UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #18

Status
Not open for further replies.
A question out of curiosity
On the morning of the 19th where the guy gets on the bus, does that bus go anywhere near the university because if the 5.07am alleyman footage is timed correctly theres a good chance thats him?
I read a different time for alleyman morning cctv so thought it would've been impossible to have been him.
 
A question out of curiosity
On the morning of the 19th where the guy gets on the bus, does that bus go anywhere near the university because if the 5.07am alleyman footage is timed correctly theres a good chance thats him?
I read a different time for alleyman morning cctv so thought it would've been impossible to have been him.
That man on the bus was identified after all it was a very clear picture of him the whole purpose of a bus cctv
 
Someone on here already asked cold case and they were told Claudia wasn't sighted on any cctv at all on the 19th of March

UK - UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #11
I’m with you on this 100% it’s perplexing because how did someone get her out without anyone seeing? If she was taken out the back then it was hardly slick, all the commotion at the front and then numerous people circling the property into the early hours of the morning. Back in my early days of looking at it, before I looked at the arrested 4 I went over the calls/ texts looking at the conversations with her dad/her mum and her friend - there seemed to be an apprehension about walking to work - her dad offered his car, her mum a taxi and her friend said she shouldn’t be walking to work at that time in the morning. Her mum could hear the tv and their fav program on - so this indicated she was at home. I’ve always thought she was at home however then you have to deal with the unfathomable - where did she disappear to. If she went to the nags - again she isn’t seen at the front - yes she could have gone up the metal stairs at the back but why would she. I know there’s uncertainty about her going back home after she went out again after arriving back from work. Could she have gone visiting someone near the parade and then sent someone to get her rucksack whilst ringing mum and dad?
 
A question out of curiosity
On the morning of the 19th where the guy gets on the bus, does that bus go anywhere near the university because if the 5.07am alleyman footage is timed correctly theres a good chance thats him?
I read a different time for alleyman morning cctv so thought it would've been impossible to have been him.
Are you talking about the man who gets on the bus to Leeds?
 
I’m with you on this 100% it’s perplexing because how did someone get her out without anyone seeing? If she was taken out the back then it was hardly slick, all the commotion at the front and then numerous people circling the property into the early hours of the morning. Back in my early days of looking at it, before I looked at the arrested 4 I went over the calls/ texts looking at the conversations with her dad/her mum and her friend - there seemed to be an apprehension about walking to work - her dad offered his car, her mum a taxi and her friend said she shouldn’t be walking to work at that time in the morning. Her mum could hear the tv and their fav program on - so this indicated she was at home. I’ve always thought she was at home however then you have to deal with the unfathomable - where did she disappear to. If she went to the nags - again she isn’t seen at the front - yes she could have gone up the metal stairs at the back but why would she. I know there’s uncertainty about her going back home after she went out again after arriving back from work. Could she have gone visiting someone near the parade and then sent someone to get her rucksack whilst ringing mum and dad?
She would have given him her front door key
 
I don't think she went out again after walking home. The NYP microsite suggests that Claudia did not share a lift home with her friend that day
I thought it was reported she went out again to post another letter, I’m working here for memory as I’ve not got my file
 
General or specific concern?
Good question and I can only surmise to the answer. If it was general you might of thought 1 may have that conversation perhaps even 2 but all 3?? When I first looked at the case before I found the 4 - I tried to step through her foot steps, thinking as her to a degree. One of the aspects is her feeling she had upset someone and was steering clear of the nags, I think she perhaps had an intuition she was in trouble and felt uneasy - this may have been conveyed in her conversations - so she may not have had a specific threat in mind but maybe a general feeling of uneasiness
 
Good question and I can only surmise to the answer. If it was general you might of thought 1 may have that conversation perhaps even 2 but all 3?? When I first looked at the case before I found the 4 - I tried to step through her foot steps, thinking as her to a degree. One of the aspects is her feeling she had upset someone and was steering clear of the nags, I think she perhaps had an intuition she was in trouble and felt uneasy - this may have been conveyed in her conversations - so she may not have had a specific threat in mind but maybe a general feeling of uneasiness
But she told her family she was alright with walking to work and needed the exercise
Plus her family would have passed on any specific worries she mentioned ?!
 
But she told her family she was alright with walking to work and needed the exercise
Plus her family would have passed on any specific worries she mentioned ?!
I think they did pass on her concerns. Also if you look to MSM Peter Lawrance voiced his opinion that the answers probably were at the nags
 
Last edited:
I’m with you on this 100% it’s perplexing because how did someone get her out without anyone seeing? If she was taken out the back then it was hardly slick, all the commotion at the front and then numerous people circling the property into the early hours of the morning. Back in my early days of looking at it, before I looked at the arrested 4 I went over the calls/ texts looking at the conversations with her dad/her mum and her friend - there seemed to be an apprehension about walking to work - her dad offered his car, her mum a taxi and her friend said she shouldn’t be walking to work at that time in the morning. Her mum could hear the tv and their fav program on - so this indicated she was at home. I’ve always thought she was at home however then you have to deal with the unfathomable - where did she disappear to. If she went to the nags - again she isn’t seen at the front - yes she could have gone up the metal stairs at the back but why would she. I know there’s uncertainty about her going back home after she went out again after arriving back from work. Could she have gone visiting someone near the parade and then sent someone to get her rucksack whilst ringing mum and dad?

Perhaps she was meeting someone in one of the b&b rooms and didn't want to be seen
 
Search for chronological Claudia clips and you’ll see it
Unless they got the date wrong ?
But certainly morning time ? Walking towards the uni
Was there a glitch in the tape just before this ?
Because that lady ? Should appear as often as the man in blue ? But obviously not together !
It's in the footage from Arron Stoner's timeline-ordered footage on Youtube.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
3,558
Total visitors
3,690

Forum statistics

Threads
622,314
Messages
18,447,993
Members
239,986
Latest member
Bethanya85
Back
Top