BryterLayter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2021
- Messages
- 87
- Reaction score
- 368
Yes but what is the Halliwell link to Sarah Everard? I’m totally confusedSarah grew up in York and her parents still live there
Yes but what is the Halliwell link to Sarah Everard? I’m totally confusedSarah grew up in York and her parents still live there
It seems most plausible to me that she left on the evening and took her stuff for work the next day with her. But, if she is as tidy as she is said to be, it doesn't make sense that she would leave for the night leaving a sink full of dishes. So, I feel like she may have had someone over for dinner (enough dishes and glasses for two if it isn't a reconstruction photo) and then maybe decided to leave for their place a bit spontaneously. Either way, it's odd that no-one is caught on CCTV entering or leaving.
Or were they guilty of something lesser than murder that would have sent them away for a stretch that they didn't want to do?I dont know its a real head scratcher. Just what do they have? because other than she she knew these people we have been given nothing to link them to events of the evening of the 18th or morning of the 19th.
The POI's are saying nothing. Even after the a CPS decided not to bring charges against them they said zilch not even a statement from a legal representative after the decision.
Whats the answer
Are they completely innocent. Did they conspire together to cause her harm OR Did they conspire together to help her get away?
just my opinions only
Or could it have been someone who looked like CH?
Did the 4 know who the real culprits were but out of fear did not wish to say?But why did the Police believe in 2014 that they had enough evidence against the 4 local York men in their 50’s to arrest them in March and April 2015.
The police must have some pretty strong evidence, what I’d give to be able to find out what it was!
I’m not buying the Halliwell connection.
Or could it have been someone who looked like CH?
I believe that the sighting on Melrosegate bridge was confirmed as a left handed smoker but I have seen a posting somewhere on one of these threads that included a statement from Cold case saying that they couldn't ascertain if the butt in the car was left or right handed smoker and the DNA to date has been untraceable.I've always been undecided about whether she left for work or something happened in her home but your theory actually makes the most sense to me. It really does look like she had someone over and it's likely they then left together, so the "crime scene" could be the other person's house or car! It doesn't necessarily mean more than one person was involved in the act itself (a lot of you guys seem to think at least two people were responsible?) but it's very possible they told someone and/or asked for help in moving the body?
Also this thing about the "left handed smoker". I'd read Claudia's car was in the garage for repairs but police checked it and found a cigarette butt that looked like it had been used by a left handed smoker. Is this 100% confirmed? (curious how they'd even be able to tell this as well!) It's an interesting aspect when you consider the witness sighting. CL didn't smoke and apparently hated people smoking around her.
You don't need strong evidence to arrest someone, just reasonable suspicion. The CPS assess any file passed to them by the police and will only proceed if there is a reasonable chance of a successful prosecution. I suspect, that the police had circumstantial evidence only against these men and it just didn't reach the necessary standard.The Police prepared a file for CPS, there must have been pretty strong evidence for them to arrest these men, even if it didn’t progress to court?
No. Nada. Crickets. Am starting to think there is some kind of news blackout........Sorry, I've been away for a few days caught up with family matters - could someone please summarise what, if anything, has been revealed since this latest event started? Have the police announced anything?
There’s a problem with that thinking. Claudia was single, she had her own house, no lodgers and work in the morning - why would she need or want to go elsewhere - you are also digesting she left unseen - by the back alley perhaps. She doesn’t need to skulk about - she’s single. Left yo elsewhere is a possibility of course, however - the sink - points to a visitor, a couple of drinks and something to eat - maybe supper, maybe breakfast. What I am thinking is - if you are one of the perps - I’d be looking at one another - someone’s got a loose tongue and the cops are on to you - IMO (of course )It seems most plausible to me that she left on the evening and took her stuff for work the next day with her. But, if she is as tidy as she is said to be, it doesn't make sense that she would leave for the night leaving a sink full of dishes. So, I feel like she may have had someone over for dinner (enough dishes and glasses for two if it isn't a reconstruction photo) and then maybe decided to leave for their place a bit spontaneously. Either way, it's odd that no-one is caught on CCTV entering or leaving.
ing to the conclusion of male and female given the time of day?I have been giving some thought on the night of the 18th vs the morning of the 19th.
I'm leaning more towards hte morning of the 19th, mostly because there is lack of evidence of anything untoward (that we know of) in Claudia's home.
HOWEVER.
If it was the 18th, I think the suspect would be more likely to be female, with help from a male to cover up.
If it was the 19th, I think the suspect would be more likely to be male.
RSBM - on various CCTV images of her walking home from work on 18th she has her rucksack slung over her left shoulder --> https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0057/2240/7021/files/Claudia6_2048x2048.jpg?v=1570196688We think CL is right handed
I believe that the sighting on Melrosegate bridge was confirmed as a left handed smoker but I have seen a posting somewhere on one of these threads that included a statement from Cold case saying that they couldn't ascertain if the butt in the car was left or right handed smoker and the DNA to date has been untraceable.
Ah, I need to read responses properlyHow are you vom
ing to the conclusion of male and female given the time of day?
i agree with you about the rucksack - though I do alternate if it’s something heavy
There’s a problem with that thinking. Claudia was single, she had her own house, no lodgers and work in the morning - why would she need or want to go elsewhere - you are also digesting she left unseen - by the back alley perhaps. She doesn’t need to skulk about - she’s single. Left yo elsewhere is a possibility of course, however - the sink - points to a visitor, a couple of drinks and something to eat - maybe supper, maybe breakfast. What I am thinking is - if you are one of the perps - I’d be looking at one another - someone’s got a loose tongue and the cops are on to you - IMO (of course )