SIDEBAR #42 - Arias/Alexander forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
:loveyou::loveyou: So good to see you here tonight, Y/N! You had us thinking you were snowed in and the Internet went Pftttt. Woowee, just glad to know it wasn't either of those. Hope your other trials today were more exciting than this one.

Skipped some posts to say hello, so back to the ones I missed now. ((((YESorNO))))

:yeahthat: Ditto! Glad to see you Y/N! :loveyou:
 
I forgot that today is Abraham Lincoln's birthday;

lincolns-birthday-cover.jpg

Link: http://bestcoverpix.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/lincolns-birthday-cover.jpg
--------

[video=youtube;9TCMHVmNc5w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TCMHVmNc5w[/video]

-----------------

Every Known Photograph of Abraham Lincoln

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YpV0-faTpM
 
I am watching HLN right now. The Hernandez trial is on live. It is a new show with Joey Jackson and called The Daily Share and will be on M-F from 3p 5p EST. Maybe it is not the live trial, I can't tell, but Joey breaks in and shows jurors visiting the crime scene. Really interesting.


Edited to add. . . .OK it is a review and discussion of court and testimony. HLN finally took the darn Forensic files off for this part of the day. Just like old times because I always enjoyed Joey Jackson, he was my most fave of all the lawyers who discuss cases.

Thank you for posting this. I haven't watched HLN in a very long time, but I am willing to watch for Joey Jackson! Love him! :loveyou:
 
Points to ponder from today. Juan never opens a door he doesn't know the answer to. Been re-reading BK's court writings for today and reading the "dark Side".

1. Juan cleared up the 9 year old that TA emailed. It was a business/PPL related deal. (NOT PEDO RELATED)
2. LD does NOT use Autopsy and he's ever come across any other AZ LE that uses it (questionable doubt on Pseudonym so you have 2 comp experts for the defense who can't agree on the use of Autopsy.)
3. June 19, 2009, LD does not agree with the 10:00 pm access and says it was around 4:00 pm (again, dueling "experts" on the defense side)
4. LD explains Spybot, inoculation, user has to manually add or remove Default blocked sites to have access or prevent access to them from the main list of Spybots's "default list".
5. LD worked on the Helio phone............texts on 5/2/08, 8 minute gap, texts seem to be 3 pages, last 2 with 2-3 minute gaps. LD has NOT studied the phone recently.
6. 5/2/08 message could have been copied and pasted, 128 characters are typical, message may have been broken up.
7. 6-10 possible 🤬🤬🤬🤬 images, compare to Pseudonym's 1000's of sites viewed, Adults vs possible minors, teens.
8. Studied "searches", found them to be "fairly innocuous". (Pseudonym said 1000's+ sex related searches)
9. Text at top of screen for Helio Texts says "Travis Alexander"

What I can get from this and the dark side's "Juan just blew his case"........

Juan knows why there's an 8 minute gap, why TA's name was on the Helio screen, why it was a rambling (and so not Travis "speak", I might add) to the point of being cut off mid word and continued on another text.

What was TA using on his phone as his "name"? Was the "text" coming from TA's FB or MS and NOT his phone? Were the texts routing through California, and not Phoenix to California hubs? (If you've ever done a "speed test" on your computer, the main hubs for specific providers are shown in your state or area. These are the hubs your computer uses to access the internet highway)
Did some one pull the message properties off the texts?

The "Dark Side" said Juan just bolstered up the DT's case today. I think he's set the stage for the "Big Reveal". He still has his rebuttal case, according to AZ Lawyer. (and Nurmi can try to get surrebuttal)


What do you think?
 
Niner~ "1st bold - at first I thought you were flying back and forth from Texas to Boston and back..."

ummm... I did too!! tehe
 
Points to ponder from today. Juan never opens a door he doesn't know the answer to. Been re-reading BK's court writings for today and reading the "dark Side".

