TX Suzanne Clark Simpson missing in San Antonio, last seen by friends at dinner - 6 October 2024 *Arrest* #2

I was curious if the bug repellant was reported as found in his truck or at the residence. It was reported as purchased along with the cement, trash bags, red bucket etc.
The bug repellant is never mentioned again. Did he spray her body with the bug repellant to avoid flies and insects, and if so why would he need the bug repellant if he put her body in water. Speculating he put her in a shallow grave covered with rocks. If he put her in a dry creek or dry river bed and covered her with rocks the cement was to make sure her body did not float or wash up in case of a flash flood rain. IMO it would be near impossible to put a corpse feet in a bucket and keep it stable until the cement set up. I would like to know the science behind bug spray versus cadaverine.
But, he could have tied the bucket with cement to her with the bungee cords/rope he had wrapped around her body wit the blue tarp? He could also have thought that the bug spray would hide the smell of her body if it was starting to stink (sorry, that sounds horrendous and disrespectful, but I don’t mean for it to be).
 
I was curious if the bug repellant was reported as found in his truck or at the residence. It was reported as purchased along with the cement, trash bags, red bucket etc.
The bug repellant is never mentioned again. Did he spray her body with the bug repellant to avoid flies and insects, and if so why would he need the bug repellant if he put her body in water. Speculating he put her in a shallow grave covered with rocks. If he put her in a dry creek or dry river bed and covered her with rocks the cement was to make sure her body did not float or wash up in case of a flash flood rain. IMO it would be near impossible to put a corpse feet in a bucket and keep it stable until the cement set up. I would like to know the science behind bug spray versus cadaverine.
I hope that someone is looking in the riverbeds! Especially like FindLisa said, it doesn’t seem like he veered far off from the highway routes.
 
I was curious if the bug repellant was reported as found in his truck or at the residence. It was reported as purchased along with the cement, trash bags, red bucket etc.
The bug repellant is never mentioned again. Did he spray her body with the bug repellant to avoid flies and insects, and if so why would he need the bug repellant if he put her body in water. Speculating he put her in a shallow grave covered with rocks. If he put her in a dry creek or dry river bed and covered her with rocks the cement was to make sure her body did not float or wash up in case of a flash flood rain. IMO it would be near impossible to put a corpse feet in a bucket and keep it stable until the cement set up. I would like to know the science behind bug spray versus cadaverine.
I was at my kid’s game at Olmos basin tonight and the mosquitos were nuts. My family has property within a half mile of both Simpson properties in Bandera, and on the river, mosquitos are always a problem. I think people are overthinking the bug spray being anything but for his own comfort.
 
I was at my kid’s game at Olmos basin tonight and the mosquitos were nuts. My family has property within a half mile of both Simpson properties in Bandera, and on the river, mosquitos are always a problem. I think people are overthinking the bug spray being anything but for his own comfort.
Which potentially leads us back to water disposal.
 
I was at my kid’s game at Olmos basin tonight and the mosquitos were nuts. My family has property within a half mile of both Simpson properties in Bandera, and on the river, mosquitos are always a problem. I think people are overthinking the bug spray being anything but for his own comfort.
Didn’t realize your area had so many mosquitos, bug repellant would be a necessity in that case. I was on the river walk a couple years ago about this time of year don’t recall any mosquitos, ugh they are unbearable insects.
 
Didn’t realize your area had so many mosquitos, bug repellant would be a necessity in that case. I was on the river walk a couple years ago about this time of year don’t recall any mosquitos, ugh they are unbearable insects.
Living in Bandera County for 23 years. Only get mosquito’s around standing water. Not moving water. Other than that, never been bothered too much unless we are in a very wet year with standing water in low areas. So hmmm about why he/she needed bug repellant? BS working in a standing water environment or preservation/oder cover for body?
 
Please check the paragraph #35 on P. 8 of the affidavit. It says there that 1 bag of Quikrete (out of the two he bought at Home Depot on 10/7 was found in his garage in the Simpson home in Olmos Park. In other words, he only used 1 bag, not 2. Basically, this means he either added more (maybe large local-to-the-site aggregate, or the square footage is very low because it was filling in a hole. Again, I've posted more detailed theories elsewhere on the Internet in last few days.
Honestly, we have no idea what he did with that one bag of cement.....zero, zip, nada.
 
If LE is no longer searching for her, then they must know something that we don’t… like, they believe that she IS in the landfill and that it’s like finding a needle in the haystack or they searched the wrong landfill.
 
Honestly, we have no idea what he did with that one bag of cement.....zero, zip, nada.
Well, it's concrete, not cement, so first let's get the terminology correct. Personally, I think he used it, somehow. That part is a straightforward deduction from info in the murder affidavit. He bought two bags of Quikrete in cash on Monday, 10/7, at the Home Depot in Boerne, according to that affidavit, and a bag of Quikrete was found in his garage in Olmos Park with a bunch of items that came from the bed of this truck, also in the murder affidavit. So, Det. Hector Ruiz of the OPPD made it as plain as he could that Brad Simpson seemed to use one bag of Quikrete (which is quickly-setting, concrete, not cement).

