neteditor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,137
- Reaction score
- 3,093
There was no doubt it was Helen and her dog, and no doubt it was April 11. There was no doubt the time was 3.40pm to 3.50pm.
No way.
And from a silhouette?
There was no doubt it was Helen and her dog, and no doubt it was April 11. There was no doubt the time was 3.40pm to 3.50pm.
No way.
Angela John.
The next witness will be Angela John. Mrs John made a statement to police on April 27 relating to Helen Bailey, who she believed to be missing.
I had seen Helen walking the dog on the main road where she lived in Royston on numerous occasions once a month, then I saw a newspaper article saying who she was. I didnt even know where she lived at this time. There was an article in the Royston Crow with a picture of her when her latest book came out, and I thought oh thats the lady who walks the dachshund. Once I found out she was an author I was going to ask her for pointers for my grandchild but I never saw her again.
About a year/18 months ago I saw Helen up by the fire station further up the road from where we live with a tall thin man. She seemed quite animated with him, quite happy. They both had raincoats on. He was very smart.
The day I last saw Helen Bailey was April 11, in the afternoon, between 3.40pm and 3.50pm. I saw her about 20/30 foot away from her house gate. The dog on a lead was with her. Her neighbour had a very tall wooden fence erected, Helen was silhouetted against that. As I was approaching her I thought Oh thats Helen I havent seen her in ages. Then I thought she would get wet as it started drizzling. There was no doubt it was Helen and her dog, and no doubt it was April 11. There was no doubt the time was 3.40pm to 3.50pm.
PC Woodhouse “At 8pm on April 20 I briefed another team of officers. At 9.30pm we searched a wooded area opposite the house. This area is known as Royston/Thurfield Heath - an area popular with dog walkers.
I think these witnesses are talking mince. That's all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Witness had not seen Helen wearing that type of clothing before
Mrs John said Helen was wearing a stone or beige pair of trousers and a shirt of the same colour when she saw the author on April 11. Trimmer: Youd never seen Helen on a similar occasion wearing clothes like that?
Mrs John: No
Using car in rain helped determine date
Trimmer: “Why can’t it be the week before that you saw Helen, when you went to the Building Society [on Monday April 4]?”
Mrs John: “Because I normally walk to Royston, but this time I used the car because it was raining.”
The student's mother said it was a dry day![]()
Using car in rain helped determine date
Trimmer: “Why can’t it be the week before that you saw Helen, when you went to the Building Society [on Monday April 4]?”
Mrs John: “Because I normally walk to Royston, but this time I used the car because it was raining.”
'No doubts' on date she saw Helen
Mrs John is now being re-examined by the defence.
Defence barrister Simon Russell Flint: When you saw Helen Bailey what had you been doing before?
Mrs John: Id been to the hairdressers, I went and got that confirmed with the hairdressers. When I went to the Building Society last I walked there. It was April 11 - from 3.40pm to 3.50pm - when I last saw Helen Bailey.
There are no doubts in my mind.
The student's mother said it was a dry day![]()
Presumably means this fence, to the right of Helen's house as you look at the map
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.0...V0vBhaXT2ROuyczG0Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.