What does this mean, if I may ask, with respect, of course and just for my FYI:
Vine-borne projectile fruit? :floorlaugh:
I don't think he "subverted justice". He had a decision to make, and it was his to make, no matter what it was, and he made it. He picked life in prison and not the death penalty. 3 other jurors also made the same decision, but because they didn't come forward (and were smarter to keep their decision to themselves), they didn't receive the flack that Mr. Foreman did.
And I don't think he actually knew how to make his decision- certainly not
unwilling to make a decision. He made it in whatever way he knew how, much to my chagrin, and could not "compromise" and "fold" to the majority, from what he felt was right for him. I can only hope that, if I was on a jury, that I would not fold to the majority and would stick to what I felt was right in my mind and for me.
he led the jury to its hanging.- must be a very weak-minded jury to be able to do that.
(I can't even imagine how I am "defending" Mr. Foreman and his right to make his decision- he disturbed me very much months ago, but I try to put myself in others shoes- it's very hard to do sometimes. :scared
BTW- I respect your opinion and your feelings about Mr. Foreman. I do not try to sway people to my opinion because I think I'm correct: I just state my thoughts and I'm grateful for your thoughts on this subject. :seeya: