- Joined
- May 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,431
- Reaction score
- 35,710
Am assuming that the hearing continues today?
I think in fairness to her bereavement coach I read the question she posed "how will you feel if in two years time he is with someone else" as a philosophical question. In that it wasn't a pressure but a question for Helen to explore and think about. That if she decided to go ahead with a new relationship with this man that it wasn't a crime for her to do so.
I don't know if Helen was an impulsive person but I suspect not given that she was very careful with money. Ha! I am sooo not like Helen...impulsive as anything as my bank account sometimes shows. I get the impression that Helen thought about things though and I don't think anyone could have pushed her into this relationship if she didn't feel she wanted to. She obviously DID have doubts at times as her blog showed. The move from London being just one example of a big change where she second guessed herself a couple of times but ultimately she went.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I talked again to my bereavement coach. She asked what I liked about The Widower. I reeled off a long list of his qualities. She asked me what I didnt like. There was nothing about him I didnt like. What I didnt like was that he had come into my life now. It was too soon, not part of my plan. She said, OK, dont see him for another eighteen months or two years or whatever time scale you think is appropriate. Then look him up and when you find he is happy with someone else, well deal with your tears of regret then.
Quote Originally Posted by michelle230 View Post
I believe he was asked what he thought his father meant when he said he had "been dealt with" and that`s when he said they didn`t discuss it as no time and other things to talk about...
That doesn't add up to me. He could have followed it up with a further visit or letter or phone call.
I do wonder if the issue with the bereavement counsellor also stems from the fact that she was a "life coach"?
I still think it's extremely telling that their RL relationship began with a "genuine misunderstanding" where IS turned up and caught Helen off guard and unawares in her dressing gown. She had no chance to steel herself, appraise him critically, anything. And with what we know now, I'm sure that was deliberate.]
RSBM
Could anyone tell me the story behind this please? Why did he just turn up? How did he know where she lived?
What does RL stand for?
Thanks in advance
I still think it's extremely telling that their RL relationship began with a "genuine misunderstanding" where IS turned up and caught Helen off guard and unawares in her dressing gown. She had no chance to steel herself, appraise him critically, anything. And with what we know now, I'm sure that was deliberate.]
RSBM
Could anyone tell me the story behind this please? Why did he just turn up? How did he know where she lived?
What does RL stand for?
Thanks in advance
Sorry, RL = real life.
This is all there is in the blog/book, though Helen may have said more elsewhere:
As it turned out and due to a genuine misunderstanding between us, I met The Widower when I was least expecting to, as demonstrated by my outfit. Instead of the carefully thrown together, glossy-haired understated tons-of-make-up no-make-up look, we first came eye-to-eye when I was wearing shrunken tracksuit bottoms, bare feet, a stripy dressing gown, wet hair and no make-up.
From http://planetgrief.com/2012/05/17/painful-pleasure/
In other words, when they had arranged to meet in person for the first time, he turned up at her house well before the agreed time.
They may as well be written in code lol. No idea what the posts are about but definitely looks like it could be him with it being computer related. Do we have any computer experts who can explain what he's asking about?
Could it be related to anything Helen had posted anywhere that he was trying to remove? Or to anything of his that he wanted to delete ?... or is just some irrelevant subject that he was preoccupied with both before and after Helen's death?
Found April 9
http://chipkit.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3651
Found April 13
http://chipkit.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3653
Sleuths, found a 'Sykic' posting here. Not positive same and can't find actual links. May be interesting from the seeming dates given on search for two posts: April 9 2016 6.15pm and April 13 2016 6.23pm
http://chipkit.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=13
Yes, and Helen specifically wanted coaching rather than counselling. I know I'm being harsh blaming the coach though!
I've been watching this ahead of today's evidence to try and get my thoughts out of the pit and back to the person and dog who will hopefully eventually be remembered more for their lives than their deaths:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9GPdcxTs0oE
Thanks for this, it's a lovely reminder of who she really was, instead of the over anxious, terribly worried, unconfident woman described by IS. And, we get to see the real Boris too ☺ poignantly, she's wearing a black and white striped top.
This is what Helen says - it doesn't sound like she felt the coach was very neutral -
His trial previously heard that on the morning of her disappearance, she had been planning the couple’s wedding. But Stewart later told officers that Bailey had been “concerned” that he did not want to marry her, the court was told.
Judge is a dog lover ! Oh dear....![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.