UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

[Cedars]

He was Trade Ambassador or some such title for his country. That's a decision maker.

jmo

Oddly however, the whole institution of the Monarchy is fancy titles with no authority to make decisions.

JMO

 

[Inthedetails]

Oddly however, the whole institution of the Monarchy is fancy titles with no authority to make decisions.

JMO

I'm pretty sure he made deals - though I also suspect they were for his own benefit. I don't recall details but I once read up on it. It gave him the excuse to travel to other countries for "trade deals." He was removed from the position, iirc.

I don't care enough about the guy to look it up again, tbh....so imo. He's gross.

jmo

 

[303gmf]

I'm pretty sure he made deals - though I also suspect they were for his own benefit. I don't recall details but I once read up on it. It gave him the excuse to travel to other countries for "trade deals." He was removed from the position, iirc.

I don't care enough about the guy to look it up again, tbh....so imo. He's gross.

jmo

Agree! More pigs at the trough

 

[303gmf]

Did anyone check this out?

What do you think?

Pretty extensive if legit.

Waiting for the more tech inclined posters on the Epstein thread to unravel

 

[CatsnChickens]

The word Pizza is often used in paedo circles to describe the type of young person that is being looked for and they are referred to as toppings. Sick and creepy

 

[lisasimpson2010]

Andrew has not committed any crime.

Correction, he has not (yet) been convicted of a crime.

He has neither been found guilty, nor has he been found not guilty (yet) of any of the crimes he has been accused of, or any other crimes he has been associated with/potentially associated with/rumoured to have committed.

Therefore, it is not factually possible for anyone to state whether he has or had not committed any crimes. Only if Andrew is put on trial and exonerated, will it be possible to state that he has not [legally] committed any crimes.

 

[JDG]

Correction, he has not (yet) been convicted of a crime.

He has neither been found guilty, nor has he been found not guilty (yet) of any of the crimes he has been accused of, or any other crimes he has been associated with/potentially associated with/rumoured to have committed.

Therefore, it is not factually possible for anyone to state whether he has or had not committed any crimes. Only if Andrew is put on trial and exonerated, will it be possible to state that he has not [legally] committed any crimes.

Nor has he been charged after two or more investigations.

Let’s start with has he been charged? Nope.

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2019438760962756750

 

[303gmf]

Nor has he charged after two or more investigations.

Let’s start with has he been charged? Nope.

Protected, that’s why no charges, yet
Similar to many other names, money and influence buys silence, for now

 

[COSCitizen]

Protected, that’s why no charges, yet
Similar to many other names, money and influence buys silence, for now

He is essentially in internal exile now since his mother is no longer around to protect him and he has exhausted his brother's patience at long last.

 

[303gmf]

He is essentially in internal exile now since his mother is no longer around to protect him and he has exhausted his brother's patience at long last.

Excellent!

 

[JDG]

Protected, that’s why no charges, yet
Similar to many other names, money and influence buys silence, for now

If there was any solid proof, I believe he would have been charged by now.

If anyone is ‘buying silence’ that is also a crime.

But you need proof.

 

[Inthedetails]

If there was any solid proof, I believe he would have been charged by now.

If anyone is ‘buying silence’ that is also a crime.

But you need proof.

Don't need proof to shun.

jmo

 

[JDG]

Definition of SHUN

to avoid deliberately and especially habitually… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

If you do not have interactions/cross paths with someone, how does shunning them work?

You cannot really avoid someone you’ve never met/known.

 

[Inthedetails]

Definition of SHUN

to avoid deliberately and especially habitually… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

If you do not have interactions/cross paths with someone, how does shunning them work?

You cannot really avoid someone you’ve never met/known.

I'm not assuming any of the perps care if I shun them, lol.

I mean elites shunning disgusting elites. They don't need a conviction to keep them out of their circles and influence.

jmo

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Former Prince Andrew leaves his Windsor home as Britain's royals seek distance from Epstein revelations

He lost his duties, then his titles and then his home: The next steps in the downfall of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are less clear.

www.nbcnews.com

LONDON — Former Prince Andrew has moved out of his sprawling home in Windsor, it has been widely reported by British media, as fresh revelations in the newly-released Epstein files throw up more challenges and embarrassment for Britain’s royals.

Now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has become a persistent headache for King Charles III, who stripped his brother of his princely title in October and ordered him to leave his residence, the Royal Lodge, part of the Crown Estate.

And while Britain’s politicians typically steer away from direct criticism of royals, over the weekend Prime Minister Keir Starmer took the practically unprecedented step of calling on Mountbatten-Windsor to testify before Congress about his dealings with Epstein.

Mountbatten-Windsor, who continues to deny any wrongdoing, has moved to a home on the Sandringham estate, privately owned by Charles, in the east of England. The move generates distance, both literally and symbolically, placing him 140 miles away from the royals' historical seat of power in Windsor, where his neighbors included the heir to the throne, Prince William...