Wow.
I really find it hard to criticize Judge Stephens because I don't have a clue as to what she's dealing with: Meetings in her chambers, slick manipulation by the defense and CMJA, side bars, the media circus from the first trial.............
All I can believe is she is doing the best she can do within the law, with the baloney this defendant and her "crew" are dishing out, and criticism coming from all sides.
I have NEVER seen a case where there were so many motions, so many attorneys, so many of everything. The closest I could compare it to is the Bryan Hulsey trial, also in Arizona.
What I DO see is a Judge who would rather err on the side of caution, then see a mistrial, or boatloads of appeals after the final sentence. And in the process, I think this trial will set precedence's in areas of future trials. Public and media access to trials for one. What quantifies as "threats' to a defendant or witness. Who knows, maybe even limitations to fees an attorney can charge the State, or contingency contracts if he goes from Public Defender to private attorney during a case?
We shall all see.............eventually............one of these years.............I hope.