VERDICT WATCH UK - Libby Squire, 21, last seen outside Welly club, found deceased, Hull, 31 Jan 2019 #24

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #101
I would be happy to hear it if were relevant - but she'd been discharged over two years before! she doesn't appear to have been on the uni's radar. She showed no signs of being suicidal on Beverley road when several buses and cars were driving past! How easy to step into the road

If it was considered relevant to delve into mental health then perhaps it should be done by an expert rather than a defence lawyer! Who could put it n context

I would imagine there was equally relevant stuff from those dealing with PR which we didn't hear. Posters on here have mentioned people hat had dealt with him who offered insights but nothing about him.

I think me and you have extremely differing views and outlooks on mental health problems and how they effect people so I’ll not argue the points made too much... :D

What I will say is, being discharged does not mean all your problems have gone... it means they deem themselves happy enough following a specific meeting that the patient is not an immediate risk.

There was various mentions by the defence of recent struggles with mental health which we didn’t hear during the trial, these included her boyfriend thinking she’d relapsed in the new year, falling out with flat mates, feeling like she wasn’t achieving her goals and so on. While these might seem minor to some posters as “things that happen at Uni”, that would not be the case for everyone. We all act differently to situations and if you do suffer from depression or feelings of low self worth, minor things to others can be seriously damaging to you.

as I’ve previously stated, I do not believe she did commit suicide, however there was enough evidence through personal records and witness statements to suggest it COULD have been a possibility, therefore the defence job is to explore it.

Contrary to a couple of posters opinion, the defence do have to explore other scenarios and outcomes, not just sit argue what the prosecution say happened...
 
  • #102
I must admit this has really shaken my faith in the legal system. Libby's while private life was up for speculation when she hadn't done anything wrong and had been discharged from the mental health services. Yet any psych assessments of PR weren't allowed.

And I'm really wondering if this system of trial by jury is the best if the law is so complex. I can't think of anything else fair but there's got to be a less combatative way of finding the truth rather than twisting it to suit.

This is an area where many want reform - I know this was a big topic following the Grace Millane murder. Now Grace got lots of coverage and outrage (rightly) but unfortunately many vulnerable kiwis get assaulted every day by violent men and they don't get the attention.

I am not sure what the solution is, but I do believe overall there is a huge problem with abusive men preying on vulnerable women and children - especially in domestic situations (NZ has a huge DV problem).

Then when things finally end up with someone dead, raped etc - we get into these huge discussions about guilt, victim blaming etc

But at the end of the day the facts are that he preyed upon a vulnerable young woman, raped her in a premeditated way, and placed her in danger.

I feel like the current proceedings have an unreality to them because he can just lie about what happened, and the criminal justice system kind of lacks the tools to impose a broader responsibility on him.

One reform I would like to see is more jeopardy for pre-trial statements. Given his lies about his interactions with Libby, why should he then receive the benefit of the doubt about those lies as proposed by defense counsel?

IMO it should attract a strong negative direction from the judge to the jury.

It's not like he didn't have counsel when he made those statements to police. he was warned. so if you choose to obstruct justice pre-trial, then there should be more consequence at trial.
 
  • #103
Duplicated post below
 
Last edited:
  • #104
I don't think so either. I also think if you can't find murder you can't find manslaughter either. I think people are seeing if as a cop out rather than a crime in its own right.

Definitely. I’d have to be persuaded by evidence that was in line with a judge’s direction for manslaughter. But I’m not sure I have been from the snippets we’ve heard. Guilty for rape though.

I just feel I’m more likely to believe he could accidentally kill her whilst raping her but not be sure if he has. And to go back later to check and that’s when he could have moved LS. I wonder if she could have choked on her vomit - not sure if there would be signs after being in the water so long.

I can’t ever imagine daring to go back knowing someone has died if I’d _already_ moved their body. Which leaves me thinking he went back to fix things by checking to see if she was really dead and moving her or that he hadn’t hurt her and she’d gone. BUT I’m not a murderer so obviously don’t have insights into the mind of one!

Also if he intended to seriously harm her and he did, why not just put in that extra time, even a minute extra, to dispose of her body immediately I wonder. I struggle to understand why he’d think “I’ll do that later”. Unless he was disturbed by something. So I can’t believe he didn’t do all those things in the one visit if he intended to murder her. But also struggle with how he did it all in 7.5 minutes.

