TX - Active shooter at Allen Shopping Mall, multiple victims, 6 May 2023

  • #321
Agree, a lot of these cases could have been prevented if the people in perpetrator's circle would have said something. Not every case, but a lot of them.

If you SEE something, SAY SOMETHING. Parents, family members, friends, especially.

JMO

Then the next hurdle will the LE, FBI do SOMETHING?
 
  • #322
The news articles have said the shooter failed the mental health evaluation and that's why he was discharged.
Thsi may not be the case.

According to this article, he was discharged after 3 months of service under:

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5–17, "Other designated physical or mental conditions."

This implies a more "catch -all" reason than failing a mental examination given upon enlisting.

 
  • #323
What is his FB? I can’t find one that has only hateful posts, unless I got the wrong guy?
Not on FB. He was using obscure, unmoderated social media sites. Find Aric Toler on Twitter to see what's been uncovered. And, as he puts it, he was using social media as more of a diary/manifesto, not as a place to connect with people.
 
  • #324
Snipped for focus. In the majority of states (I believe 47 or 48, though that may have changed recently), you cannot have someone committed for evaluation unless they are at imminent danger of harming themselves or others. Even if they're psychotic. The law is clear about this. You're allowed to be psychotic, delusional, and angry. As long as you're not at imminent danger, you're not allowed to be taken somewhere against your will.

Source: I'm a physician and can commit people, for eval, admission, and for long-term treatment.
I'm a retired pharmacist that used to work at a facility that had a sizable psychiatric department. It's because of its misuse for things like people who were even suspected of being gay, or women who wanted to leave their wealthy abusive husbands, that it can't seem to be done now when it NEEDS to be done.
 
  • #325
<modsnip - quoted post was general gun control discussion>
He was removed from the US Army in 2008 over mental health issues.


To me, that is a HUGE red flag. Not sure why this information was not available to prevent him from getting a job involvig guns or prevent him from legally buying guns and ammo. JMO.

Well, because you don't know what the general mental health issue was. I think sometimes we see mental health issues in the MSM and it's sensationalized to give the impression the person was psychotic or something. There's no evidence of this. What if he simply had ADHD and couldn't do the job? Or OCD? Or what if he had depression that is now much better? IMO, if we say people with any type of mental health struggle should never be in a job that requires weapons, we'd lose a lot of law enforcement officers, FBI agents, security guards, etc. This population is human like the rest of us and IMO, they likely struggle with anxiety, depression, and PTSD just because of what they do.

There's also a thin line between preventing employment in these fields based on mental health issues and the ADA, IMO.
 
  • #326
Not on FB. He was using obscure, unmoderated social media sites. Find Aric Toler on Twitter to see what's been uncovered. And, as he puts it, he was using social media as more of a diary/manifesto, not as a place to connect with people.
Thank you!
 
  • #327
From your link:

Garcia had been living in some form of transient lodging, according to the law enforcement source. Law enforcement sources briefed on the investigation told ABC News that preliminary information developed in the probe indicates that the shooter was in the U.S. Army in 2008 and was "removed due to mental health concerns." In addition to the insignia on the shooter's equipment that suggested a right-wing extremist ideology, investigators have found social media accounts connected to the shooter that reveal hundreds of postings and images, including writings with racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist rhetoric, neo-Nazi material and material espousing the supremacy of the white race. None of the subject's postings analyzed to date were liked or shared by other users nor were there any public comments. The shooter's account did not contain any friends or associates that were publicly visible.

Okay so, in 2008 he would have been 18. Since he's 33 now, he's either hidden his mental health issues from everyone for the last 15 years, or more likely, everyone that knows him knows he has mental health issues.

Also, his social media accounts as reported, seem pretty weird. Hundreds of posts and images, yet NONE of them were liked or shared by anyone, and zero friends visible? I'm having a hard time with that one. Even the creepiest of creepy accounts has people liking and sharing their stuff. Yet this guy had zero likes, shares or comments?

Or maybe he had mental health issues in 2008 that have now resolved or are well controlled. We don't know. Radicalization and criminality is not mental illness. Until we know more, I don't think we can assume he was mentally ill at the time of the shootings or that it played a role.
 
  • #328
"... you compartmentalize it and put it aside. And then when it happens in your backyard, you realize, you know, the horror of it.”


The Dallas Stars canceled a watch party that had been planned during their road playoff game Sunday night in the plaza outside their home arena, which is less than 30 miles from the mall where eight people were killed Saturday.

DeBoer, in his first season as coach, said that his family shops there and that Stars players go there, as well.

“It’s really close to home obviously, and just tragic,” DeBoer said. “Frankly, when you hear victims as young as 5 years old, you just, you get tired of hearing it. I think when you hear Sandy Hook and Parkland and Nashville, you know, unless it’s in your backyard, you compartmentalize it and put it aside. And then when it happens in your backyard, you realize, you know, the horror of it.”

