UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #17

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #761
Yes but it seems NYP ignore these tips perhaps because the investigation is ‘top heavy ‘
You need to report your info again
 
  • #762
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #763
  • #764
You need to report your info again
Unfortunately the police don't even listen to direct information nevermind crimestoppers info
 
  • #765
It says she had a computer...
but in this one it says she didn't - so who knows?
' At first it was thought she might have met men on the internet, although she doesn’t own a computer'.

Also on the NY site - https://www.northyorkshire.police.u...searches-at-sand-hutton-gravel-pits-conclude/

'Claudia did not have a computer, did not access the internet via her phone and did not have a social media presence.''

It's a shame that they have taken the microsite down and replaced with just one page of information.
 
Last edited:
  • #766
Claudia may have popped into a shop or travel agency on her way home before she was abducted and escorted out of the rear exit...
 
  • #767
but in this one it says she didn't - so who knows?
' At first it was thought she might have met men on the internet, although she doesn’t own a computer'.

Also on the NY site - https://www.northyorkshire.police.u...searches-at-sand-hutton-gravel-pits-conclude/

'Claudia did not have a computer, did not access the internet via her phone and did not have a social media presence.''

It's a shame that they have taken the microsite down and replaced with just one page of information.
How could any but Claudia know she didn’t access the internet with her phone? Microsite - more holes than a teabag springs to mind
 
  • #768
Did anyone check Claudia's email address at the Uni?
 
  • #769
Claudia may have popped into a shop or travel agency on her way home before she was abducted and escorted out of the rear exit...
It is a possibility - though then you have to fit all the other evidence around that theory - her phone calls and communications much later, the activity outside her house at 9.01pm on the 18th, alleywayman, the breaking focus etc etc
 
  • #770
  • #771
  • #772
  • #773
MOD NOTE:

Thread is closed for cleanup.
 
  • #774
MOD NOTE:

Let's try this again.

If you are a member of Websleuths, you AGREED to follow the Terms of Service when you joined.

MANY posts have been removed for violating our TOS. Nobody posting in this thread right now is a brand new member who hasn't had time to acclimate themselves to the expectations that Tricia has for all of us, and that is described in the TOS. Please review the rules linked in my signature.

Websleuths is intentionally strict about being fact-based and victim-friendly. LINKS are required. It doesn't matter that the case is old and you think everybody knows all the information already. Time has gone by, new information has come up and been verified or been discarded, and facts have been forgotten. You may think you remember something; you may be wrong. You may think "everybody knows," but everybody may not know. You are required to post a link verifying any statement that you post as a fact of the case.

If you think someone is posting in bad faith, don't make insinuations and snide remarks on the thread, report it. You can do that by clicking the report button under the post.

Posts are removed for violating TOS. Responding to posts that violate TOS is also a TOS violation, so those posts are removed as well. Commenting on moderation at all on the thread is a violation of TOS. If you have questions about posts being removed, you can hit report on any post and ask your question there.

Please report posts that violate TOS so that any cleanup is a post or two, rather than a page or two.

Stop with the bickering. It's not that hard to be polite. We're all grownups here. You don't have to agree with another member's opinions, but you don't have to act like it's a big holiday dinner at your rude aunt's house, either. If you just can't be nice, maybe you are the rude aunt.


Please like this post so that I know that you have read it. The thread will reopen shortly.
 
  • #775
Thread is open. Please post responsibly.
 
  • #776
thanks very much k n I t t y and sorry for causing you so much work.
Im going to have to withdraw from this thread, because I have nothing more to say and I think its too complex a case to be dealt with here..all the theories are out there and if the police can't prove anything with what they've got, that's it...normally a lot of people being involved means someone will give something away...but I. think the opposite is true here..too many people left to take revenge.
I think there was another factor at play other than Claudias love life, but if I say what it is, ill give the mods more work.and.i think..her murder was planned...I don't know if the person who planned it was the person who killed her but I think pope John is right when he says we've probably never heard of the person who planned it...I think this other person either drew or. forced other people in...I think there were essentially 2 groups...a group within a group....I think Claudia was out of control when drunk and had. said or done something to make her a great danger

thanks for your patience with my typing and take care pope John...I know what its like. to be an innocent witness
 
  • #777
Alleyman - did the same manoeuvre twice. Which you have to account for. Plus he had a very short time - a matter of seconds off camera.
As we seen in the CCTV footage, when alley-man stopped on the corner. A black vehicle drives past,as white jacket man passes by. Alley man waits, screen freezes for a zoom in and he continues to proceed. Heading in the direction of claudias. But as alley man approaches Heworth road, from Heworth place That same black looking vehicle passes again. If indeed it is the same vehicle, then how much time had really actually passed by. How long would it take, to go full circle passing back in the same direction. As strange as both males (alley man/White Jacket man) caught in the short time frame on both evening and morning footage. My point is,any length of time we are lead to believe. May be much longer than we are told .It has been a while since I have watched the cctv footage. Did all CCTV footage have time running throughout what was shown?
 
  • #778
If this is the best photo of Claudia walking home from work (The last cctv of her) where her father says "That LOOKS like Claudia).
Did she walk home that afternoon or was this someone else in photo?-See article.
Source:
The cctv, although darker at 5.30 am inside the uni of claudia. She looks much darker hair, and a more of a shapely figure. Just my opinion. Plus , did the woman with shorter blonde hair have two bags in the footage?
 
  • #779
Claudia may have popped into a shop or travel agency on her way home before she was abducted and escorted out of the rear exit...
JK and Claudia had booked their holiday, starting a week later.Easter break! RC said she had planned to stay with him, and visited him many times. SS said he had grossly exaggerated the amount of trips previously,and if visiting, would stay with him.Two very different accounts, from two friends on the island.
 
  • #780
JK was living in burnholme in 2007,with a friend.Was she living with Claudia prior Heworth road. JK also stated she met up with Claudia to discuss a problem she had. Alexandria,Claudias sister confirmed this as Claudia told her the same upon cancelling a planned visit. So was that Tuesday or Wednesday! It must have been a serious matter to cancel her sister, yet again. Apart from work colleagues on Wednesday, was JK the last friend to see Claudia in person. I wonder If Claudia helped JK with her problem on the Wednesday evening x
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
76
Guests online
1,720
Total visitors
1,796

Forum statistics

Threads
632,540
Messages
18,628,138
Members
243,190
Latest member
Lamoorh
Back
Top