While we're waiting for the crickets to stop, I share with you my thoughts from reading the 500+ GOLO comments on yesterday's trial.
An overwhelming number of posters commented on the difference in Det. Dreamy's memory when being questioned by prosecution vs. defense. Most saw him as being intentionally uncooperative with Kurtz and just giddy answering prosecution questions. Since no crime ever happens in the TOWN of Cary, Dreamy has limited experience in high profile testimony, and perhaps with experience, will learn his credibility is questioned when he is combative and cagey with his answers.
In contrast to the WS community, the bulk of GOLO comments center around the amazing lack of evidence presented so far. By my estimation, there are 25 not proven for every one already convinced of guilt.
Many folks are distressed with the judicial handling.... anything the prosecution wants is just fine, Kurtz is frequently overruled.
And 95 to 5,this is a huge waste of taxpayer money. There are demands that the beef be shown.
Just passing the time while I listen to chirrup...chirrup...chirrup...rustle...<cleared throat>...chirrup....rustle.
Why is Brads pin or whatevers so important for this witness to know..Didnt the FBI have the phone and doing the examination of it??..So what if he was asked to obtain it...He wasnt going to be using it in his course of duties.. The more questions Kurtz ask..I keep getting the sense..all he wants to do is confuse things for the jury??..and make this witness appear unco-operative..Geesh..
BTW how long is estimated for this trial??..
So I guess I didn't miss anything?
We've been asked to leave GOLO at GOLO.
Which is just fine by me, since I came here to escape it!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.