The ligatures were not stage props they were functional, they were used to pose the body. The reason there is 17" of cord from the loop around the neck to the handle is the handle had to clear the head as it was brought up behind the head and placed into a holder or one end of the stick was placed into a hole with the other end protruding out. This raised the torso to a vertical position, either seated, kneeling or on the feet. I don't think there was a free hanging suspension. The reason there was 15" of cord between the loops on the wrists is that cord was brought up over the head and placed over whatever held the handle or over the protruding end of the stick. This raised the arms to an upright postition, the same position they were found in in rigor. The 15" of cord between the wrist loops would not have restricted movement of the arms much at all and could not have fooled investigators as being a binding. The ligatures were not constructed to decieve police. They were functional as posing devices. This is a classic posing of a body after death for reasons known only to the perpetrator. The raising of arms has well known symbolism; surrender, praise, beseeching and others. Whatever it meant to Patsy can only guessed, mine is it had something to do with Victory!
This is my opinion.
The ligatures were not constructed to deceive police.
This is a classic posing of a body after death for reasons known only to the perpetrator.
The RN author wrote: posession. The first four letters are the word pose.
It's scary IMO how quickly he drew his conclusions, and how purposefully he ignored key pieces of evidence.
Location: 1508
Lou Smit was not beneath betrayal and was willing to suffer the consequences if it was behooving to him. He was dishonest even after he prayed about a business solution in 1966.
Wikipedia:
LOU SMIT
Having tried various businesses and failing, Smit prayed for a solution and saw as an answer from God a call he received from a cousin who served on the Colorado Springs Department suggesting that he apply to serve.[2] Smit fell just short of the department's minimum height of five feet and nine inches, but was able to join the force in 1966 after he had his cousin hit him over the skull with a nightstick, allowing him to meet the height minimum when he was remeasured the following day with the bump on his head.[3]
How do you know that the white blanket was specifically chosen?No, Anti-K, it is not made up.
Your intentional rudeness is uncalled for and not necessary.
The R home was filled with numerous blankets. However, the killer specifically selected the white blanket. It was discovered with one hair belonging to Patsy and a red fiber, again, pointing to Patsy.
Patsy's clothing also left a fiber in the knot at her child's neck. That's damning evidence.
Patsy's clothing also left multiple fibers on the tape placed across her daughter's mouth.
Ironically, one of Patsy's red fibers landed in the paint tote near the broken paintbrush.
She was hoping that by wearing the same sweater on the 26th, she could explain her fibers being on incriminating evidence.
I don't think she counted on John removing the duct tape and leaving it on the blanket in the basement.
AK, from what I recall, in the 4/1997 interviews, LE pins PR down in recognizing the favorite white blanket which was at one time on JBs bed, as being the blanket she was wrapped in within the WC.
In the 6/1998 interview with PR, LE firms up that the blanket was not on the bed that night, because the blanket normally would have been between the bedspread and top sheet which do not reflect that a blanket was removed from the bed.
As far as which dryer the blanket may have come from, after having been laundered, PR admits in DOI (page 274) that she laundered (and dried) the bedding in the basement laundry.
Thats as far as I can trace the blanket trail. Well have to assume from there that the blanket counts as bedding PR laundered in the basement.
That's hilarious!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Once again, where is the evidence that the white blanket was in, ort would have been in, the basement dryer and not the upstairs dryer?
...
AK
Lou Smit was not beneath betrayal and was willing to suffer the consequences if it was behooving to him. He was dishonest even after he prayed about a business solution in 1966.
Wikipedia:
LOU SMIT
Having tried various businesses and failing, Smit prayed for a solution and saw as an answer from God a call he received from a cousin who served on the Colorado Springs Department suggesting that he apply to serve.[2] Smit fell just short of the department's minimum height of five feet and nine inches, but was able to join the force in 1966 after he had his cousin hit him over the skull with a nightstick, allowing him to meet the height minimum when he was remeasured the following day with the bump on his head.[3]
AK, just to round out the quote you furnished, heres the one I used to figure that LE did not see that the blanket left on the bed was likely. Its worth a read to see how LE was framing the issue.
20 THOMAS HANEY: Okay. It doesn't
21 appear that if there had been a blanket under
22 that or anything, that anything was pulled out
23 from --
24 PATSY RAMSEY: Oh, I see what you
25 mean. Uh-hum.
1 PATSY RAMSEY: Uh-hum. Oh, you
2 mean -- you know how you make it, tuck it right
3 here, you know.
4 TRIP DeMUTH: Under the mattress?
5 PATSY RAMSEY: Yes, right, so it
6 doesn't pull out.
7 TRIP DeMUTH: So the blanket would
8 have been tucked all the way down to the foot of
9 the bed.
10 PATSY RAMSEY: Correct, under
11 this, under that.
12 TRIP DeMUTH: Then the bedspread
13 looks like it's properly and evenly distributed
14 at the foot of the bed?
15 PATSY RAMSEY: You're right.
16 TRIP DeMUTH: Do you see the
17 blanket in there at all?
18 PATSY RAMSEY: No. No.
19 TRIP DeMUTH: She didn't, the
20 blanket never worked itself out and laid loose
21 on top of the bed, did it?
22 PATSY RAMSEY: Well, sometimes.
23 TRIP DeMUTH: You know, completely
24 untucked, that's what I am asking. Do you know
25 how JonBenet slept, if that was a normal
0248
1 practice or was it tucked in?
2 PATSY RAMSEY: Well, something
3 that kind of heavy, you know, this was fairly
4 heavy. It was -- it would be unlikely that it
5 would be completely out, without being pulled
6 out.
7 TRIP DeMUTH: Without the bedspread
8 being disturbed also?
9 PATSY RAMSEY: Yeah, I would think.
While were not likely to agree here, I do understand why you challenge the conclusion about the blanket. It is rather confusing, because PR says one thing one time, and then confirms something else another. (MHO, itd be easier to solve Fermats Last Theorem than to follow all of PRs explanations.)
BBMThe "evidence" is in the statements made by BOTH Patsy and the housekeeper that it did not fit in the upstairs washer or dryer, which was described as a small "apartment-sized" set. Neither had a reason to lie about it- and frankly an intruder wouldn't have known the blanket was even IN a dryer, no matter which dryer it had been in.
That is a joke... isn't it?