What I am trying to imply here ( badly) that I believe the said camera was far too low to pick up the whole person coming out or in from CL door
But the imagery is still good enough to see if "someone" goes out or in her front door and given that there has been much discussion on here in last 48 hours linking her to walking to work or being seen on Melrosegate bridge. The said camera would have picked this up. No the likelihood is that she left by the rear door in the evening. When Oxer said that on that morning he had decided to take another route and not give her a lift, he actually decided not passing her house when doing so was his quickest route.
Why would anyone do that? In the tv interview he did appear to be searching for inspiration when asked why he didn't offer her a lift that day. Was he just a sado with little life who wanted part of the glory of being associated with knowing something.
Was Claudias lift giving line up provided on a more casual basis:
E,g. Friends or colleagues would drive the same walking route as Claudia and if they saw her offer her a lift and so was her default mode to work walking with a lift by someone she knew stopping when they saw her.
Then we have the latest TV document where Claudias two female friends are having what appears to be a staged discussion about not having to apologise over mistakenly using present or past tense when discussing her. That was odd?
JK in the same programme mentions that if she knew who the murderer or murderers were she would drag them to the nearest police station. But would this be the same if an accident had occurred and it wasn't seen as murder?
I believe that what occurred was a drug induced argument between people who knew Claudia that got out of hand and she met her maker in the Nags Head car park. As one of her friends has said on TV. "I hope she was dead before she hit the ground"
I often wonder, if Claudia had been equally responsible for an argument, things got out of hand and an accident occurred. Would the others involved feel that there had been no wrongdoing on their part and has this allowed them to continue their lives with less guilt? IMO This is where the police appear to be looking and so with all the additional evidence and knowledge they will have from interviews, my tendency is not to get embroiled in discussions about stranger sightings, missing backpack sightings, walking to work or any of the other reported activity that is not substantiated by cctv.
As I have said many times before. This case is unlikely to be a "Who Done it" and for me the "why done it" if you consider the above is now becoming clearer.
The last thing the Perps would want is a dead body to be found with possible traces of drugs as that could just put their little Nags Head operation out of business and those higher up the supply chain would be very angry if this happened and so warnings off and fear of revealing what happened may well also apply to the perpetrators, even if it was an accident.
Finally, if you were not involved in Claudias demise but a friend of the Perps. If you had partaken in the same drugs in the past, might you have empathy with what happened and not want a wrong word said about your friends. Equally, if Police had René wales what they believed had happened to Claudia. Would her Dad want this to come to the media?