I completely discount the screams because of the contradictory timing, how long they go on for in the little time they were there together, and the fact there is a reasonable explanation for screams (foxes). I think they fog the evidence too much.

I’ve been particularly interested in this case as I was assaulted in Hull at the age of 21 many years ago. I was so drunk, that when I did the e fit for the police, it was the man, who found me wandering three miles away from the scene with my top torn and hanging off, that I described! But he did also try to kiss me. He called the police though. I was found closer to home but in the completely wrong direction. Edit to add that for those who are local, at the time I lived Priory Road near the cottingham end and I was found near Anlaby. So I’d headed in that direction from the city centre but didn’t turn to home. Sorry for the non locals, I’ve no idea how to do maps.

I vaguely remember crying a lot but no screaming and remembering “I just need to put one foot in front of another and I’ll move and be safe”. I had no eye on the path I was taking beyond each step. I remember watching my feet moving but no focus on the surrounding area.

I also apparently passed a couple who rang it in, but I didn’t ask them to help me. They offered to (I was told by the police) but I carried on alone. If I’d been seen on cameras I imagine I’d have been all over the path, as an hour earlier I was falling over. (I always used to fall over a lot when drunk - or down stairs in bars). So I can really believe also that LS just “moved” and fell into the river.

We also have a history in Hull of people going missing after nights out and being found or presumed to be in the river. Or falling into our local marina is another thing that seems to happen more often than you’d expect.

I’ve also been so hypothermic on a night out I’ve done the removing clothes and burrowing thing. To the point strangers have thrown coats on me. That was a New Year’s Eve when my taxi didn’t arrive. I remember wanting to find somewhere nice to sleep. But crying that the whole world hated me. I don’t miss my 20s!

The day LS was being searched for, there was a murder mystery event in the city centre that I attended with my family. We could see the helicopters but weren’t sure why they were out. Really sad to think poor Libby was in the river nearby.

edited above to add approx where I lived for more context
 
Last edited:
  • #105
Contrary to a couple of posters opinion, the defence do have to explore other scenarios and outcomes, not just sit argue what the prosecution say happened...

RSBM

I agree they have to explore them. What concerns me is where the exploration is simply wild speculation from counsel which isn't really supported by the evidence.

So the fact that Libby was suicidal in the past, in no way supports an inference she was suicidal on the night in question. In fact we have evidence from people who knew her, that she wasn't suicidal. Similarly getting raped in no way supports an inference of committing suicide moments later.

I feel it is a often a bit too easy for counsel to speculate scenarios into existence which may be logical fallacies - yet present them as "common sense"

e.g. drunk people drown in rivers periodically (e.g jumping off bridges) - does that have any relevance to the current situation?

Defence counsel are masters of innuendo
 
  • #106
RSBM

I agree they have to explore them. What concerns me is where the exploration is simply wild speculation from counsel which isn't really supported by the evidence.

So the fact that Libby was suicidal in the past, in no way supports an inference she was suicidal on the night in question. In fact we have evidence from people who knew her, that she wasn't suicidal. Similarly getting raped in no way supports an inference of committing suicide moments later.

I feel it is a often a bit too easy for counsel to speculate scenarios into existence which may be logical fallacies - yet present them as "common sense"

e.g. drunk people drown in rivers periodically (e.g jumping off bridges) - does that have any relevance to the current situation?

Defence counsel are masters of innuendo

I think people are looking in to what was reported at the start of the trial and not at what was in the defence closing.

we were given snippets by HDM about the mental health issues as rightly they didn’t want it to become victim shaming IMO

But the key points were that as early as the new year her boyfriend believed she had been self harming after seeing cuts on her skin. IMO I feel like there will have been more info surrounding the falling out with friends and how it affected her, these weren’t just throw away comments made by the defence.

I agree to an extent that these will have been twisted by the defence to suit their case, but the prosecution will also have twisted certain points to match their case! It’s a two way street.

I will reiterate that I DO NOT think suicide was the outcome, I’m simply pointing out that the defence have done what their job is and this scenario will be a consideration for the jurors
 
  • #107
I don't think so either. I also think if you can't find murder you can't find manslaughter either. I think people are seeing if as a cop out rather than a crime in its own right.