 
  • #329
Was DOD required to notify the FBI? What about this failed mental health eval disqualified this person from possessing a firearm?
No one who is mentally unstable should possess a firearm. That's why many states are passing Red Flag laws. But I also don't know if this shooter had his weapons legally.
Agree, a lot of these cases could have been prevented if the people in perpetrator's circle would have said something. Not every case, but a lot of them.

If you SEE something, SAY SOMETHING. Parents, family members, friends, especially.

JMO
Texas doesn't have a Red Flag law to help families prevent an unstable loved one from possessing firearms. But in this case, there is still so much we don't know about the shooter or his family history.
 
  • #330
AGREED!
Just setting him back into society when they could have held/involuntarily committed him, infuriates me. If he is too unstable to serve, how is he stable enough to legally own guns and work as a SECURITY OFFICER?! The system is horribly broken. The military needs to step up.
It isn't the military's job to monitor civilians.
 
  • #331
Even if found mentally unstable? a danger to others?
Good point.

But... a physician member stated that though as a doctor, she can order somebody into long term treatment, the person must be an "imminent danger". She then related that this is a high standard to meet.
 
  • #332
It isn't the military's job to monitor civilians.

BEFORE they released him NOT after. I wonder what he did to be dishonorably discharged!
 
  • #333
BEFORE they released him NOT after. I wonder what he did to be dishonorably discharged!
Was he dishonorably discharged.
 
  • #334
Snipped by me for focus.

Hang on, I'm confused. In the post you quoted, you bolded the following sentence:

"The leaders earnestly pushing "mental health" as a solution after every shooting will never consent to taking young men into custody before the mass murders just because they look or act weird."

And your reply is above. Are you saying that young men who act "weird" should be in custody to prevent mass shootings? I want to make sure I'm not misunderstanding because I agree with you regarding the Dickey Amendment, which is something physicians fought for years. But I don't think the answer is taking people into custody just because they're deemed to be strange. It's illegal (and should be, IMO).
No, I'm say the politicians who are pushing the mental health "solutions" are the same hypocrites who refuse to enact common sense Red Flag laws which allow family members or LE to seize weapons before the person can inflict violence upon themselves or others. They just seize the weapons, they don't seize the person.
 
  • #335
I think we need a lot more info before we can say the Army should have done something or committed him, etc.

My spouse is in the Army and spent time as a Drill Sergeant for bootcamp. He removed many people or initiated the process to "kick out" many people that were not adapting to the military lifestyle. Many kids show up thinking they want to serve and get a reality check that shows them in fact they don't want to do this anymore. All they have to say is they want to harm themselves and they go right to medical. That could be true or not, but it's a sure way to "get out" if that is what they want. After reading @Cryptic 's post I looked up the regulation and have copy/pasted it below.
Thsi may not be the case.

According to this article, he was discharged after 3 months of service under:

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5–17, "Other designated physical or mental conditions."

This implies a more "catch -all" reason than failing a mental examination given upon enlisting.


c. Chapter 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions). This Chapter is very similar to Chapter 5-13, except that it covers conditions that fail to rise to what the doctors call a “disorder.” These are conditions such as chronic airsickness or seasickness, dyslexia, sleepwalking, claustrophobia or “other disorders manifesting disturbances or perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldier’s ability to effectively perform military duties is significantly impaired.” The key factor is that the condition must significantly impair a Soldier’s ability to perform his/her assigned military tasks.
 
  • #336
Info on the social media posts, and his tattoos, which leave no room for doubt about his beliefs.

 
  • #337
Thsi may not be the case.

According to this article, he was discharged after 3 months of service under:

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5–17, "Other designated physical or mental conditions."

This implies a more "catch -all" reason than failing a mental examination given upon enlisting.

That's the official response. I believe this unnamed source:

According to an Army official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel issues, though, Garcia was kicked out of the Army due to mental health issues.

 
  • #338
Mauricio Garcia, 33, maintained a profile on the Russian social networking platform OK.RU, including posts referencing extremist online forums, such as 4chan, and content from white nationalists, including Nick Fuentes, an antisemitic white nationalist provocateur.

In the weeks before the attack, the shooter posted more than two dozen photos of the Allen Premium Outlets mall, where he was killed by an officer after the mass shooting Saturday, and surrounding areas, including several screenshots of Google location information, seemingly monitoring the mall at its busiest times.

Many of his posts referenced his mental health. In his final post, he lamented what his family might say and wrote that no psychologist would have been able to fix him.

In another post, he made disturbing comments about what makes a mass shooting "important" and praised a person who opened fire at a private Christian school in Nashville earlier this year, killing six people, including three children.

The shooter also posted a series of links to other sites, including a YouTube account that featured a video published the day of the shooting. In it he removes a "Scream" mask and says, "Not quite what you were expecting, huh?"
*I’m not up on the thread yet. Is it known what he had against the mall?
 
  • #339
  • #340

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
5,805
Total visitors
5,973

Forum statistics

Threads
633,359
Messages
18,640,636
Members
243,505
Latest member
imeiyou27
Back
Top