This isn't from England, so it's not George... but they are smoking from the same pipe. Just say no to drugs, kids.
"This case has drawn an astronomical number of vocal trolls that have consistently spread anti-Arias hate and venom. These trolls all claim to have watched the whole trial and know everything. What these trolls are clueless about are the hours of the trial that they have never seen! That was the numerous fights over evidence and admissibility in Judge Stephens’ chambers where the press, their cameras and public was excluded.
I hear the trolls say, 'But she stabbed him so many times!' What people don't realize is that few of these wounds were mortal. The human body is so amazing that it will continue to fight to survive.
Yes it is amazing, Travis fought to the death each and every stab wound was mortal. and the throat slashing is a given.
A somewhat frail woman realistically would have to stab a stronger male numerous tines (sic) before he would begin to weaken or expire. Superficial wounds inflicted by a weaker female would do little but invite more aggression from a stronger male."
http://www.crimefilenews.com/2014/09/expect-more-surprises-in-jodi-arias-case.html
Jodi was far from frail. She'd spent the last eighteen months hiking with Travis, she was in shape. And yes, Jodi stab Travis many times in a rage because she wasn't the one, and would never be
OK, first of all, "astronomical"? Really? And "troll"? I guess he doesn't understand what that means in this context.
"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet) Such as Jodi and family
Never mind. Hyperbole and the misuse of internet terminology are by far the least of this guy's sins. So is he saying that "death by a thousand cuts" wouldn't be murder because no individual cut was mortal? Or that if you (for example) behead someone after giving them the full Braveheart treatment, none of that other stuff counts? And speaking of Mel Gibson, what would this guy say about the death of Jesus Christ? I have neither seen the movie nor read the book, but wasn't the "mortal wound" a stab from a Roman sword? Does nothing leading up to that count? If that's the case, history seems to have made a pretty big deal over "nothing."
WHO ARE THESE IDIOTS? How many times were they dropped on their heads when they were babies?
• ..."trolls that have consistently spread anti-Arias hate... claim to have watched the whole trial and know everything... hours of the trial that they have never seen!"
The anti-Arias hate is consistent because she is consistently hateful. No big mystery there. What the "trolls" haven't seen does not matter. Nothing that may have gone on behind closed doors can even begin to balance the scales. Too many facts are known about the crime and about Jodi herself; what isn't known is irrelevant.
• "I hear the trolls say, 'But she stabbed him so many times!' What people don't realize is that few of these wounds were mortal." Easy, big fella. What
you don't realize is that only one of the stab wounds was fatal -- that being the stab to the heart. People and trolls alike are well aware that the other nearly-30 stab wounds were superficial. Ever wonder how she got the nickname "Stabby"? Yes, she did use the knife to slit his throat (another fatal wound), but that's not a "stab." Then we have the shot to the head (also not a stab wound), but I think that has to be considered "potentially fatal," since he was already dead when she shot him. OK, so out of the 30 wounds altogether (approx.) one was a fatal stab wound, one was a slit throat (fatal), and one was a shot to the head was (fatal had he not already been dead). So what? What could your point possibly be?
• "The human body is so amazing that it will continue to fight to survive." Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's exactly what Travis did. He might have actually survived had it not been for the three mortal wounds (see above).
• "A somewhat frail woman realistically would have to stab a stronger male numerous tines (sic) before he would begin to weaken or expire." Which, again, is exactly what happened. Does this guy remember whose side he claims to be on?
• "Superficial wounds inflicted by a weaker female would do little but invite more aggression from a stronger male." Maybe it's just me, but I'd expect superficial wounds from anybody would invite aggression from whomever they were wounding. I know I'd be pretty pissed off. Male/female, stronger/weaker is irrelevant. I'd expect an aggressive response, but that appears not to have been the case in this instance. Jodi may or may not have hurt one or more fingers, who the hell knows. (The only thing I'm prepared to say about any of Jodi's fingers is that she has full use of the middle ones.) Travis died trying to escape from Jodi, not attack her. The superficial wounds invited flight, not fight. The mortal wounds made flight impossible.
. Has anyone else ever experienced this? I told myself if i don't feel better in a year I'm taking the kids back home with or without my husband. I told him we could move out here to try it but that if i don't like it we are moving back and he agreed to this. Am I completely insane? He's a cop it's not like we moved here for some huge pay raise or a transfer or better work opportunity. It was a lateral employment move. I'm just so angry and i really don't feel in my heart that this move was a good idea. I did it for my kids and to keep the family together. Ugh i feel bad complaining but I need to vent
How much time does your DH spend around this older brother, zoey ? He sounds scary and very destructive and dangerous. Oh dear .... 