Why would people see it as a cop out ? And especially the jury.
They have been given clear instruction from the Judge the three options and what needs to be proven on each count ? Why would people not look at each option individually.
It would make sense to start with murder and decide if you "are sure" ...if so no need to even look at the manslaughter.
If your "not sure" it makes sense to test the evidence again to see if you "are sure" ..and so on.
Personally I think there is still a good chance he may get murder ..if the jury were sure in the first place there is no reason to even consider manslaughter...the only people who should be considering manslaughter are those who are "not sure" on murder. Who should have voted not guilty
 
  • #108
This is my top line belief as well.

But @Tortoise 's reverse timeline gives me some pause. But as we don't have access to the detailed evidence, I can't really reach any proper conclusions.
One thing that does confuse me about the not guilty camp is what was PR doing outside the park for all that time. And I'd appreciate your opinion on it.

Locals have said they have no issue with the rape and murder timings.

PR says the rape takes place by the green shed outside the park. He doesn't admit to going into the park. So if we're very, very generous to PR and allow a minute for the rape - what was happening in the rest of that time

PR says he leaves Libby outside the park and he remains outside the park. He is careful to keep himself outside of the park so for misadventure that has to be Libby's start point.

So isn't it important to find a reasonable explanation for what was happening if you believe that? Cos it's a significant amount of time? And PR doesn't allow for an assumption that he left her in the park
 
  • #109
I think me and you have extremely differing views and outlooks on mental health problems and how they effect people so I’ll not argue the points made too much... :D

What I will say is, being discharged does not mean all your problems have gone... it means they deem themselves happy enough following a specific meeting that the patient is not an immediate risk.

There was various mentions by the defence of recent struggles with mental health which we didn’t hear during the trial, these included her boyfriend thinking she’d relapsed in the new year, falling out with flat mates, feeling like she wasn’t achieving her goals and so on. While these might seem minor to some posters as “things that happen at Uni”, that would not be the case for everyone. We all act differently to situations and if you do suffer from depression or feelings of low self worth, minor things to others can be seriously damaging to you.

as I’ve previously stated, I do not believe she did commit suicide, however there was enough evidence through personal records and witness statements to suggest it COULD have been a possibility, therefore the defence job is to explore it.

Contrary to a couple of posters opinion, the defence do have to explore other scenarios and outcomes, not just sit argue what the prosecution say happened...

I agree ,everyone ...no matter how repulsive..is entitled to a fair trial...there was no choice really but to bring up her mental health when she had stated a method of suicide so relevant to the case .. albeit years ago ...especially as her boyfriend felt she had been self harming just weeks earlier.
Although I didn't like the way the defence worded some of evidence...it was relevant.
I do not think they dragged her name through the mud it was just relevant
 
Last edited:
  • #110
One thing that does confuse me about the not guilty camp is what was PR doing outside the park for all that time.

Locals have said they have no issue with the rape and murder timings.

PR says the rape takes place by the green shed outside the park. He doesn't admit to going into the park. So if we're very, very generous to PR and allow a minute for the rape - what was happening in the rest of that time

PR says he leaves Libby outside the park and he remains outside the park. He is careful to keep himself outside of the park so for misadventure that has to be Libby's start point.

So isn't it important to find a reasonable explanation for what was happening if you believe that? Cos it's a significant amount of time? And PR doesn't allow for an assumption that he left her in the park

PR doesn't have to give a reasonable explanation...it shouldn't be a case of whose version do we believe.
He could have said nothing ...the question the jury must ask themselves is ...from the evidence the prosecution have presented are they sure he murdered her
 
Last edited:
  • #111
I agree everyone ...no matter how repulsive..is entitled to a fair trial...there was no choice really but to bring up her mental health when she had stated a method of suicide so relevant to the case .. albeit years ago ...especially as her boyfriend felt she had been self harming just weeks earlier.
Although I didn't like the way the defence worded some of evidence...it was relevant.
I do not think they dragged her name through the mud it was just relevant
What's so annoying is that her poor family have been gut wrenchingly honest and yet that little rat has lied and lied and lied :mad:
 
  • #112
I think me and you have extremely differing views and outlooks on mental health problems and how they effect people so I’ll not argue the points made too much... :D

What I will say is, being discharged does not mean all your problems have gone... it means they deem themselves happy enough following a specific meeting that the patient is not an immediate risk.

