EHHH --Yeah, it seems pretty obvious to me that Survivor producers were sitting around one day prior to the April 13th abduction of Holly Bobo, and WHITNEY DUNCAN was just the OBVIOUS choice for the NEW season.....cause everyone knows Whitney, and she will pull in millions of viewers. Are you kidding me-- her visibility in the Bobo case had everything to do with getting on that show....and the fact that she was a beautiful young aspiring singer did not hurt either.
It is just one more question about the family dynamics that should not have to be brought into this investigation.....and I agree the promo seems off--but then her going on Survivor , for me, seems pretty dismissive of the severity of her cousins case. That's just me!:twocents:
I think my statement may have been misunderstood.
What I was trying to say, is that I don't understand how Holly's cousin being on a television show has anything at all to do with finding Holly. Or why it would be 'dismissive' of her cousin to be on a tv show. :waitasec:
If Holly had a cousin who was an oncologist, and who continued to treat cancer patients while Holly was missing- or a cousin who was a cosmetologist who continued to cut hair while Holly was missing- or a cousin who was a petsitter who continued to take care of other peoples' pets... would that make them 'dismissive' of Holly's situation??
And why on earth does it matter what Holly's cousin is doing??
And I feel the need to say again, that WS's is a victim friendly forum. Mod's- please correct me if I am mistaken- but imvho, this train of thought is completely useless in the search for Holly, and does not respect the victims' family.