canadiangirl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 2,829
- Reaction score
- 94
DP likes to take organized crime cases Hmm?
sent using tapatalk
sent using tapatalk
DP's self promotion about two cases shouldn't be taken as a prediction, he might even change his MO. I'm sure that the prosecution has him sized up and will be ready to counter his tactics.
I expect that he will be up against a strong prosecution team, this case has high public attention and expectation so the prosecution will be very motivated to succeed, investigation of LB's murder has now been extensive, and I expect that there will be testimony against DM about LB from one or more material witnesses.
DP/DM may plea bargain to reduce the overall sentence; I think he deserves 75 years without parole, but he may not get that.
DP likes to take organized crime cases Hmm?
sent using tapatalk
Defence lawyer Deepak Paradkar said he could hear the shots from the second floor.
"We're in shock. Everybody's in shock," he said from inside a courtroom.
Paradkar and others say the gunman "came in, shot an officer, and he was shot."
Maybe she made him breakfast
Accessory after the Fact
An accessory after the fact is someone who helps a criminal escape detention or capture. Helping someone escape capture includes providing food, clothing, or shelter to the offender.
http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j...=4uCw9qEAMl4yVETDn4y8HA&bvm=bv.65058239,d.aWc
He met Carrie Chisamore in Grade 9. He viewed her as his girlfriend. Chisamore was originally charged with first degree murder with Olah and Ruston. About a week before trial the Crown decided not to prosecute her for murder. Instead, she was charged with being an accessory after the fact. She pleaded guilty and was sentenced to one year in custody. She was a Crown witness at the trial of Ruston and Olah.
He won't get sentenced to 75 years Variant. He could get 25 years on each count, but will serve the sentences concurrently. Consecutive life sentences are not handed down in Canada, they are served concurrently. However, if convicted of 1st degree, he will do a mandatory 25 years without being eligible to apply for parole during those years. After 25 years, he can apply but still may not see the light of day.
This was changed with new legislation on Dec 2, 2011.
For offences committed prior to December 2, 2011 all life sentences and related parole ineligibility periods are served concurrently. In cases of multiple murder, where the offence occurred after December 2, 2011, a court may, after considering any jury recommendation, order consecutive parole ineligibility periods for each murder. There are also options for an indeterminate sentence.
Criminal sentencing in Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Accessory after the fact can mean many things. I thought about a case way back in the late 80s in Burlington when 2 young men (17 and 18 year old friends at the time) brutally murdered a gas station customer when he purchased gas where the younger man worked and was on duty at his job just prior to closing.
His young girlfriend was present during the murder, and then fled the scene along with the 2 murderers, using the murdered man's own vehicle wherein he was stuffed in the trunk, traveled to Toronto, and went shopping with the man's credit cards. I looked up that case, in which the two men were subsequently convicted of first degree murder, while the girlfriend was charged with accessory after the fact (interesting case, and if the men ended up spending their full 25 year sentence in prison, they would be getting out soon.
DP's self promotion about two cases shouldn't be taken as a prediction, he might even change his MO. I'm sure that the prosecution has him sized up and will be ready to counter his tactics.
I expect that he will be up against a strong prosecution team, this case has high public attention and expectation so the prosecution will be very motivated to succeed, investigation of LB's murder has now been extensive, and I expect that there will be testimony against DM about LB from one or more material witnesses.
DP/DM may plea bargain to reduce the overall sentence; I think he deserves 75 years without parole, but he may not get that.
Adding for reference, Olah and Ruston's case history.
http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/...rio/1997/04/23/r-v-olah-1997-3023-on-ca.shtml
Because Ruston was 17 at the time of the murder, his sentencing was reduced to 10 yrs. as per revisions in 1995. It also mentions Chisholm may have thought the man Mr. F was kidnapped while put in the trunk, still alive.
Isn't this the guy who sets up a "war room" to go over his approach to a case?
I think the WM murder trial will be worse than LB's as far as an advantage to the defense -
I can just hear DP (or any lawyer for DM) asking things like 'what do you mean it's suddenly a murder? TPS closed the file as a suicide? When/why did TPS suddenly want to check ballistics, bullet trajectory, GSR etc? A witch hunt?
It's DP's job to raise reasonable doubt - he'll have that imo. The Crown will have the mountain to climb imo (they normally do, I realize that).
No slam dunk anywhere, imo, on trying DM for the murder of LB or WM.
Wonder which one will happen first?