A (step)father whose child has just been found dead allegedly being concerned about such trivial things - given the situation - as a messy house because "relatives would be arriving" should have raised a thousand red flags with policeman Anderson. But it didn't, and so he let Wilson clean up the crime scene. This reminds me of the Boulder cops allowing te victims' advocates to wipe off the fingerprint dust in the Ramsey home.
Interesting case, UKGuy. But it can't be quite compared to the Ramsey case because the wife was not involved in the cover-up.
Whereas in the JBR case, Patsy Ramsey was the main stager of the scene (fibers from her jacket were found in the garrote, and she most likely wrote the ransom note). So I always come back to the question: why on earth would Patsy have covered up for John if he both molested and killed her daughter? For this does not mesh with a scenario in which JonBenet threatened John to tell Mommy and he silenced her for good.
rashomon,
Of course its not intended as an exact comparison, but it does have some common features, e.g. a daughter is involved, staging is involved, and sexual assault.
Your question cuts both ways why should John risk a jail sentence, possibly even a death sentence if Patsy points the finger at him and accuses him of molesting and killing JonBenet?
Sadly the answer appears to be both that JonBenet was being sexually molested and that both parents were aware of this?
.