Chambo1994
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2019
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 967
I would be happy to hear it if were relevant - but she'd been discharged over two years before! she doesn't appear to have been on the uni's radar. She showed no signs of being suicidal on Beverley road when several buses and cars were driving past! How easy to step into the road
If it was considered relevant to delve into mental health then perhaps it should be done by an expert rather than a defence lawyer! Who could put it n context
I would imagine there was equally relevant stuff from those dealing with PR which we didn't hear. Posters on here have mentioned people hat had dealt with him who offered insights but nothing about him.
I think me and you have extremely differing views and outlooks on mental health problems and how they effect people so I’ll not argue the points made too much...

What I will say is, being discharged does not mean all your problems have gone... it means they deem themselves happy enough following a specific meeting that the patient is not an immediate risk.
There was various mentions by the defence of recent struggles with mental health which we didn’t hear during the trial, these included her boyfriend thinking she’d relapsed in the new year, falling out with flat mates, feeling like she wasn’t achieving her goals and so on. While these might seem minor to some posters as “things that happen at Uni”, that would not be the case for everyone. We all act differently to situations and if you do suffer from depression or feelings of low self worth, minor things to others can be seriously damaging to you.
as I’ve previously stated, I do not believe she did commit suicide, however there was enough evidence through personal records and witness statements to suggest it COULD have been a possibility, therefore the defence job is to explore it.
Contrary to a couple of posters opinion, the defence do have to explore other scenarios and outcomes, not just sit argue what the prosecution say happened...