1. Juan cleared up the 9 year old that TA emailed. It was a business/PPL related deal. (NOT PEDO RELATED)
2. LD does NOT use Autopsy and he's ever come across any other AZ LE that uses it (questionable doubt on Pseudonym so you have 2 comp experts for the defense who can't agree on the use of Autopsy.)
3. June 19, 2009, LD does not agree with the 10:00 pm access and says it was around 4:00 pm (again, dueling "experts" on the defense side)
4. LD explains Spybot, inoculation, user has to manually add or remove Default blocked sites to have access or prevent access to them from the main list of Spybots's "default list".
5. LD worked on the Helio phone............texts on 5/2/08, 8 minute gap, texts seem to be 3 pages, last 2 with 2-3 minute gaps. LD has NOT studied the phone recently.
6. 5/2/08 message could have been copied and pasted, 128 characters are typical, message may have been broken up.
7. 6-10 possible 🤬🤬🤬🤬 images, compare to Pseudonym's 1000's of sites viewed, Adults vs possible minors, teens.
8. Studied "searches", found them to be "fairly innocuous". (Pseudonym said 1000's+ sex related searches)
9. Text at top of screen for Helio Texts says "Travis Alexander"

What I can get from this and the dark side's "Juan just blew his case"........

Juan knows why there's an 8 minute gap, why TA's name was on the Helio screen, why it was a rambling (and so not Travis "speak", I might add) to the point of being cut off mid word and continued on another text.

What was TA using on his phone as his "name"? Was the "text" coming from TA's FB or MS and NOT his phone? Were the texts routing through California, and not Phoenix to California hubs? (If you've ever done a "speed test" on your computer, the main hubs for specific providers are shown in your state or area. These are the hubs your computer uses to access the internet highway)
Did some one pull the message properties off the texts?

The "Dark Side" said Juan just bolstered up the DT's case today. I think he's set the stage for the "Big Reveal". He still has his rebuttal case, according to AZ Lawyer. (and Nurmi can try to get surrebuttal)


What do you think?

I'm waiting with baited breath for JM's closing argument. I'm tired of this trial. I believe CMJA sent texts to herself from his phone on more than one occasion. I believe around the time when TA sent a text asking CMJA if she used his phone, she sent messages to herself and possibly other women using his phone and then deleted them thinking he wouldn't know what she did. His other texts seem to be short and to the point, the long rambling texts she received from him, were from herself. She may be intelligent by way of having a extensive vocabulary, but she is seriously lacking in common sense. She thinks no one has caught on to all that she has done, but it's obvious to anyone with a clue.
I also believe their entire relationship was played out in her mind, and he truly saw her as a friend with benefits after realizing she wasn't marriage material. I also believe that she acted like she was fine with being his friend, but then secretly obsessed about him until he caught on and realized what a loony toon she really is.
It's just so unfortunate and I'm sad that a great guy lost his life because CMJA is a psycho. I'm pissed off because she can't take responsibility for her actions and instead blames TA for it. I am furious that her entire DT does not have a conscience and have no qualms about destroying the reputation of an innocent victim. I will rejoice the day her sentencing is announced. Regardless of what it is, CMJA will be escorted to prison. Never to enjoy freedom and all the joys that come with it.
I know the family wants death, but I am starting to think that LWOP is the best option. If she gets Life, she will have to fund her own defense team (and good luck to her finding an attorney who will work for the whopping 30k she raised so far. Even if she finds one who will work pro bono, she will piss them off with her idiotic antics until they withdraw) The circus will just continue if she just gets death - at the expense of the taxpayers in AZ. Then HLN will do a story on how she is one of four women on death row in AZ. Then she will get more attention, and then a few more whackadoodles will jump on the jodi is innocent bandwagon and it will continue on clamoring down the street. She needs to go away, and everyone needs to forget about her - forever. jmho
 
What do you think?

i think juan is being vague, and it might not make a lot of sense to some people right now, and even look bad for him (i'm sure the dark side is jumping up and down). but i think he is doing this so that the defense team can't figure out either (like some of us) what he's doing and once everything is presented he will be free and clear to tie it all together. remember, the jury will have all this information with them once they convene for sentencing and something that might look weird today will be obvious once they have all the information in front of them. i think they are intelligent enough to make the puzzle peices fit in the right spots.

let the defense team go on with their 'experts' and feel confident that juan isn't doing the right thing, juan just doesn't want them to catch on to his big picture. llike we need more delays and sidebars and ideas for them to run with.

i really think in the end during deliberations when it's all laid out the jury will be smart enough to figure it out. i don't have a doubt.
 
