TX - Austin Metcalf - 17 - fatally stabbed at track meet, 2 April 2025

I'm curious where this article got the info on what his GPA was.

Tuesday night, an advocacy group announced that Karmelo Anthony, the teen accused of fatally stabbing Frisco Memorial High School athlete Austin Metcalf during a track meet in early April, will get his diploma.

According to Next Generation Action Network, Anthony will not be allowed to participate in senior graduation activities. However, the organization said his 3.7 GPA and completion of all graduation requirements mean he can graduate without attending the final month and a half of the academic year.

 
I reserve the deepest sympathy for the victim and his family.

That said, this vulture is pretty much ensuring that a seventeen year old first time offender isn't going to get a fair trial, but a circus. There's no justice in that for anyone. And the only reason I can see for it is this individual is using this child as a platform for his own ego and, first and foremost, to make himself money.

MOO
“First time offender” and went straight to killing another human being.
In my world, “first time offender” means nothing.
Imo
 
Several items:

In the state I live in, if the incident (alleged crime) appears to be a felony, a grand jury must meet to return an indictment, “true bill” or state there’s not enough evidence to indict.

Granted, this is hind-site & old school & not knowing all the facts, but it seems like the prime time to understand/help KA would have been when he had the knife at school. I can’t help but think because he was a good student & athlete, he may have been given a break instead of help. Maybe the track incident wouldn’t have happened. Now he is being told he is an innocent party, who acted in self defense. It sounds like a bunch of mind games BY ADULTS to me. I don’t think this will end well for him either now or in the future.
Read Al Sarpton was going to stage a protest supporting Anthony but have not heard an update. Maybe Sharpton backed off?
 
Last edited:
Read Al Sarpton was going to stage a protest supporting Anthony but have not heard an update. Maybe Sharpton backed off?
:rolleyes: If that happens, he'd appear as an ever bigger a$$hole than the fake 'minister' mouthpiece already has and IS. It'd also be one of the most ridiculous and absurd acts by a 'reverend' that I've ever seen... it's already a ludicrous money grabbing circus! smh
jmo
 
Last edited:
I keep checking for some positive news for the Metcalf family or progress on this case, however, grateful for the (other side's) silence at the same time. Praying that AM's twin brother can find a way to celebrate his own graduation this summer. 💔👨‍🎓
 
To maintain student privacy, the school showed vid to MSM? Okay.
Frisco ISD track stabbing: District does not release video, but let us watch it. Here's what we saw.

reporters were allowed to view it, but not photograph or video it. It sounds as if not much is visible of the actual stabbing or what led up to it, just the chaos afterwards.
@tlcya Thx for link & your comment --- seems like stabbing is not visible.

Agreeing w comment & quoting from article, w bbm:

"Frisco ISD has granted restricted access to surveillance footage...
"The district did not provide a copy of the video but allowed reporters to view it, citing student privacy and school security..."

More, snipping from article, w bbm:
"...wide-angle video... a distant view of half the stadium... small fraction of the top left corner of the screen... difficult to determine how many people are present or what exactly is happening at the tent... Metcalf and Anthony are not identifiable in the video... sudden movement... at the tent, but the alleged act itself is not visible... a lot of moving, but heavily pixelated, figures..."

Was school trying to show that the vid had no evidentiary value?
To show whom? MSM, the general public, Frisco parents & students, other district's parents & students? IDK.

I wonder if vid may be enhanced sufficiently to be of evidentiary value at trial.


____________________________________________
 
Does not matter that they can't see what happened in the video.

One kid brings a knife to a track meet, the other does not.

IMHO, the law does not allow you to use lethal force on someone who just pushes you or even punches you.

The prosecution will show the one kid had some intent by (illegally) bringing a weapon to a track meet. He had it close by and therefore had at least thought of using it.

If it strictly from a legal standpoint, this one is pretty straightforward... murder or at least manslaughter.
 
Does not matter that they can't see what happened in the video.

One kid brings a knife to a track meet, the other does not.

IMHO, the law does not allow you to use lethal force on someone who just pushes you or even punches you.

The prosecution will show the one kid had some intent by (illegally) bringing a weapon to a track meet. He had it close by and therefore had at least thought of using it.

If it strictly from a legal standpoint, this one is pretty straightforward... murder or at least manslaughter.
I don't think anyone here disagrees. We don't need video proof of what happened. There were plenty of witnesses.

No reason to be carrying a weapon to HS sporting event except for bad ill intentioned ones. Period. He was there that day for one purpose and one purpose only. He sought out a confrontation and excuse to use the knife.
 
I don't think anyone here disagrees. We don't need video proof of what happened. There were plenty of witnesses.

No reason to be carrying a weapon to HS sporting event except for bad ill intentioned ones. Period. He was there that day for one purpose and one purpose only. He sought out a confrontation and excuse to use the knife.

In multiple interviews with people like this that happened to bring weapons to regular events, they always say they were thinking about the weapon all the time while they were there. Fixating on it. So it makes sense you would instantly drag it out if any conflict arises.
 
Does not matter that they can't see what happened in the video.

One kid brings a knife to a track meet, the other does not.

IMHO, the law does not allow you to use lethal force on someone who just pushes you or even punches you.

The prosecution will show the one kid had some intent by (illegally) bringing a weapon to a track meet. He had it close by and therefore had at least thought of using it.

If it strictly from a legal standpoint, this one is pretty straightforward... murder or at least manslaughter.
This was the video released by the school district. I am interested in the numerous videos taken by spectators at the track meet. That may show something completely different, and possibly even audio of the conflict as well.
 
This was the video released by the school district. I am interested in the numerous videos taken by spectators at the track meet. That may show something completely different, and possibly even audio of the conflict as well.

Unless the kid that was killed repeatedly punched the accused over and over (and his mug shot looks like he doesn't have a scratch on his body), this case seems pretty straightforward. The only question will be 1st degree or 2nd degree or manslaughter.

I'm thinking 2nd degree indictment from a grand jury.
 
Unless the kid that was killed repeatedly punched the accused over and over (and his mug shot looks like he doesn't have a scratch on his body), this case seems pretty straightforward. The only question will be 1st degree or 2nd degree or manslaughter.

I'm thinking 2nd degree indictment from a grand jury.

I would like to see more movement on this case, with hearings dates. I keep checking and have not seen anything.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
180
Guests online
544
Total visitors
724

Forum statistics

Threads
625,604
Messages
18,506,894
Members
240,821
Latest member
MMurphy
Back
Top