what the actual jury thinks soon enough. I don't think they'll deliberate for days and days.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.