Points to ponder from today. Juan never opens a door he doesn't know the answer to. Been re-reading BK's court writings for today and reading the "dark Side".

1. Juan cleared up the 9 year old that TA emailed. It was a business/PPL related deal. (NOT PEDO RELATED)
2. LD does NOT use Autopsy and he's ever come across any other AZ LE that uses it (questionable doubt on Pseudonym so you have 2 comp experts for the defense who can't agree on the use of Autopsy.)
3. June 19, 2009, LD does not agree with the 10:00 pm access and says it was around 4:00 pm (again, dueling "experts" on the defense side)
4. LD explains Spybot, inoculation, user has to manually add or remove Default blocked sites to have access or prevent access to them from the main list of Spybots's "default list".
5. LD worked on the Helio phone............texts on 5/2/08, 8 minute gap, texts seem to be 3 pages, last 2 with 2-3 minute gaps. LD has NOT studied the phone recently.
6. 5/2/08 message could have been copied and pasted, 128 characters are typical, message may have been broken up.
7. 6-10 possible 🤬🤬🤬🤬 images, compare to Pseudonym's 1000's of sites viewed, Adults vs possible minors, teens.
8. Studied "searches", found them to be "fairly innocuous". (Pseudonym said 1000's+ sex related searches)
9. Text at top of screen for Helio Texts says "Travis Alexander"

What I can get from this and the dark side's "Juan just blew his case"........

Juan knows why there's an 8 minute gap, why TA's name was on the Helio screen, why it was a rambling (and so not Travis "speak", I might add) to the point of being cut off mid word and continued on another text.

What was TA using on his phone as his "name"? Was the "text" coming from TA's FB or MS and NOT his phone? Were the texts routing through California, and not Phoenix to California hubs? (If you've ever done a "speed test" on your computer, the main hubs for specific providers are shown in your state or area. These are the hubs your computer uses to access the internet highway)
Did some one pull the message properties off the texts?

The "Dark Side" said Juan just bolstered up the DT's case today. I think he's set the stage for the "Big Reveal". He still has his rebuttal case, according to AZ Lawyer. (and Nurmi can try to get surrebuttal)


What do you think?

I haven't been able to keep up today, so have probably missed something... that said, I just don't understand why the information from the actual origination of the texts was not, or could not be disclosed. How could they not know ot have this information ? IOW, If it came from Travis' phone, could that not be tracked ? If it did not come from Travis' phone, could that not be credibly discerned ? This is just beyond me, I truly thought this was all traceable information. How, what, why ? So if anyone here can explain it to me I would be eternally grateful. TIA :wave:

I think I'll post this on the Trial thread as well, it looks like everyone's pretty much beddy bye here. LOL :)
 
If anyone watched Nancy Grace tonight, I missed the end and want to know who owned the house from her question last night. Anyone know?
 
images

Link: https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...Dy4zhzeZc6FG4CGqxEoOVkKWOWQhc1KanTE1_MMZ-JYtl
----------------

It's -6 degrees! :coldcase:- still no phone service.

old-man-winter.jpg

Link: http://www.funnymisfit.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/old-man-winter.jpg
-----------------------

Jodi Arias sentencing retrial: prosecution rests its case (short clip with more pics from yesterday's court)

http://www.fox10phoenix.com/story/2...sentencing-retrial-prosecution-rests-its-case
------------------

Uh-oh Sheriff Joe's in trouble: :scared:

Judge orders civil contempt hearing for Arizona lawman Arpaio

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/13/us-usa-arpaio-arizona-idUSKBN0LH03O20150213

TentCityPoster1.jpg

Link: http://www.jeepposse.net/images/TentCityPoster1.jpg
-----------------

Does missy:jail: think she's JSS with her glasses down her nose?