There was various mentions by the defence of recent struggles with mental health which we didn’t hear during the trial, these included her boyfriend thinking she’d relapsed in the new year, falling out with flat mates, feeling like she wasn’t achieving her goals and so on. While these might seem minor to some posters as “things that happen at Uni”, that would not be the case for everyone. We all act differently to situations and if you do suffer from depression or feelings of low self worth, minor things to others can be seriously damaging to you.

as I’ve previously stated, I do not believe she did commit suicide, however there was enough evidence through personal records and witness statements to suggest it COULD have been a possibility, therefore the defence job is to explore it.

Contrary to a couple of posters opinion, the defence do have to explore other scenarios and outcomes, not just sit argue what the prosecution say happened...

I agree with you @Chambo1994 as uncomfortable as it is for all of us, it did have to be explored.

Further, I would add that being ‘discharged’ at age 18 by CAMHS at age 18 is often down to the transition to adult services. Your care under CAMHS, in most cases, comes to an end once you have reached 18. CAMHS can do a referral for continued care, but this depends on may different factors, including what services are available locally. Adult services works in a completely different way for the vast majority, and there is a far heavier reliance upon the patient’s will to engage and make demands of the services that are available, unless hospitalised.

This is my own opinion based upon a close friends current, and very frustrating, experience.
 
  • #113
Last edited:
  • #114
Also thanks to the person who posted a link re the river from the blog Wild at Hull-what a great blog!
There’s a recent post where they took in oak road pond and a good walk along a stretch of river Hull
Wild at Hull: Urban birding at Hull: Oak Road Lake, River Hull, Stoneferry road circular walk
http://wildathull.blogspot.com/2021/01/urban-birding-at-hull-oak-road-lake.html
It really is amazing how high and low and how quickly the river changes. You can see a stretch in the post above as the tide is lowering.
No worries. It gives some great views of the banks of the river up close although I had not seen the page you link to here and it is very interesting, showing pictures of "a frosty view", so similar conditions to the night we are concerned with. The blog poster mentions, "I was really enjoying the crunchy, frosty mud underfoot... I don't recommend this walk in the Winter as it is slippery and muddy, but the frozen mud made it an interesting option...I reached the Stoneferry Bridges having had just one tumble on an icy slope." This gives us a good idea of the conditions Libby would have encountered.
 
  • #115
One thing that does confuse me about the not guilty camp is what was PR doing outside the park for all that time. And I'd appreciate your opinion on it.

Locals have said they have no issue with the rape and murder timings.

PR says the rape takes place by the green shed outside the park. He doesn't admit to going into the park. So if we're very, very generous to PR and allow a minute for the rape - what was happening in the rest of that time

PR says he leaves Libby outside the park and he remains outside the park. He is careful to keep himself outside of the park so for misadventure that has to be Libby's start point.

So isn't it important to find a reasonable explanation for what was happening if you believe that? Cos it's a significant amount of time? And PR doesn't allow for an assumption that he left her in the park

With the exception of Vermont, I feel that many of the locals on this site who all actually know the park have stated that they do actually have issue with the timing.

Are you suggesting that PR pulled up his car, immediately got Libby out of the car and raped her instantaneously? That there couldn't possibly have been any talking, any cajoling, any scuffling any resistance that nededy to be overcome, any after the event activity? That only that one minute of rape occurred and he then just stood there?
 
  • #116
I think me and you have extremely differing views and outlooks on mental health problems and how they effect people so I’ll not argue the points made too much... :D

What I will say is, being discharged does not mean all your problems have gone... it means they deem themselves happy enough following a specific meeting that the patient is not an immediate risk.

There was various mentions by the defence of recent struggles with mental health which we didn’t hear during the trial, these included her boyfriend thinking she’d relapsed in the new year, falling out with flat mates, feeling like she wasn’t achieving her goals and so on. While these might seem minor to some posters as “things that happen at Uni”, that would not be the case for everyone. We all act differently to situations and if you do suffer from depression or feelings of low self worth, minor things to others can be seriously damaging to you.

as I’ve previously stated, I do not believe she did commit suicide, however there was enough evidence through personal records and witness statements to suggest it COULD have been a possibility, therefore the defence job is to explore it.

