UK UK - Claudia Lawrence, 35, Chef, York University, 18 March 2009 #4

[Popejohn3]

If you check NYP website it should show this

Poor MajorLang you need an assistant shame your clue hunting dog can’t type !

 

[MajorLang]

Poor MajorLang you need an assistant shame your clue hunting dog can’t type !

What? Where is the error

 

[Popejohn3]

What? Where is the error

No no just a little joke because everyone keep asking you things

 

[Mrs Marple 2]

She was always a member of one of groups. Is this a new join or has she joined the one with fewer members run by Paul Crooks

Paul is admin, 155 members

 

[MajorLang]

Paul is admin, 155 members

Oh that's interesting @Yozzer FYI. This is the group that is quite open and honest about the "friends" Perhaps S_C is becoming curious?

 

[MajorLang]

No no just a little joke because everyone keep asking you things

Happy to answer any questions I can but also always very interested in New views
There is always some clue we have missed

 

[Kiri]

SC openly answering questions but maintains the 4 are innocent. Interesting. Wonder if she will join here too?!? I'm following over there with interest. Refreshing that SC is commenting. She seems as baffled as us all, as to what happened. On another note I keep getting spam dialogue pop ups on this site (may be my phone) but annoying! So I'm off to fb to see what develops there x

 

[Popejohn3]

SC openly answering questions but maintains the 4 are innocent. Interesting. Wonder if she will join here too?!? I'm following over there with interest. Refreshing that SC is commenting. She seems as baffled as us all, as to what happened. On another note I keep getting spam dialogue pop ups on this site (may be my phone) but annoying! So I'm off to fb to see what develops there x

Do you have to give your real name to join the closed group?
Does an other member have to endorse you ?

 

[x_caz_x]

Do you have to give your real name to join the closed group?
Does an other member have to endorse you ?

I asked to join and was accepted. Used my ordinary facebook account.

 

[MajorLang]

SC openly answering questions but maintains the 4 are innocent. Interesting. Wonder if she will join here too?!? I'm following over there with interest. Refreshing that SC is commenting. She seems as baffled as us all, as to what happened. On another note I keep getting spam dialogue pop ups on this site (may be my phone) but annoying! So I'm off to fb to see what develops there x

If S_C maintains they are innocent and this may well be the case , for them to have been arrested, something or evidence must have pointed in their direction and for the police to be so adamant about wanting to charge them and why were police so frustrated by them? Do they stick together as a solid block and refuse to provide the details of someone-One person perhaps??
Have they stuck together with their message to others outside of law enforcement also-S_C included.

I like what I have heard from S_C during this case, seems very level headed and not afraid of speaking openly. But I'm not convinced that she is in possession of all of the facts?

 

[Popejohn3]

I asked to join and was accepted. Used my ordinary facebook account.

I’ve no intention of joining that website but I am interested in what SC or Jk have to say.
If poss can you copy and paste on here please ?

 

[HongKongPhooey]

I’ve no intention of joining that website but I am interested in what SC or Jk have to say.
If poss can you copy and paste on here please ?

Unfortunately that would be against TOS and might close the thread

 

[Popejohn3]

Unfortunately that would be against TOS and might close the thread

Would you not be able to screen shot and forward in a private message ?

 

[MajorLang]

Would you not be able to screen shot and forward in a private message ?

Best just joining @Popejohn3
Your hardly risking anything particularly if you just observe and don't take part.

 

[Popejohn3]

Best just joining @Popejohn3
Your hardly risking anything particularly if you just observe and don't take part.

Ok but does one have to use their real name ?

 

[Popejohn3]

If S_C maintains they are innocent and this may well be the case , for them to have been arrested, something or evidence must have pointed in their direction and for the police to be so adamant about wanting to charge them and why were police so frustrated by them? Do they stick together as a solid block and refuse to provide the details of someone-One person perhaps??
Have they stuck together with their message to others outside of law enforcement also-S_C included.

I like what I have heard from S_C during this case, seems very level headed and not afraid of speaking openly. But I'm not convinced that she is in possession of all of the facts?

SC is probably frustrated with the police .And the police are probably frustrated with some of the witnesses and some of their colleagues.Some have retired including the top man himself .

 

[MajorLang]

SC is probably frustrated with the police .And the police are probably frustrated with some of the witnesses and some of their colleagues.Some have retired including the top man himself .

Yes aparantly Galloway retired at normal retirement age-nothing sinister.

 

[Draven]

If S_C maintains they are innocent and this may well be the case , for them to have been arrested, something or evidence must have pointed in their direction and for the police to be so adamant about wanting to charge them and why were police so frustrated by them? Do they stick together as a solid block and refuse to provide the details of someone-One person perhaps??
Have they stuck together with their message to others outside of law enforcement also-S_C included.

I like what I have heard from S_C during this case, seems very level headed and not afraid of speaking openly. But I'm not convinced that she is in possession of all of the facts?

Totally agree @MajorLang, they just didn’t have enough evidence to get a conviction. Maybe all they need is a little golden nugget of info & that’ll have them banged to rights.

 

[Nikynoo]

Do you have to give your real name to join the closed group?
Does an other member have to endorse you ?

You can set up a fake FB profile and join that way.

 

[MajorLang]

You can set up a fake FB profile and join that way.

I would be cautious of being indoctrinated by S_C You have to remember that she is probably being fed only what the Perps want her to know. Very similar to Maxine Car in the Ian Huntley case. It's often hard to accept that someone who is a good friend could do harm.
But of course if that friend didn't set out to do harm then they may have even convinced themselves (After 10 Years of believing so) they are not guilty and so very easy to convince someone who believes in you.
Particularly if the culprit is a Narcissist as we know one of them is.
"It's not my fault, she asked for it, I didn't do anything wrong-Look what she did to me?"

There was far too much activity going on around CL house evening and morning for there not to be some evidence left by those arrested. CCTV, car registrations that are traceable, mobile phone conversations, text messages.
When you don't have a body and the Perps all chirp "No Comment" it tells the police one thing but doesn't give them the evidence they need to secure a conviction.

If you have been watching "confession" about Christopher Halliwell" once a suspect goes down the No Comment route it can be very difficult, without the right evidence to get a conviction.

What are we going to learn from S_C? If she isn't going to lead us to the Perps then for me there is absolutely no point in listening to her. Well intentioned that she may be.