6697667_G.jpg

Link: http://ksaz.images.worldnow.com/images/6697667_G.jpg
-------------------

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ
I wanted to clear a few things up about the Jodi Arias schedule.
Court not in session till the 18th had nothing to do with juror's. It had everything to do with the defense witnesses. Nurmi stated in court his witnesses wouldn't be ready till the week of the 23rd and tried to get a delay. The judge stated she would call his experts and speak to them personally because the "trial needed to end." Today we hear from the judge that low and behold the defense witnesses will be available for the 18th as the judge had hoped. SO, this isn't the judges fault..not the jurors fault...it's getting these witnesses such as Geffner and Fonseca back in Az to testify. I'm glad Judge Stephens did whatever she did and our delay is short. Monday is a holiday and so really we are only losing one day.

Hope this helps :)
 
From the way Travis wrote in his diary, there is no way I believe the text was written by him! Which phone or computer it was sent from, I have no idea.

I am with Rhozwen about death vs LWOP. For the family, I hope the verdict is death, but I would prefer JA not have the option of free appeals. I would gladly take LWOP, as much as she deserves DP. I think she will have a harder time with LWOP .... but I also hate that she would gloat at the verdict thinking it a win.
 
OT.

Dmacky, do you know what is going on with the Erin Corwin case? Will there be a trial soon? I pray for that sweet girl every single day.

Thanks! :seeya:
OT
Good morning Rose :wave:
Unfortunately I don't know anything other than CL has another court date
below:
03/05/2015 8:30 AM DEPT. M2 PRELIMINARY HEARING - Minutes ACTIVE
03/04/2015 8:30 AM DEPT. M2 PRE-PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE

I'm thinking they may be getting close to a trial date since this is the first time that the media has requested to be there in court since he was arrested in August.

MEDIA REQUEST RECEIVED.
01/05/2015 JUDGE CORTEZ DENIES KCDZ FM MEDIA REQUEST

This case has really tugged at my heartstrings. I'm happy to see you will be there with me as well as Bernina and Kensie. I'm glad we have a member of Erin's family there, but it has to be really hard for her to hear some of the things that have been said about her loved one. Erin was only 19, and I remember how naïve and gullible I was at that age!


http://openaccess.sb-court.org/Open...mseq=0&dsn=&actionlist=HCSBWRV&relatedcases=Y
 
From the way Travis wrote in his diary, there is no way I believe the text was written by him! Which phone or computer it was sent from, I have no idea.

I am with Rhozwen about death vs LWOP. For the family, I hope the verdict is death, but I would prefer JA not have the option of free appeals. I would gladly take LWOP, as much as she deserves DP. I think she will have a harder time with LWOP .... but I also hate that she would gloat at the verdict thinking it a win.

I feel the same way Spell. The thing that bothers me so much is all the new crap JA has brought up, and she is still playing the victim. If she gets LWOP, all of this rehashing and trashing of Travis will have been for nothing. In hindsight, I think we all wish she would have just been sentenced in 2013. As time has gone on she's been able to get more crazy supporters, and more time to sell her tracings art. She needs to be in Perryville as soon as possible. I also feel that the verdict will be split again, and I just hate that she was given another chance for "the Jodi show." She is a manipulative LIAR and evil to the bone.

My heart aches for the Alexander family
 
Now doesn't that kind of parallel the vocabulary of the sex text? Maybe the mis-spellings are even the same?

Now that's rediculous :smile: Wait a minute :thinking: NAY it's not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
176
Guests online
724
Total visitors
900

Forum statistics

Threads
626,126
Messages
18,521,006
Members
240,940
Latest member
NTGUILTY
Back
Top