Yeah, exactly how he used that 1 bag is based on theory. When I refer to that, I'm just talking about one or more theories on how he may have done that, like that he added more local aggregate (like river stones), or filled the end of a horizontal void, like a culvert, or filled the top of vertical void, like a hole. These are all possibilities we should keep in mind. And, yes, technically, he could even buy two bags of concrete and then dump one in the trash (and not actually use it), but that sounds pretty unlikely to me. Instead, I think he used it in a purposeful way, related to the dispose of Suzanne's body, so likely one of the few ways I listed here. And maybe even other ways, like to make a simple anchor, but to be honestly, there wasn't time to allow an anchor to fully dry and harden, so that idea is less compelling to me. BTW, this is also related and coupled with his known cash purchase and apparent usage of two 1-gallon jugs of water, also noted in that affidavit. I think the police believe that too, and that's why they wrote that document up as they did.
 

11/19/24

Brad Simpson's brother, Barton Simpson, told the outlet that the home may go up for sale "possibly next year."

"The family will not be residing there, and we need to get it cleaned up so that it can be rented or sold," he said. "We are helping the children move in that direction."

Suzanne and Brad Simpson lived in the Olmos Park home with two of their children, ages 5 and 15.
 
Is it possible an accomplice had prepared a site for him so the process was quicker?
If erosion can be an accomplice, then I agree with your idea here. Regarding humans, had Brad told anyone, it seems Val would have been top of his list. But my guess is that he told no one, since he seemed to be doing all the critical steps alone and, often, with his phone disabled. I think stats for these types of crimes also suggest that he likely acted alone.

BTW, I've been looking how far Brad could have travelled away from the highways that it seemed he used to go back and forth from Boerne to Medina. Obviously, when his speed on the highways and with the disposal are high, then he has more time to travel away from one of these highways. Although he could go either north or south (away from the mostly-east-and-west highways), I think it's more likely that he would travel north to go to a disposal site, because his ranch was north of TX-16 and because most of the spots that look good for this near his ranch are north of TX-16.

All I want share in this post is that routes that go north a few miles from TX-16 (say to a more distant part of the Medina River, or even to small nearby lakes, which would have been mostly dry at this time) can't be ruled these out. BTW, these lake beds appear to be rocky in a similar way to the riverbeds, although the terrain of the lakes are smoother, so they don't offer as many hiding spots. Again, erosion could have been his accomplice, where all he needed to do was pick out a low spot, deep enough for the blue tarp (with the large bulky item still inside it), cover the tarp with rocks, prep the concrete at/near the truck, carry it over and pour it, hide the site by using more rocks or other debris, and take away any "spent tools", where the only "spent tool" not already back in the truck was possibly just the orange 5-gallon Home Depot bucket, now with concrete residue on it.
 
If erosion can be an accomplice, then I agree with your idea here. Regarding humans, had Brad told anyone, it seems Val would have been top of his list. But my guess is that he told no one, since he seemed to be doing all the critical steps alone and, often, with his phone disabled. I think stats for these types of crimes also suggest that he likely acted alone.

BTW, I've been looking how far Brad could have travelled away from the highways that it seemed he used to go back and forth from Boerne to Medina. Obviously, when his speed on the highways and with the disposal are high, then he has more time to travel away from one of these highways. Although he could go either north or south (away from the mostly-east-and-west highways), I think it's more likely that he would travel north to go to a disposal site, because his ranch was north of TX-16 and because most of the spots that look good for this near his ranch are north of TX-16.

All I want share in this post is that routes that go north a few miles from TX-16 (say to a more distant part of the Medina River, or even to small nearby lakes, which would have been mostly dry at this time) can't be ruled these out. BTW, these lake beds appear to be rocky in a similar way to the riverbeds, although the terrain of the lakes are smoother, so they don't offer as many hiding spots. Again, erosion could have been his accomplice, where all he needed to do was pick out a low spot, deep enough for the blue tarp (with the large bulky item still inside it), cover the tarp with rocks, prep the concrete at/near the truck, carry it over and pour it, hide the site by using more rocks or other debris, and take away any "spent tools", where the only "spent tool" not already back in the truck was possibly just the orange 5-gallon Home Depot bucket, now with concrete residue on it.
Your theory gets my vote. This is pragmatic given the terrain, the drought and the supplies he bought.
 
NOV 25, updated NOV 26, 2024
... even if prosecutors indicted Simpson, the December 9 hearing will still be held, just under a different legal mechanism called a writ of habeas corpus.

With an examining trial, the burden is on the prosecution to demonstrate that there is sufficient probable cause to move the charges forward, Hunter said. Though, unlike an examining trial, a writ allows for a defendant to immediately appeal whatever decision a judge makes to Texas’ Fourth Court of Appeals.

 
I think one possible spot is the bridge over i geronimo creek along 16 not far from the turn off to 37
Here it looks like you are referring to "San Geronimo Creek" (since that is along Texas highway 16 and not far from the turn off to 37). My personal feeling is that he predominantly stuck to Texas routes 46 and 16 (which goes into Medina as Broadway St). There isn't much time (or milage) to divert from that route (which he was already very familiar to him, as his main route from Boerne to his ranch). So, no, I don't think this diversion down to San Geronimo Creek (southeast of the 46 & 16 intersection) seems possible. I think his truck couldn't have been observed in all places for all time periods and specific times mentioned in the affidavit had he visited San Geronimo Creek (assuming that is what you meant).
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
466
Total visitors
547

Forum statistics

Threads
625,631
Messages
18,507,329
Members
240,827
Latest member
shaymac4413
Back
Top