Yes, fran, our boy Jason was quite clever. He, like his poor dead wife, also made lists. The butts could have been an impromptu "aha" IMO -- he saw a couple and said, "Why not." I'll bet during the testimony today, he is smiling inside and patting himself on the back. :maddening:
I recall during the Peterson trial, everyone thought the DA was doing a terrible job. As I got copies of the actual testimony, (there was a group who paid for it and it was members only), I saw the case in an entirely different way than most and definitely different than the MSMs. You would have thought we were watching different trials! I reached the 'HOOK' phase long before anyone else.
But, 1/2 way through the trial, the media realized that if you looked back over some of the evidence already presented, (it was a VERY long trial, MONTHS!), they suddenly realized, (LOL, 2 months after I'd posted it here on WS), that the timeline was actually cemented in to just 10 minutes for the crime to have occurred. No way!
Anyway, for MANY, it was the FINAL witness by the pros who put the MONTHS of pros testimony all in a fancy box, with a ribbon on top to boot! It was the lead investigator and when he gave his 40 something point list of why? they continued to look in the Bay for Laci, everyone went 'Whoa!'
Let's hope this DA has a 'Perry Mason' moment like that. They gather all the evidence, practically in black and white, with a title "HE did it!"
IF the last witness for the pros doesn't do it, the DA has one more chance to qualify every pros piece of evidence into the guy is guilty as heck!:behindbar
JMHO
fran