The flowers were bought by her, in the early news stories they didn't realise that and assumed the killer brought them, maybe to pose as someone delivering them to get in. I know a witness saw her on the way home with them plus they traced where they came from. They were dried leaves / grasses rather than flowers. I do think it's possible that when posing his scene that he deliberately left them next to her.I really wonder about the flowers. Were they from a known person, or a stranger? Did the others receive gifts - flowers, chocolates, etc. prior to the attacks on them? Is it just pure chance, or is it something her killer did? It just sounds like something out of fiction. The attack seems blitz like, but the posing is something that took time. I think it's easy to draw a line to Sutcliffe, despite the lack of evidence, because he did both. Posing is unusual, much much rarer than tv and film would have us believe. Most posing that happens is fake - say, a partner trying to make a domestic killing look like a stranger-attack. True posing is rare. It's something that gratifies the killer somehow. It's a signature behaviour that the killer needs but is 'unnecessary' otherwise. It takes time that a killer who doesn't need it would use to clean the scene or make their escape. It's a compulsory part of the fantasy made real. But Sutcliffe never stalked his victims beforehand that I know of - no phone calls, no flowers. He just took the first target who presented themselves to him when he was hunting. Working girls, yes, but also teens and middle aged women walking home. Anyone female was a potential target. And their identity didn't matter to him.
I think whoever this person is, they have a body count behind them bigger than we know. The seventies was a paradise for serials. Pre-DNA, post-highway system. High mobility, anonymity. A lot of successful serials were mobile - truck drivers, transients, people who travelled for work. But even those who stayed put could be successful at it in that era. Drive to the next big town or city, kill, be home in time for tea.
MOO
You obviously know a lot about these cases. I'm enjoying learning what you have to offer about them, and I hope that new technologies are going to bring these victims justice, or at least, answers.
Wikipedia stated that her face and I think neck was mutilated, I haven't found a news article stating that yet, may have missed it in my avoidance of the salacious news stories about her, they cite a book as the source. I will be keeping at eye out as the killer also mutilated Lynne Weedon. I think she was also posed in as much as he could do with limited resources.
Sutcliffe was definitely less choosy. Even attacking men. The more you let loose of the pull of Eve Stratford and look at Lynne Weedon and then the similarities between them and Elizabeth Parravicini and Sally Weeton then the more you notice what they have in common. Maybe Eve was the odd one out, partly because he had her in private.
Btw you'd be surprised how cooperative you might be if someone has a big long knife so that's why I take it with a pinch of salt that she knew the killer, I don't disbelieve that, I just don't put all my faith in it. I noticed from all my reading, I think Eve is the only one that there's no evidence that she was followed. It doesn't mean she wasn't, after all she was killed not long after returning home, just that nobody saw anyone and it's not an obvious part of her death.
If in this country we looked more at familial DNA to trace through relatives, a lot more cold cases would be solved I'm sure, so frustrating. The killer of Eve and Lynne may not even still be alive. I seriously don't think this person would stop at two. I don't understand why there aren't more people coming forward who got away. In one of the 1970s scanned press pieces I saw the police had the clever idea to appeal to women to come forward confidentially and share their stories of sexual assault, rape, attempted murder, attacks etc and at least 200 women came forward. Where is that info?! Every killer I can think of had survivors stories. Many sexual predators also started with theft, being peeping tom, taking underwear off washing lines, burglary, going through people's underwear draw etc, progression. It would be a rare person who become fully formed from the get go.
I've long taken an interest but I'm reading a lot right now so more details are fresh in my head, it'll fade.