The chief said this is one of the most COMPLICATED cases he's seen in 32 years?...WHY? :moo:
I think it has to do with the unusualness of the family situation and the probable intensity of their online world, no confession, no clear pointers to any one possible perp and the very unique circumstances of how and where this baby was found. LE. Has a lot to sort through, I would imagine.
I think they know.....they are not telling, Imoo.
Hi Clu. I'm with Cherie. I think ME does know but isn't telling right now.
Earlier today there was a male reporter that said that the ME stated that she didn't die from gunshot, stabbing, or strangulation. He went on to say that the ME didn't know how she died.
My interpretation: The reporter called the ME office to get a statement or went by there...was not given the info on the COD and so he asked...was she shot? was she stabbed? was she strangled?...etc.
I do think that they know how she died but will wait until all the test results are back before they release the COD. Just my speculation and opinion though.
I believe they have a tentative COD.
But if they know how she died, why is the most complicated case ever, or whatever he said? Why say that anyway? It is not like they have to announce COD ever, before a trial. So they could just say they are not releasing it.
Strategy. Not announcing could lull the perp into a sense if safety that may cause them to reveal something.
First I wanted to thank you for this. I was trying to find a way of saying that without being completely disgusting. You did a much better job than I would have.
___________
I can think of two times when someone might stage an accidental death to make it look like a murder. One I already mentioned - if she accidentally died because of illegal drugs. Whether they were given to her by someone else, but not meant to kill her, or she found them and took them, it wouldn't be in the best interests of the owner of the drugs to just call 911. MOO
What keeps popping into my head (but doesn't usually stay there for long) is that she could have died at the home of someone who has serious problems with the lifestyle of her parents, and who believes she was neglected (whether she was or not). It could have been made to look like an abduction and sex crime to make it look like she died because of parental negligence which would serve three purposes. First it would get rid of any stigma/investigation of the person's own home/life. Second, it would possibly result in at least one of the parents serving jail time for neglect. Third it would probably get the other children removed from the home (if it had worked as planned.)
I'm not sure if I find either very plausible, even if possible. MOO
One thing I kind of am pretty sure of us that illegal, recreational drugs is not the issue in this case. I can only see drugs as COD if used to subdue her so sex abuse could take place.
This has probably been mentioned already regarding the vehicle, restraints, and where the body ended up on the road near the curb so I apologise if it has.
What if Alanna's body was on top of the vehicle, held down by restraints. Like this:
![]()
Then one of these restraints came loose and the body fell off the vehicle as it went round the corner. It kind of makes sense as to why LE took all types of restraints from the family home. Also could the picture of the "plastic thing" on page 3 actually have been one of the straps that came loose?
Here are a couple of types of restraints for loads on car roofs:
![]()
![]()
If the vehicle had a roof rack, tarpaulin and restraints then maybe LE should be looking for someone who goes camping, who holds their gear on the roof of their vehicle.
But can you really imagine someone strapping a dead body ontop of their car in broad daylight instead of stuffing it in the trunk or backseat or whatever?
Nobody staged a murder. They simply dumped a body. The cause of death wasn't even apparent.
Let's pretend for a minute that she was wandering around and saw the pool of the neighbor 3 doors down. She knocks but nobody comes to the door. She takes off her clothes and jumps in the pool in her underwear, and drowns. The neighbor comes home and finds her floating in the pool.
Hypothetically, that neighbor doesn't have homeowners insurance. He FREAKS out -- "I don't even know this kid! I'm not going to risk losing my home and everything I own because the meddling kid used my pool!" So he wraps her in a tarp, binding her legs for easier transport, drives her a mile away and dumps her, then quickly drives home and disposes of her clothes.
I think we need to consider this as a possibility! Seems entirely possible to me!
I just kind of think driving around with the dead body staged that way would be worse for the homeowner if caught than an accidental death. I think most people would feel that way. Also, see below.
But would he put a bag over her head?
Right.