Contrary to a couple of posters opinion, the defence do have to explore other scenarios and outcomes, not just sit argue what the prosecution say happened...
I agree they have to explore different scenarios.

So what is the best way to present that:
Either A defence lawyer tasked with defending the indefensible for a client with a load of evidence against him. A job we accept is essential but should not be allowed to stay into victim blaming.

Or a member of the mental health team that could put Libby's problems in their context. Were they serious attempts or cries for help? Were they linked to issues in a specific situation eg bullying or something? Why was she discharged? Why hadn't she appeared on the university's radar?

And how many rape victims, or others in a state of shock and survival (such as hypothermia) commit suicide?
 
  • #117
I agree with you @Chambo1994 as uncomfortable as it is for all of us, it did have to be explored.

Further, I would add that being ‘discharged’ at age 18 by CAMHS at age 18 is often down to the transition to adult services. Your care under CAMHS, in most cases, comes to an end once you have reached 18. CAMHS can do a referral for continued care, but this depends on may different factors, including what services are available locally. Adult services works in a completely different way for the vast majority, and there is a far heavier reliance upon the patient’s will to engage and make demands of the services that are available, unless hospitalised.

This is my own opinion based upon a close friends current, and very frustrating, experience.
Dont forget though that Libby was at Uni and the Unis do have excellent support in place for mental health issues. So students dont need to seek help locally as such, it's far more accessible.
 
  • #118
This is an area where many want reform - I know this was a big topic following the Grace Millane murder. Now Grace got lots of coverage and outrage (rightly) but unfortunately many vulnerable kiwis get assaulted every day by violent men and they don't get the attention.

I am not sure what the solution is, but I do believe overall there is a huge problem with abusive men preying on vulnerable women and children - especially in domestic situations (NZ has a huge DV problem).

Then when things finally end up with someone dead, raped etc - we get into these huge discussions about guilt, victim blaming etc

But at the end of the day the facts are that he preyed upon a vulnerable young woman, raped her in a premeditated way, and placed her in danger.

I feel like the current proceedings have an unreality to them because he can just lie about what happened, and the criminal justice system kind of lacks the tools to impose a broader responsibility on him.

One reform I would like to see is more jeopardy for pre-trial statements. Given his lies about his interactions with Libby, why should he then receive the benefit of the doubt about those lies as proposed by defense counsel?

IMO it should attract a strong negative direction from the judge to the jury.

It's not like he didn't have counsel when he made those statements to police. he was warned. so if you choose to obstruct justice pre-trial, then there should be more consequence at trial.
I agree wholeheartedly.

The prosecution, quite rightly, has to stick at all times to the truth or the defence and appeals system will eviscerate them.

The defence can hide behind the lies of the defendant with no sanctions whatsoever

It isn't right. And it should be dealt with by the judge more seriously
 
  • #119
With the exception of Vermont, I feel that many of the locals on this site who all actually know the park have stated that they do actually have issue with the timing.

Are you suggesting that PR pulled up his car, immediately got Libby out of the car and raped her instantaneously? That there couldn't possibly have been any talking, any cajoling, any scuffling any resistance that nededy to be overcome, any after the event activity? That only that one minute of rape occurred and he then just stood there?
IMO yes the rape would have been extremely quick. The rest of the time, he was murdering her and taking her to the river, not standing there doing nothing.
 
  • #120
I agree they have to explore different scenarios.

So what is the best way to present that:
Either A defence lawyer tasked with defending the indefensible for a client with a load of evidence against him. A job we accept is essential but should not be allowed to stay into victim blaming.

Or a member of the mental health team that could put Libby's problems in their context. Were they serious attempts or cries for help? Were they linked to issues in a specific situation eg bullying or something? Why was she discharged? Why hadn't she appeared on the university's radar?

And how many rape victims, or others in a state of shock and survival (such as hypothermia) commit suicide?

The defence lawyer is only reading from statements made by others ? Just stating facts
If the prosecution thought that bringing in an expert witness around this would help they would have done
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
91
Guests online
2,654
Total visitors
2,745

Forum statistics

Threads
633,182
Messages
18,637,246
Members
243,434
Latest member
neuerthewall20
Back
Top